Re: What is GMAE?
Jack Mitchell <ml@...>
On 12/14/12 21:57, Brian Hutchinson wrote:
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 4:09 PM, Zhang, Jessica <jessica.zhang@...> wrote:Hi Brian,Actually I talked with Richard regarding retiring the toolchain targets (meta-toolchain and meta-toolchain-gmae) as Mark mentioned that now we can build a toolchain matching the >image. Also, we're continue improving adt-installer which also allows you to setup sysroot using the target image as well. Richard's concern is there maybe some legacy user that >preferred the toolchain target. With the latest changes in toolchain generation which really maps to target images, probably we should unplug to legacy ones to make the toolchain generation more streamline. Thoughts or concerns?I'm one of the users that is stuck using Edison 6.0. I'm desperate
I may be missing a trick here, but for our internal toolchain I pretty much made a copy of meta-toolchain, made a copy of the toolchain-packagegroup, edited the package group to contain the same libs, apps etc as my image, pointed meta-toolchain copy to that package-group instead of the default and now when ever I make an update to the image it is just a case of running
bitbake core-image-product meta-toolchain-product
and that spits out both the image and customized toolchain. If I have missed something obvious then please excuse my ramblings :)