Hello,

Here are the statistics for last week. Köry was on SWAT duty.

371 failures were triaged,

* 175 by Köry
- 56 for a gnu-uefi upgrade that broke systemd
- 31 for a createrepo-c upgrade patch that was then dropped from
master-next
- 29 for the util-linux patches Lucas is working on
- 12 for perf failures Bruce is working on
- 2 for the LTP reproducible issue, added to bug 14280, Richard took
care of that.
- 1 for a failure that was already fixed in master-next
- 1 failure because the worker was out of memory
- 1 failure in meta-oe Khem was working on.
- 1 failure because of the libxcrypt-compat update, Köry reported it on
the list
- 3 new occurrences of bug 14201
- 2 new occurrences of bug 14177
- 1 new occurrence of bug 13802
- 1 new occurrence of bug 14208
- 1 new occurrence of bug 14244
- 1 new occurrence of bug 14273
- 1 new occurrence of bug 14275
- 6 occurrences of new bug 14297
- 5 occurrences of new bug 14302
- 4 occurrences of new bug 14287
- 3 occurrences of new bug 14289
- 2 occurrences of new bug 14299
- 2 occurrences of new bug 14288
- 2 occurrences of new bug 14296
- 1 occurrence of new bug 14290
- 1 occurrence of new bug 14291
- 1 occurrence of new bug 14292
- 1 occurrence of new bug 14293
- 1 occurrence of new bug 14294
- 1 occurrence of new bug 14295
- 1 occurrence of new bug 14300

* 177 by Richard
- 75 for a file he didn't include in a commit
- 59 for a merge issue
- 35 for a warning he fixed
- 2 for the LTP reproducible issue he was working on
- 4 for a go-dep patch issue he reported on the list
- 2 for a base-files patch issue he answered on the list

* 19 by me
- 10 for the LTP reproducible issue, added to bug 14280, Richard took
care of that.
- 5 for a issue in meta-mingw following an oe-core update that was
fixed
- 1 occurrence of new bug 14284
- 1 new occurrence of bug 14197 that I reopened
- 1 failure in gatesgarth I ensure Anuj has seen
- 1 failure in meta-oe Khem was working on.

Regards,

--
Alexandre Belloni, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com

On 3/11/21 3:47 PM, Alexandre Belloni wrote:

Hello Saul,
You are the next one on the list
(https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/Yocto_Build_Failure_Swat_Team#Members)
and SWAT duty will rotate from Köry to you at the end of this Friday.

ACK!

I will look at things from the weekend -> next friday.

Sau!

Please reply to let me know whether you will be able to work on this
task.
I'll be available to walk you through the process on Monday, don't
hesitate to contact me by email or on IRC.
Thanks!

--
Sau!

Hello Saul,

You are the next one on the list
(https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/Yocto_Build_Failure_Swat_Team#Members)
and SWAT duty will rotate from Köry to you at the end of this Friday.

Please reply to let me know whether you will be able to work on this
task.

I'll be available to walk you through the process on Monday, don't
hesitate to contact me by email or on IRC.

Thanks!

--
Alexandre Belloni, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com

When all the pending builds have been annotated, basequery is empty and
basequery[pageobj.start_index()-1:pageobj.end_index()] is failing with a
"Negative indexing is not supported" exception. Instead, exit early by
rendering the page with empty results.

Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...>
---
swatapp/views.py | 8 ++++++--
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/swatapp/views.py b/swatapp/views.py
index 04048a5cbe7a..44be985d9512 100644
--- a/swatapp/views.py
+++ b/swatapp/views.py
@@ -48,6 +48,7 @@ def mainindex(request, indexfilter=None):
PERPAGE = 25

results = []
+ context = {}

if indexfilter == "swat":
failuresq = StepFailure.objects.filter(triage=TriageStatus.PENDING)
@@ -64,6 +65,11 @@ def mainindex(request, indexfilter=None):
dummyresults = list(range(0, itemnum))
paginator = Paginator(dummyresults, PERPAGE)
pageobj = paginator.get_page(page_number)
+ context['pageobj'] = pageobj
+
+ if itemnum == 0:
+ context['results'] = []
+ return render(request, 'swatapp/index.html', context)

# Only populate results for the entries we're going to display. Means
# we can't use paginator properly
@@ -98,9 +104,7 @@ def mainindex(request, indexfilter=None):
spancount += len(mainbuild_failures) + 1
results.append((collection, mainbuild, mainbuild_failures, subbuilds, spancount))

- context = {}
context['results'] = results
- context['pageobj'] = pageobj
return render(request, 'swatapp/index.html', context)

@login_required(login_url='/accounts/login/')
--
2.29.2

Hello,

Here are the statistics for last week. Anibal was on SWAT duty.

