|
Re: ltp failures on autobuilder
also:
IMAGE_CLASSES += "testimage"
QEMU_USE_KVM_qemux86-64 = "True"
Good news (for me) is that Randy and Paul can now reproduce this with the above
additional key pieces of config.
We have
also:
IMAGE_CLASSES += "testimage"
QEMU_USE_KVM_qemux86-64 = "True"
Good news (for me) is that Randy and Paul can now reproduce this with the above
additional key pieces of config.
We have
|
By
Richard Purdie
·
#169
·
|
|
Re: ltp failures on autobuilder
It became clear there is also an:
IMAGE_CLASSES += "testimage"
but the INHERIT people are using shouldn't make any real difference to
the test.
I've never seen that hrtimer message...
but I do
It became clear there is also an:
IMAGE_CLASSES += "testimage"
but the INHERIT people are using shouldn't make any real difference to
the test.
I've never seen that hrtimer message...
but I do
|
By
Richard Purdie
·
#168
·
|
|
Re: ltp failures on autobuilder
I tried to reproduce this on a Ubuntu-18.04.3 system with:
Linux ala-lpggp3 5.4.0-72-generic #80~18.04.1-Ubuntu SMP
Mon Apr 12 23:26:25 UTC 2021 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
Using
I tried to reproduce this on a Ubuntu-18.04.3 system with:
Linux ala-lpggp3 5.4.0-72-generic #80~18.04.1-Ubuntu SMP
Mon Apr 12 23:26:25 UTC 2021 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
Using
|
By
Randy MacLeod
·
#167
·
|
|
ltp failures on autobuilder
Noting down what we know about the ltp issue:
We've seen intermittent issues on the autobuilder where some ltp tests fail or
hang. I've been trying to figure out how to reproduce the issue and
Noting down what we know about the ltp issue:
We've seen intermittent issues on the autobuilder where some ltp tests fail or
hang. I've been trying to figure out how to reproduce the issue and
|
By
Richard Purdie
·
#166
·
|
|
Re: SWAT Rotation
I would be willing, but would appreciate any links to the process, as it'll be my first time doing it, and it's not entirely clear to me at this time. Thanks.
-Chris
I would be willing, but would appreciate any links to the process, as it'll be my first time doing it, and it's not entirely clear to me at this time. Thanks.
-Chris
|
By
Larson, Chris
·
#165
·
|
|
Re: SWAT Rotation
Hello Chris,
Would you be available next week for SWAT duty? Unfortunately, issues
did pile up this week... :/
Regards,
Alex
--
Alexandre Belloni, co-owner and COO, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and
Hello Chris,
Would you be available next week for SWAT duty? Unfortunately, issues
did pile up this week... :/
Regards,
Alex
--
Alexandre Belloni, co-owner and COO, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and
|
By
Alexandre Belloni
·
#164
·
|
|
Re: Failure in meta-aws check-layer
No problem, thanks for fixing it!
Cheers,
Richard
No problem, thanks for fixing it!
Cheers,
Richard
|
By
Richard Purdie
·
#163
·
|
|
Re: Failure in meta-aws check-layer
It's back in shape now. Sorry for the hassle.
--
Richard Elberger
Principal Technologist – IoT
Amazon Web Services
+1 646.927.6897
+1 203.942.8039 – mobile
elberger@... – email
It's back in shape now. Sorry for the hassle.
--
Richard Elberger
Principal Technologist – IoT
Amazon Web Services
+1 646.927.6897
+1 203.942.8039 – mobile
elberger@... – email
|
By
elberger@...
·
#162
·
|
|
Re: Failure in meta-aws check-layer
Thank you - will take care of it this morning. It’s related to the query I made to IRC yesterday. I will probably end up removing support from mainline for the recipe needing this.
Thank you - will take care of it this morning. It’s related to the query I made to IRC yesterday. I will probably end up removing support from mainline for the recipe needing this.
|
By
elberger@...
·
#161
·
|
|
Failure in meta-aws check-layer
Hi Richard,
https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/typhoon/#/builders/121/builds/73
showed up in overnight testing with an issue in meta-aws.
Cheers,
Richard
Hi Richard,
https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/typhoon/#/builders/121/builds/73
showed up in overnight testing with an issue in meta-aws.
