|
Re: meta-agl check-layer failures
Our next branch seems to have been rebased/pushed to an old version last night, Jan-Simon and I will try to figure out what happened. I can push the previous state that I have, but I want to make
Our next branch seems to have been rebased/pushed to an old version last night, Jan-Simon and I will try to figure out what happened. I can push the previous state that I have, but I want to make
|
By
Scott Murray <scott.murray@...>
·
#306
·
|
|
meta-agl check-layer failures
Hello,
meta-agl is still failing check-layer-nightly on langdale builds because
of meta-pipewire:
ERROR: Layer meta-pipewire is not compatible with the core layer which only supports these series:
Hello,
meta-agl is still failing check-layer-nightly on langdale builds because
of meta-pipewire:
ERROR: Layer meta-pipewire is not compatible with the core layer which only supports these series:
|
By
Alexandre Belloni
·
#305
·
|
|
meta-virtualization check-layer-nightly failure
Hello,
python3-colorama has been upgraded once again and we now have a
check-layer-nightly failure.
AssertionError: Adding layer meta-virtualization changed signatures.
23 signatures changed,
Hello,
python3-colorama has been upgraded once again and we now have a
check-layer-nightly failure.
AssertionError: Adding layer meta-virtualization changed signatures.
23 signatures changed,
|
By
Alexandre Belloni
·
#304
·
|
|
Re: check-layer-nightly failures
actually, using dynamic layers might be the way to go.
-armin
actually, using dynamic layers might be the way to go.
-armin
|
By
Armin Kuster
·
#303
·
|
|
Re: check-layer-nightly failures
<alexandre.belloni@...> wrote:
That is correct.
meta-selinux has always been in the README as a dependency, it just
isn't in the layer.conf file.
I'm still deciding if I'm going to add it in
<alexandre.belloni@...> wrote:
That is correct.
meta-selinux has always been in the README as a dependency, it just
isn't in the layer.conf file.
I'm still deciding if I'm going to add it in
|
By
Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfield@...>
·
#302
·
|
|
check-layer-nightly failures
Hello,
check-layer-nightly is currently failing with:
ERROR: Nothing RPROVIDES 'selinux-python' (but
Hello,
check-layer-nightly is currently failing with:
ERROR: Nothing RPROVIDES 'selinux-python' (but
|
By
Alexandre Belloni
·
#301
·
|
|
Re: opensuse154-ty-2 mesa unpack failure log
lists.yoctoproject.org wrote:
Right, but it shouldn't have broken another build. I can see how it
probably happened, it should only move the file into place if the
checksum matches, not download into
lists.yoctoproject.org wrote:
Right, but it shouldn't have broken another build. I can see how it
probably happened, it should only move the file into place if the
checksum matches, not download into
|
By
Richard Purdie
·
#300
·
|
|
Re: opensuse154-ty-2 mesa unpack failure log
I think the issue is that the patch updated mesa to 22.1.7 but let
mesa-gl at 22.1.6 which creates the checksum error.
--
Alexandre Belloni, co-owner and COO, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel
I think the issue is that the patch updated mesa to 22.1.7 but let
mesa-gl at 22.1.6 which creates the checksum error.
--
Alexandre Belloni, co-owner and COO, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel
|
By
Alexandre Belloni
·
#299
·
|
|
Re: opensuse154-ty-2 mesa unpack failure log
I have an idea actually:
pokybuild@opensuse154-ty-2:~> ls /srv/autobuilder/autobuilder.yocto.io/current_sources/mesa-22.1.6.tar.xz* -la
-rw-r--r-- 1 pokybuild users 16071404 Aug 10 19:08
I have an idea actually:
pokybuild@opensuse154-ty-2:~> ls /srv/autobuilder/autobuilder.yocto.io/current_sources/mesa-22.1.6.tar.xz* -la
-rw-r--r-- 1 pokybuild users 16071404 Aug 10 19:08
|
By
Richard Purdie
·
#298
·
|
|
opensuse154-ty-2 mesa unpack failure log
https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/typhoon/#/builders/73/builds/5739/steps/12/logs/stdio
I had a look at the unpack log:
NOTE: Unpacking
https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/typhoon/#/builders/73/builds/5739/steps/12/logs/stdio
I had a look at the unpack log:
NOTE: Unpacking
|
By
Richard Purdie
·
#297
·
|
|
Re: bitbake master fails to parse meta-gem5
This is addressed by this patch
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/meta-arm/message/3684
which was pushed yesterday to the master branch. So, you should not
be seeing this anymore.
