Re: Layer input


Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfield@...>
 

On 13-07-08 11:16 AM, Paul Eggleton wrote:
On Friday 28 June 2013 14:36:48 Khem Raj wrote:
On Jun 28, 2013, at 4:22 AM, "Rifenbark, Scott M"
<scott.m.rifenbark@intel.com> wrote:
I count eight meta-* layers in the YP repositories that don't exist in the
OE area. I understand what you are saying though and I can word it that
way to dampen the existence of the "many" differences :)
hmm may be they should be added to layer index. at least the ones which are
still maintained.
This is down to me, I've been keeping the layer index up-to-date for the
layers on yoctoproject.org. Listing the ones that aren't there, with comments
as to why not:

experimental/meta-darwin
- ancient, unmaintained, no conf/layer.conf
experimental/meta-m2
- ancient, unmaintained
experimental/meta-maemo
- ancient, unmaintained, no conf/layer.conf
experimental/meta-trusted
- not actively maintained
experimental/meta-x32
- ancient, we should probably just delete this
meta-dlna
- replaced by collaboration with meta-guacamayo
meta-extras
- not usable as a layer, most recipes unbuildable; I'm slowly whittling it
down as bits of it reappear in OE layers until one day hopefully it'll
become empty
meta-intel-contrib
- contrib repo for meta-intel
meta-jarvis
- joke layer
meta-meson
- (probably could add)
meta-meson-bsp
- (probably could add)
meta-minnow
- (was waiting for hardware availability)
meta-yocto-kernel-extras
- now submitted to the layer index
meta-zynq
- status not entirely clear, but seems to have been superseded?
Superseded. The xilinx guys have linux-yocto support in hand in their
layers no, so we can mark this as dead.

Bruce


Cheers,
Paul

Join yocto@lists.yoctoproject.org to automatically receive all group messages.