Hello,

Here are the statistics for last week. Alejandro was on SWAT duty.

10 failures were triaged:

* 6 by Alejandro
- 1 occurrence of new bug 14341
- 2 new occurrences of bug 14251
- 1 new occurrence of bug 14201
- 1 new occurrence of bug 14230
- 1 new occurrence of bug 14295

* 4 by Richard
- 4 for an experimental build

There was an issue with the autobuilder/swatbot reporter code that
prevented more failures to be logged, hence the low number.

Regards,

--
Alexandre Belloni, co-owner and COO, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com

Hi All,

We've had some issues with the connection between swatbot and the autobuilder 
meaning that swatbot wasn't getting build entries or updates for some periods
over the last few weeks.

With some help from Michael we figured out the issue and I've updated the 
autobuilder notifier code so it that it reconnects properly if logins expire.

Unfortunately we don't yet have a way to replay lost builds data back to swatbot
to bring it's database back in sync.

Over the weekend I did test:

gcc 11 - issues were reported to Khem on the mailing list
gcc 10.3 - there were several failures from this and we're now testing revised patches

Cheers,

Richard

Hello,

Here are the statistics for last week. Paul was on SWAT duty.

21 failures were triaged:

* 18 by Paul
- 1 occurrence of new bug 14331
- 4 new occurrences of bug 14329
- 3 new occurrences of bug 14029
- 2 new occurrences of bug 13802
- 2 new occurrences of bug 14294
- 1 new occurrence of bug 14163
- 1 new occurrence of bug 14200
- 1 new occurrence of bug 14274
- 1 for a new occurence of 14177, 14294 and 14296
- 1 for the valgrind update he replied to on the list
- 1 failure because of a previous build failure

* 1 by Richard
- 1 for a build that was not for SWAT

* 2 by Michael
- 2 builds to test the infra

Regards,

--
Alexandre Belloni, co-owner and COO, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com

Hello Alejandro,

SWAT duty will rotate from Paul to you at the end of this Friday.

Please reply to let me know whether you will be able to work on this
task.

I'll be available to walk you through the process on Monday, don't
hesitate to contact me by email or on IRC.

Thanks!

--
Alexandre Belloni, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com

Hello,

Here are the statistics for last week. Oleksiy was on SWAT duty.

244 failures were triaged:

* 140 by Oleksiy
- 6 occurrences of new bug 14313
- 4 occurrences of new bug 14329
- 2 occurrences of new bug 14320
- 1 occurrence of new bug 14314
- 1 occurrence of new bug 14321
- 4 new occurrences of bug 14029
- 2 new occurrences of bug 14177
- 2 new occurrences of bug 14200
- 2 new occurrences of bug 14230
- 1 new occurrence of bug 13054
- 1 new occurrence of bug 13802
- 1 new occurrence of bug 14128
- 1 new occurrence of bug 14163
- 1 new occurrence of bug 14230
- 1 new occurrence of bug 14254
- 1 new occurrence of bug 14294
- 28 for an issue in util-linux
- 27 for an issue with a libglib-2.0 patch
- 7 for an issue with the run-postinsts patch
- 4 for reproducibility issues following a valgrind upgrade
- 3 for an issue with an mpv patch
- 36 builds cancelled with no other error
- 4 failures in meta-oe, not for SWAT

* 81 by Richard
- 81 for a in his own patch that he fixed

* 23 by me
- 23 builds cancelled with no other error

Regards,

--
Alexandre Belloni, co-owner and COO, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com

Hi Alexandre

Yes I'll take it this week. I'll happily take any tips on the new process 😊

Cheers
Paul

Hello Paul,

As Alejandro told me he will be out of office next week, you are the
next one on the list
(https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/Yocto_Build_Failure_Swat_Team#Members)
and SWAT duty will rotate from Saul to you at the end of this Friday.

Please reply to let me know whether you will be able to work on this
task.

I'll be available to walk you through the process on Monday, don't
hesitate to contact me by email or on IRC.

Thanks!