513 failures were triaged,

* 19 by Anibal
- 10 occurrences of new bug 14271
- 2 occurrences of new bug 14280
- 1 occurrence of new bug 14272
- 1 occurrence of new bug 14274
- 1 occurrence of new bug 14275
- 1 occurrence of new bug 14278
- 1 occurrence of new bug 14279
- 1 new occurrence of bug 12465
- 1 new occurrence of bug 13802

* 216 by Richard
- 216 he handled by replying on the mailing list

* 278 by me
- 160 for three different issues with the util-linux v6 patch that I
replied to.
- 30 for an issue with the gcc-sanitizers patch, I replied on list
- 18 were cancelled builds without any error
- 13 were already fixed in master at the time they were triaged
- 10 were meta-oe and out of scope of triage (and the issues were
already handled by Khem)
- 6 for rust issues Richard replied to.
- 3 for a binutils upgrade breaking meta-mingw Richard replied on
list
- 3 for reproducible failures Richard handled
- 3 for network timeouts (the worker lost internet access)
- 2 for SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH warnings because of old sstate
- 2 for worker configuration issues
- 1 was already handled by Joshua
- 1 was already handled by Steve
- 1 was unfortunately triaged too late to debug
- 1 occurrence of new bug 14262
- 1 occurrence of new bug 14263
- 4 new occurrences of bug 14158
- 4 new occurrences of bug 14164
- 3 new occurrences of bug 13802
- 2 new occurrences of bug 14200
- 2 new occurrences of bug 14201
- 2 new occurrences of bug 14228
- 1 new occurrence of bug 13992
- 1 new occurrence of bug 14018
- 1 new occurrence of bug 14029
- 1 new occurrence of bug 14190
- 1 new occurrence of bug 14230
- 1 new occurrence of both bug 14244 and bug 14164

Regards,

--
Alexandre Belloni, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com

Hello Alex,

On Fri, 5 Mar 2021 23:24:17 +0100
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...> wrote:

Hello Köry,

You are the next one on the list
(https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/Yocto_Build_Failure_Swat_Team#Members)
and SWAT duty will rotate from Anibal to you at then end of the day.

Acknowledged.

I'll be available to walk you through the process on Monday, don't
hesitate to contact me by email or on IRC.

Regards,

Köry

Hello Köry,

You are the next one on the list
(https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/Yocto_Build_Failure_Swat_Team#Members)
and SWAT duty will rotate from Anibal to you at then end of the day.

I'll be available to walk you through the process on Monday, don't
hesitate to contact me by email or on IRC.

Thanks!

--
Alexandre Belloni, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com

Hello,

Here are the statistics for last week. Both Leonardo was on SWAT duty.

225 failures were triaged,

* 34 by Leonardo
- 8 occurrences of new bug 14260
- 4 occurrences of new bug 14254
- 4 occurrences of new bug 14252
- 3 occurrences of new bug 14255
- 2 occurrences of new bug 14249
- 2 occurrences of new bug 14253
- 2 occurrences of new bug 14256
- 1 occurrence of new bug 14250
- 1 occurrence of new bug 14251
- 1 occurrence of new bug 14259
- 1 occurrence of new bug 14261
- 2 new occurrences of bug 14177
- 1 new occurrence of bug 13841
- 1 new occurrence of bug 14163
- 1 new occurrence of bug 14223

* 140 by Richard
- 54 for a failed push, he aborted the build
- 53 were cancelled builds without any error
- 8 for issues with SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH patches
- 4 for a broken bitbake event patch, handled later
- 4 for vim failure he reported on the list
- 4 for v2 of the Y2038 patch for wic he replied to
- 4 for warnings with v3 of the Y2038 patch for wic he replied to
- 3 for issues with a fitimage patch, reported on list
- 3 for an issue with a libcap-ng-patch he fixed
- 2 for a Y2038 patch for wic he replied to
- 1 for a worker configuration issue reported to Michael

* 51 by me
- 28 were cancelled builds without any error
- 8 were meta-oe and out of scope of triage (and the issues were
already handled by Khem)
- 2 for a Y2038 patch for wic Richard replied to
- 1 occurrence of new bug 14258
- 5 new occurrences of bug 14164
- 3 new occurrences of bug 14223
- 1 new occurrence of bug 14177
- 1 new occurrence of bug 14201
- 1 was both 14164 and 14223 reoccurring
- 1 was 14164, 14177 and 14223 reoccurring

Funny trivia, there were 34 cancelled builds without any error that were
triaged at exactly the same time by Richard and me.


Regards,

--
Alexandre Belloni, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com

Please, disregard that one, it is not complete.

--
Alexandre Belloni, co-owner and COO, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com

Hello,

Here are the statistics for last week. Both Leonardo was on SWAT duty.

