Hi All,

 We have filled the newest list on the next Table-1 and made a  preliminary draft or plan according the meeting with Intel Thursday . If you have good suggestions, I will add your ideas to plan for Yocto 1.0 LSB Test.

                                                               
                                                                                                                                                                                                                     Table-1    The status for lsb test

LSB Test Suite	Version	Result	Left work	May/Days	Start Date	Finish Date	Status	Completed Percentage	Defects filed	Developer	Risk/Issue
Cpp-T2C Tests	4.0.2-1	Passed	submit	2	2010-12-20	2010-12-21	In Progress	90%		Jingdong Lu
Libstdc++ Tests	4.1.0-7	Passed	submit	3	2010-12-22	2010-12-24	In Progress	90%		Jingdong Lu
Perl Tests	4.0.7-1	Passed	None	2	2010-12-27	2010-12-28	Done	100%		Jingdong Lu
Python Runtime Tests	4.0.2-1	Passed	submit	3	2010-12-29	2010-12-31	In Progress	90%	Bug 614(Open)	Jingdong Lu
Python Tests	2.4.5-2	Passed	submit	0			In Progress	90%		Jingdong Lu
OLVER Core Tests		Passed	submit	6	2011-1-4	2011-1-11	In Progress	90%		Jingdong Lu
Command Check	4.0.0-2	Passed	LSB	3	2011-1-12	2011-1-14	In Progress	90%	BUG 520(Closed)	Jingdong Lu
Tcl Tests	8.5.7-6	Passed	None	5	2011-1-17	2011-1-21	Done	100%		Jingdong Lu
Library Check	4.0.2-1	Failures: 2	qt3	5	2011-1-12	2011-1-18	In Progress	80%		Jingdong Lu	Query if we need to handle any QT3 issues
Desktop Tests		Passed	submit	4	2010-12-20	2010-12-29	In Progress	90%	BUG 567(Closed) BUG 569(Closed) BUG 570(Closed)	Xiaofeng Yan
Desktop-T2C Tests	4.0.2-1	Failures: 1	LSB	4	2010-12-20	2010-12-29	Block	90%	BUG 571(Accepted)	Xiaofeng Yan	Test suite led to these failed items. http://bugs.linuxbase.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3153
Qt4-Azov Tests	4.0.2-1	Failures:3	LSB	4	2010-12-30	2011-1-5	Block	90%		Xiaofeng Yan	Test suite led to these failed items. (Qlocale) http://bugs.linuxbase.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3125 (QmenBar) http://bugs.linuxbase.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3124 Http://bugs.linuxbase.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3067
Xts5 Tests	5.1.5-19	Passed	submit	5	2011-1-6	2010-1-12	In Progress	90%		Xiaofeng Yan
Core Tests	4.0.5-1	Failures: 16	LSB	5	2011-1-19	2011-1-25	Block	90%		Xiaofeng Yan Jingdong Lu	Test suite led to these failed items: T.c_iflag http://bugs.linuxbase.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3033 T.tcgetattr http://bugs.linuxbase.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3033 http://bugs.linuxbase.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2071 Some bugs related to hardware: /tset/LSB.os/ioprim/readv_L/T.readv_L 24 /tset/LSB.os/ioprim/writev_L/T.writev_L 30 /tset/LSB.os/libm/fpeDivZero/T.fpeDivZero 2
Qt3-Azov Tests	4.0.2-1	Passed	None	4	2011-2-14	2011-2-17	Done	100%		Xiaofeng Yan
LSB Test Suite			creat-lsb-image LSB_Setup.sh	0			Done	100%		Xiaofeng Yan
X86_32 LSB Finish Date	2011-2-17
Re-test on X86_64 & ppc Finish Date	2011-3-11
Yocto M3 Stabilize Finish Date	2011-2-11
Tested on: (self built LSB image)

The work for lsb test has finished by now . We are pruning file task-poky-lsb.bb which contains many unnecessary packages.

Now there aren't still a clear ideas about what should do in Yocto 1.0 for lsb test. We think we should get the next object in Yocto 1.0 for LSB test.

                                                                       Table-2: LSB Test Plan

Target Platfrom	Tester	Start Time
Qemu (x86_64,arm,ppc)	Wind River
Hardware(ppc,arm)	Wind River
Hardware(x86,x86_64)	Intel

Tester can report bugs from lsb test to bugzilla and we will solve it as soon as possible. If all test results are same as qeme x86, then we think that we achieve Yocto 1.0's aim. If you have better proposal, Please inform us and we can modified our goal according to your proposal. Perhaps your plan is better and suit Yocto 1.0 LSB test better.