--
Alexandre Belloni, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com

Hello,

Here are the statistics for last week. Saul was on SWAT duty.

134 failures were triaged:

* 14 by Saul
- 11 for worker issues (out of disk space, sstate cleanup issue,
worker rebooted)
- 1 occurrence of new bug 14310
- 1 Köry already sent a mail for
- 1 failure in AUH, not for SWAT

* 114 by Richard
- 58 for a missing compat name he added back until the other layers
are updated
- 56 for a bb.debug2 issue he fixed

* 2 by Thomas Perrot
- 2 failures in meta-oe, not for SWAT

* 5 by me
- 2 new occurrences of bug 14200
- 3 failures in meta-oe, not for SWAT

This was a very quiet week!

Regards,

--
Alexandre Belloni, co-owner and COO, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com

Hello Oleksiy,

You are the next one on the list
(https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/Yocto_Build_Failure_Swat_Team#Members)
and SWAT duty will rotate from Saul to you at the end of this Friday.

Please reply to let me know whether you will be able to work on this
task.

I'll be available to walk you through the process on Monday, don't
hesitate to contact me by email or on IRC.

Thanks!

--
Alexandre Belloni, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com

Hello,

Here are the statistics for last week. Köry was on SWAT duty.

371 failures were triaged,

* 175 by Köry
- 56 for a gnu-uefi upgrade that broke systemd
- 31 for a createrepo-c upgrade patch that was then dropped from
master-next
- 29 for the util-linux patches Lucas is working on
- 12 for perf failures Bruce is working on
- 2 for the LTP reproducible issue, added to bug 14280, Richard took
care of that.
- 1 for a failure that was already fixed in master-next
- 1 failure because the worker was out of memory
- 1 failure in meta-oe Khem was working on.
- 1 failure because of the libxcrypt-compat update, Köry reported it on
the list
- 3 new occurrences of bug 14201
- 2 new occurrences of bug 14177
- 1 new occurrence of bug 13802
- 1 new occurrence of bug 14208
- 1 new occurrence of bug 14244
- 1 new occurrence of bug 14273
- 1 new occurrence of bug 14275
- 6 occurrences of new bug 14297
- 5 occurrences of new bug 14302
- 4 occurrences of new bug 14287
- 3 occurrences of new bug 14289
- 2 occurrences of new bug 14299
- 2 occurrences of new bug 14288
- 2 occurrences of new bug 14296
- 1 occurrence of new bug 14290
- 1 occurrence of new bug 14291
- 1 occurrence of new bug 14292
- 1 occurrence of new bug 14293
- 1 occurrence of new bug 14294
- 1 occurrence of new bug 14295
- 1 occurrence of new bug 14300

* 177 by Richard
- 75 for a file he didn't include in a commit
- 59 for a merge issue
- 35 for a warning he fixed
- 2 for the LTP reproducible issue he was working on
- 4 for a go-dep patch issue he reported on the list
- 2 for a base-files patch issue he answered on the list

* 19 by me
- 10 for the LTP reproducible issue, added to bug 14280, Richard took
care of that.
- 5 for a issue in meta-mingw following an oe-core update that was
fixed
- 1 occurrence of new bug 14284
- 1 new occurrence of bug 14197 that I reopened
- 1 failure in gatesgarth I ensure Anuj has seen
- 1 failure in meta-oe Khem was working on.

Regards,

--
Alexandre Belloni, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com

On 3/11/21 3:47 PM, Alexandre Belloni wrote:

Hello Saul,
You are the next one on the list
(https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/Yocto_Build_Failure_Swat_Team#Members)
and SWAT duty will rotate from Köry to you at the end of this Friday.

ACK!

I will look at things from the weekend -> next friday.

Sau!

Please reply to let me know whether you will be able to work on this
task.
I'll be available to walk you through the process on Monday, don't
hesitate to contact me by email or on IRC.
Thanks!

--
Sau!

Hello Saul,

You are the next one on the list
(https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/Yocto_Build_Failure_Swat_Team#Members)
and SWAT duty will rotate from Köry to you at the end of this Friday.

