On Wed, 2011-07-13 at 20:28 -0700, Darren Hart wrote:
On 07/13/2011 03:48 PM, Joshua Lock wrote:
On Wed, 2011-07-13 at 06:57 -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
just perusing the documentation in my typically pedantic fashion and a couple questions about style. first, is the proper spelling "Bitbake" or "BitBake" since the doc source seems to bounce back and forth and it really should be consistent.
I believe it's the latter, at least that's what I've always use.
Agreed:
The man page: BitBake - simple tool for the execution of tasks
The user manual: BitBake User Manual
Those seem like the two lines of documentation that are most likely to be correct :-) So unless Richard or Chris pipe up, I'd go with BitBake.
I think we've been leaning towards BitBake for a while.