Thanks,
Jon
This is addressed by this patch
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/meta-arm/message/3684
which was pushed yesterday to the master branch. So, you should not
be seeing this anymore.
Thanks,
Jon
|
By
Jon Mason
·
#296
·
|
|
Re: binutils upgrade will break tf-a
Thanks for the headsup. The relevant upstreams are aware of this so we’ll pull their fix in as soon as it’s ready.
Ross
From:Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...>
Date: Wednesday, 17
Thanks for the headsup. The relevant upstreams are aware of this so we’ll pull their fix in as soon as it’s ready.
Ross
From:Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...>
Date: Wednesday, 17
|
By
Ross Burton
·
#295
·
|
|
binutils upgrade will break tf-a
Hello,
The upgrade to binutils 2.39 seems to cause the faollowing build
failure:
| aarch64-poky-linux-ld -o
Hello,
The upgrade to binutils 2.39 seems to cause the faollowing build
failure:
| aarch64-poky-linux-ld -o
|
By
Alexandre Belloni
·
#294
·
|
|
Re: [meta-arm] bitbake master fails to parse meta-gem5
This has already been fixed:
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/meta-arm/topic/93038429#3684
Denys
This has already been fixed:
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/meta-arm/topic/93038429#3684
Denys
|
By
Denys Dmytriyenko
·
#293
·
|
|
bitbake master fails to parse meta-gem5
Hello,
Since the change in how bitbake handle classes, meta-gem5 fails to
parse:
Parsing recipes...ERROR: ParseError at
Hello,
Since the change in how bitbake handle classes, meta-gem5 fails to
parse:
Parsing recipes...ERROR: ParseError at
|
By
Alexandre Belloni
·
#292
·
|
|
Re: New kernel_configcheck warnings in master
Yes, we are very aware, and our CI is failing because of this. I
_think_ recent changes to yocto-kernel-cache are causing this.
d2b8b81fd3798eb276e768c24b450e0012a31893
We also have testimage
Yes, we are very aware, and our CI is failing because of this. I
_think_ recent changes to yocto-kernel-cache are causing this.
d2b8b81fd3798eb276e768c24b450e0012a31893
We also have testimage
|
By
Jon Mason
·
#291
·
|
|
New kernel_configcheck warnings in master
Hello,
Since the latest kernel upgrade in master, the following warnings have
appeared:
WARNING: linux-yocto-5.19+gitAUTOINC+eb7088acca_43e6ab6ed0-r0 do_kernel_configcheck: [kernel config]:
Hello,
Since the latest kernel upgrade in master, the following warnings have
appeared:
WARNING: linux-yocto-5.19+gitAUTOINC+eb7088acca_43e6ab6ed0-r0 do_kernel_configcheck: [kernel config]:
|
By
Alexandre Belloni
·
#290
·
|
|
Re: check-layer-nightly failure
<alexandre.belloni@...> wrote:
docker-compose has a history of being sensitive to changes in this package.
Once again, I'll put on the record that we continue to ignore the lack
of an elegant
<alexandre.belloni@...> wrote:
docker-compose has a history of being sensitive to changes in this package.
Once again, I'll put on the record that we continue to ignore the lack
of an elegant
|
By
Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfield@...>
·
#289
·
|
|
check-layer-nightly failure
Hello,
Since python3-colorama got upgraded to 0.4.5 in meta-python,
check-layer-nightly is failing for meta-virtualization:
AssertionError: Adding layer meta-virtualization changed signatures.
23
Hello,
Since python3-colorama got upgraded to 0.4.5 in meta-python,
check-layer-nightly is failing for meta-virtualization:
AssertionError: Adding layer meta-virtualization changed signatures.
23
|
By
Alexandre Belloni
·
#288
·
|
|
Re: [OE-core] perl makefile race - any make experts who can help?
We can't have a conditional dependency like that, the task checksums as
implemented today wouldn't work and it would break ssttate reuse.
Cheers,
Richard
We can't have a conditional dependency like that, the task checksums as
implemented today wouldn't work and it would break ssttate reuse.
Cheers,
Richard
|
By
Richard Purdie
·
#287
·
|