Please reply to let me know whether you will be able to work on this
task.

I'll be available to walk you through the process on Monday, don't
hesitate to contact me by email or on IRC.

Thanks!

--
Alexandre Belloni, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com

When all the pending builds have been annotated, basequery is empty and
basequery[pageobj.start_index()-1:pageobj.end_index()] is failing with a
"Negative indexing is not supported" exception. Instead, exit early by
rendering the page with empty results.

Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...>
---
swatapp/views.py | 8 ++++++--
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/swatapp/views.py b/swatapp/views.py
index 04048a5cbe7a..44be985d9512 100644
--- a/swatapp/views.py
+++ b/swatapp/views.py
@@ -48,6 +48,7 @@ def mainindex(request, indexfilter=None):
PERPAGE = 25

results = []
+ context = {}

if indexfilter == "swat":
failuresq = StepFailure.objects.filter(triage=TriageStatus.PENDING)
@@ -64,6 +65,11 @@ def mainindex(request, indexfilter=None):
dummyresults = list(range(0, itemnum))
paginator = Paginator(dummyresults, PERPAGE)
pageobj = paginator.get_page(page_number)
+ context['pageobj'] = pageobj
+
+ if itemnum == 0:
+ context['results'] = []
+ return render(request, 'swatapp/index.html', context)

# Only populate results for the entries we're going to display. Means
# we can't use paginator properly
@@ -98,9 +104,7 @@ def mainindex(request, indexfilter=None):
spancount += len(mainbuild_failures) + 1
results.append((collection, mainbuild, mainbuild_failures, subbuilds, spancount))

- context = {}
context['results'] = results
- context['pageobj'] = pageobj
return render(request, 'swatapp/index.html', context)

@login_required(login_url='/accounts/login/')
--
2.29.2

Hello,

Here are the statistics for last week. Anibal was on SWAT duty.

513 failures were triaged,

* 19 by Anibal
- 10 occurrences of new bug 14271
- 2 occurrences of new bug 14280
- 1 occurrence of new bug 14272
- 1 occurrence of new bug 14274
- 1 occurrence of new bug 14275
- 1 occurrence of new bug 14278
- 1 occurrence of new bug 14279
- 1 new occurrence of bug 12465
- 1 new occurrence of bug 13802

* 216 by Richard
- 216 he handled by replying on the mailing list

* 278 by me
- 160 for three different issues with the util-linux v6 patch that I
replied to.
- 30 for an issue with the gcc-sanitizers patch, I replied on list
- 18 were cancelled builds without any error
- 13 were already fixed in master at the time they were triaged
- 10 were meta-oe and out of scope of triage (and the issues were
already handled by Khem)
- 6 for rust issues Richard replied to.
- 3 for a binutils upgrade breaking meta-mingw Richard replied on
list
- 3 for reproducible failures Richard handled
- 3 for network timeouts (the worker lost internet access)
- 2 for SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH warnings because of old sstate
- 2 for worker configuration issues
- 1 was already handled by Joshua
- 1 was already handled by Steve
- 1 was unfortunately triaged too late to debug
- 1 occurrence of new bug 14262
- 1 occurrence of new bug 14263
- 4 new occurrences of bug 14158
- 4 new occurrences of bug 14164
- 3 new occurrences of bug 13802
- 2 new occurrences of bug 14200
- 2 new occurrences of bug 14201
- 2 new occurrences of bug 14228
- 1 new occurrence of bug 13992
- 1 new occurrence of bug 14018
- 1 new occurrence of bug 14029
- 1 new occurrence of bug 14190
- 1 new occurrence of bug 14230
- 1 new occurrence of both bug 14244 and bug 14164

Regards,

--
Alexandre Belloni, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com

Hello Alex,

On Fri, 5 Mar 2021 23:24:17 +0100
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...> wrote:

Hello Köry,

You are the next one on the list
(https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/Yocto_Build_Failure_Swat_Team#Members)
and SWAT duty will rotate from Anibal to you at then end of the day.

Acknowledged.

