Re: [PATCH 1/1] local.conf.sample: add CONNECTIVITY_CHECK_URIS


Joshua Lock <josh@...>
 

On Wed, 2011-07-13 at 10:28 -0700, Darren Hart wrote:

On 07/12/2011 07:32 PM, Joshua Lock wrote:
Add CONNECTIVITY_CHECK_URIS to run the network connectivity sanity test for
http, https and git sources.

Signed-off-by: Joshua Lock <josh@...>
---
meta-yocto/conf/local.conf.sample | 8 ++++++++
1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/meta-yocto/conf/local.conf.sample b/meta-yocto/conf/local.conf.sample
index ea32b81..fb20f2c 100644
--- a/meta-yocto/conf/local.conf.sample
+++ b/meta-yocto/conf/local.conf.sample
@@ -214,3 +214,11 @@ NO32LIBS = "1"
# The network based PR service host and port
#PRSERV_HOST = "localhost"
#PRSERV_PORT = "8585"
+
+# Use the following URI's to test whether we can succesfully fetch from the
+# network (and warn you if not). This test will be run each time a new build
+# directory is specfied, if you wish to disable it delete or comment out the
+# following few lines that define CONNECTIVITY_CHECK_URIS.
+CONNECTIVITY_CHECK_URIS = "git://git.yoctoproject.org/yocto-firewall-test;protocol=git;rev=HEAD \
+ https://eula-downloads.yoctoproject.org/index.php \
+ http://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/report.cgi"

Would this not be better in a distro config file? conf/distro/poky.conf
comes to mind.

Josh pointed out that the lsb variant would then miss out - so perhaps a
network-sanity.inc file could be included by each distro defined in a
layer. It doesn't make sense in layer.conf as multiple layers can be
used - but as I understand it, only a single distro is built at a time?
I was being stupid both when I submitted this patch and when we
discussed it, the poky.conf file is inherited by each of the
distributions in meta-yocto so it makes sense to define this variable
there.


I like the idea of it working by default without any requirements on
local.conf. The user could override this variable in local.conf if they
want, but I don't think it should be required to be there for the checks
to work.
You are entirely correct. I should also set it with ?= so it's easy to
override.

v2 patch imminent.

Thanks,
Joshua
--
Joshua Lock
Yocto Project "Johannes factotum"
Intel Open Source Technology Centre

Join yocto@lists.yoctoproject.org to automatically receive all group messages.