Cheers,
Richard
|
By
Richard Purdie
·
#160
·
|
|
Re: qemux86-64 ltp kernel panic
Attached is v2.
This has .41 merged to v5.10/base and sets the appropriate SRCREV.
Bruce
--
- Thou shalt not follow the NULL pointer, for chaos and madness await
thee at its end
- "Use the force
Attached is v2.
This has .41 merged to v5.10/base and sets the appropriate SRCREV.
Bruce
--
- Thou shalt not follow the NULL pointer, for chaos and madness await
thee at its end
- "Use the force
|
By
Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfield@...>
·
#159
·
|
|
Re: qemux86-64 ltp kernel panic
<richard.purdie@...> wrote:
I remember about 10 years ago at Wind River, we had similar issues with ltp.
Are we running ltp under the root user ? or is it running as a regular user
<richard.purdie@...> wrote:
I remember about 10 years ago at Wind River, we had similar issues with ltp.
Are we running ltp under the root user ? or is it running as a regular user
|
By
Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfield@...>
·
#158
·
|
|
Re: qemux86-64 ltp kernel panic
Not sure. We have seen some builds fail but I haven't dived into properly
get down to the real cause. We run many more 64 builds than plain x86.
They're happening regularly enough to be really
Not sure. We have seen some builds fail but I haven't dived into properly
get down to the real cause. We run many more 64 builds than plain x86.
They're happening regularly enough to be really
|
By
Richard Purdie
·
#157
·
|
|
Re: qemux86-64 ltp kernel panic
Also, a hung qemu build, this one has been hanging for 3 days:
https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/typhoon/#/builders/95/builds/1963
Top of the kernel boot log for version info:
[ 0.000000]
Also, a hung qemu build, this one has been hanging for 3 days:
https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/typhoon/#/builders/95/builds/1963
Top of the kernel boot log for version info:
[ 0.000000]
|
By
Richard Purdie
·
#156
·
|
|
Re: qemux86-64 ltp kernel panic
Interesting.
The last two stalls/traps that you sent were both x86-64. Are we only
seeing this on x86 ?
I'll have another look at the patches we carry, but there really
shouldn't be anything that
Interesting.
The last two stalls/traps that you sent were both x86-64. Are we only
seeing this on x86 ?
I'll have another look at the patches we carry, but there really
shouldn't be anything that
|
By
Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfield@...>
·
#155
·
|
|
qemux86-64 ltp kernel panic
https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/typhoon/#/builders/95/builds/1969
died with the following kernel panic:
[ 2650.301002] option changes via remount are deprecated (pid=15940 comm=mount)
[
https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/typhoon/#/builders/95/builds/1969
died with the following kernel panic:
[ 2650.301002] option changes via remount are deprecated (pid=15940 comm=mount)
[
|
By
Richard Purdie
·
#154
·
|
|
VMs hanging with rcu stall problems
Not cross posted but mentioned here for info. Seeing if the qemu devs have any ideas.
Cheers,
Richard
Not cross posted but mentioned here for info. Seeing if the qemu devs have any ideas.
Cheers,
Richard
|
By
Richard Purdie
·
#153
·
|
|
qa-extras2 hang rcu/scheduling while atomic
https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/typhoon/#/builders/72/builds/3538
failure during execution of dnf --help
Traceback from qemu logs fro thre 5.10 kernel (full log attached):
qemux86-64 login: [
https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/typhoon/#/builders/72/builds/3538
failure during execution of dnf --help
Traceback from qemu logs fro thre 5.10 kernel (full log attached):
qemux86-64 login: [
|
By
Richard Purdie
·
#152
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH 0/4] Re-implement prserv on top of asyncrpc
<richard.purdie@...> wrote:
(╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻
If you're planning to take the day off don't worry about investigating
these. I'll take a look at the patches again on
<richard.purdie@...> wrote:
(╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻
If you're planning to take the day off don't worry about investigating
these. I'll take a look at the patches again on
|
By
Paul Barker <pbarker@...>
·
#151
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH 0/4] Re-implement prserv on top of asyncrpc
Hi Paul,
Thanks for these. Unfortunately I think there is still a gremlin somewhere
as this was included in an autobuilder test build that is showing as
Hi Paul,
Thanks for these. Unfortunately I think there is still a gremlin somewhere
as this was included in an autobuilder test build that is showing as
|
By
Richard Purdie
·
#150
·
|