I'll be available to walk you through the process on Monday, don't
hesitate to contact me by email or on IRC.

Regards,

Köry

Hello Köry,

You are the next one on the list
(https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/Yocto_Build_Failure_Swat_Team#Members)
and SWAT duty will rotate from Anibal to you at then end of the day.

I'll be available to walk you through the process on Monday, don't
hesitate to contact me by email or on IRC.

Thanks!

--
Alexandre Belloni, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com

Hello,

Here are the statistics for last week. Both Leonardo was on SWAT duty.

225 failures were triaged,

* 34 by Leonardo
- 8 occurrences of new bug 14260
- 4 occurrences of new bug 14254
- 4 occurrences of new bug 14252
- 3 occurrences of new bug 14255
- 2 occurrences of new bug 14249
- 2 occurrences of new bug 14253
- 2 occurrences of new bug 14256
- 1 occurrence of new bug 14250
- 1 occurrence of new bug 14251
- 1 occurrence of new bug 14259
- 1 occurrence of new bug 14261
- 2 new occurrences of bug 14177
- 1 new occurrence of bug 13841
- 1 new occurrence of bug 14163
- 1 new occurrence of bug 14223

* 140 by Richard
- 54 for a failed push, he aborted the build
- 53 were cancelled builds without any error
- 8 for issues with SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH patches
- 4 for a broken bitbake event patch, handled later
- 4 for vim failure he reported on the list
- 4 for v2 of the Y2038 patch for wic he replied to
- 4 for warnings with v3 of the Y2038 patch for wic he replied to
- 3 for issues with a fitimage patch, reported on list
- 3 for an issue with a libcap-ng-patch he fixed
- 2 for a Y2038 patch for wic he replied to
- 1 for a worker configuration issue reported to Michael

* 51 by me
- 28 were cancelled builds without any error
- 8 were meta-oe and out of scope of triage (and the issues were
already handled by Khem)
- 2 for a Y2038 patch for wic Richard replied to
- 1 occurrence of new bug 14258
- 5 new occurrences of bug 14164
- 3 new occurrences of bug 14223
- 1 new occurrence of bug 14177
- 1 new occurrence of bug 14201
- 1 was both 14164 and 14223 reoccurring
- 1 was 14164, 14177 and 14223 reoccurring

Funny trivia, there were 34 cancelled builds without any error that were
triaged at exactly the same time by Richard and me.


Regards,

--
Alexandre Belloni, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com

Please, disregard that one, it is not complete.

--
Alexandre Belloni, co-owner and COO, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com

Hello,

Here are the statistics for last week. Both Leonardo was on SWAT duty.

225 failures were triaged,

* 34 by Leonardo
- 8 occurrences of new bug 14260
- 4 occurrences of new bug 14254
- 4 occurrences of new bug 14252
- 3 occurrences of new bug 14255
- 2 occurrences of new bug 14249
- 2 occurrences of new bug 14253
- 2 occurrences of new bug 14256
- 1 occurrence of new bug 14250
- 1 occurrence of new bug 14251
- 1 occurrence of new bug 14259
- 1 occurrence of new bug 14261
- 2 new occurrences of bug 14177
- 1 new occurrence of bug 13841
- 1 new occurrence of bug 14163
- 1 new occurrence of bug 14223

* 140 by Richard
- 54 for a failed push, he aborted the build
- 53 were cancelled builds without any error
- 8 for issues with SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH patches
- 4 for a broken bitbake event patch, handled later
- 4 for vim failure he reported on the list
- 4 for v2 of the Y2038 patch for wic he replied to
- 4 for warnings with v3 of the Y2038 patch for wic he replied to
- 3 for issues with a fitimage patch, reported on list
- 3 for an issue with a libcap-ng-patch he fixed
- 2 for a Y2038 patch for wic he replied to
- 1 for a worker configuration issue reported to Michael

* 2 by me
- 2 for a Y2038 patch for wic Richard replied to

Funny trivia, there were 34 cancelled builds without any error that were
triaged at exactly the same time by Richard and me.


Regards,

--
Alexandre Belloni, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com