225 failures were triaged,

* 34 by Leonardo
- 8 occurrences of new bug 14260
- 4 occurrences of new bug 14254
- 4 occurrences of new bug 14252
- 3 occurrences of new bug 14255
- 2 occurrences of new bug 14249
- 2 occurrences of new bug 14253
- 2 occurrences of new bug 14256
- 1 occurrence of new bug 14250
- 1 occurrence of new bug 14251
- 1 occurrence of new bug 14259
- 1 occurrence of new bug 14261
- 2 new occurrences of bug 14177
- 1 new occurrence of bug 13841
- 1 new occurrence of bug 14163
- 1 new occurrence of bug 14223

* 140 by Richard
- 54 for a failed push, he aborted the build
- 53 were cancelled builds without any error
- 8 for issues with SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH patches
- 4 for a broken bitbake event patch, handled later
- 4 for vim failure he reported on the list
- 4 for v2 of the Y2038 patch for wic he replied to
- 4 for warnings with v3 of the Y2038 patch for wic he replied to
- 3 for issues with a fitimage patch, reported on list
- 3 for an issue with a libcap-ng-patch he fixed
- 2 for a Y2038 patch for wic he replied to
- 1 for a worker configuration issue reported to Michael

* 2 by me
- 2 for a Y2038 patch for wic Richard replied to

Funny trivia, there were 34 cancelled builds without any error that were
triaged at exactly the same time by Richard and me.


Regards,

--
Alexandre Belloni, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com

Hello Anibal,

As discussed, at the end of the day.

I'll be available to walk you through the process on Monday, don't
hesitate to contact me by email or on IRC.

Thanks!

--
Alexandre Belloni, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com

On 24/02/2021 17:39:01-0600, Anibal Limon wrote:

On Wed, 24 Feb 2021 at 17:37, Anibal Limon via lists.yoctoproject.org
<anibal.limon=linaro.org@...> wrote:

On Wed, 24 Feb 2021 at 16:47, Alexandre Belloni <
alexandre.belloni@...> wrote:

On 24/02/2021 16:12:21-0600, Anibal Limon wrote:

On Wed, 24 Feb 2021 at 16:09, Alexandre Belloni <
alexandre.belloni@...> wrote:

Hello Anibal,

You are the next one on the list
(

https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/Yocto_Build_Failure_Swat_Team#Members)

and you ar scheduled to be on SWAT duty next week.

Ack,

If you are available, it would be beneficial for you to attend the bug
triage call this week. You'll find the Zoom call link and mor info on:
https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/Bug_Triage

I find the link in the page bu no datetime, when is the call?.

It's on Thursday, did you find it on
https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/YoctoCalendar ?

Yes I find it, times are in UTC, right?

I think they correspond to whatever timezone you have set in google
calendar. It is UTC+1 for me.

Just figure it out, times are in GMT - 8, I can attend first 30minutes of
the meeting.

That should be fine. To be extra sure, this is 15:30 UTC


--
Alexandre Belloni, co-owner and COO, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com

On 24/02/2021 16:12:21-0600, Anibal Limon wrote:

On Wed, 24 Feb 2021 at 16:09, Alexandre Belloni <
alexandre.belloni@...> wrote:

Hello Anibal,

You are the next one on the list
(https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/Yocto_Build_Failure_Swat_Team#Members)
and you ar scheduled to be on SWAT duty next week.

Ack,

If you are available, it would be beneficial for you to attend the bug
triage call this week. You'll find the Zoom call link and mor info on:
https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/Bug_Triage

I find the link in the page bu no datetime, when is the call?.

It's on Thursday, did you find it on
https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/YoctoCalendar ?

Name is YP Weekly Triage Meeting


--
Alexandre Belloni, co-owner and COO, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com

On 24/02/2021 23:09:25+0100, Alexandre Belloni wrote:

Hello Anibal,

You are the next one on the list
(https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/Yocto_Build_Failure_Swat_Team#Members)
and you ar scheduled to be on SWAT duty next week.

If you are available, it would be beneficial for you to attend the bug
triage call this week. You'll find the Zoom call link and mor info on:
https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/Bug_Triage

And I forgot to add, calendar is here:
https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/YoctoCalendar

--
Alexandre Belloni, co-owner and COO, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com

Hello Anibal,

You are the next one on the list
(https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/Yocto_Build_Failure_Swat_Team#Members)
and you ar scheduled to be on SWAT duty next week.

If you are available, it would be beneficial for you to attend the bug
triage call this week. You'll find the Zoom call link and mor info on:
https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/Bug_Triage

Thanks!

--
Alexandre Belloni, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com

Hello,

Here are the statistics for last week. Both Ross and Jagadheesan were on SWAT duty.

570 failures were reported,
* 79 were triaged by Jagadheesan
- 50 were not for SWAT but marked for SWAT
- 9 were cancelled builds with no other issue
- 3 reoccurrences of bug 14223
- 3 occurrences of new bug 14243
- 2 occurrences of new bug 14241
- 2 occurrences of new bug 14244
- 1 reoccurrence of bug 13802
- 1 reoccurrence of bug 14201
- 1 reoccurrence of bug 14206
- 1 reoccurrence of bug 14228
- 1 occurrence of new bug 14238
- 1 occurrence of new bug 14240
- 1 occurrence of new bug 14242
- 1 occurrence of new bug 14245
- 1 occurrence of new bug 14246
- 1 was a network failure on the worker

* 47 were triaged by Ross
- 35 occurrences of new bug 14234
- 6 were already fixed at the time they were triaged
- 3 reoccurrences of bug 14223
- 1 was not for SWAT
- 1 was a system configuration issue
- 1 was an autobuidler config issue (branch mismatch)

* 444 were triaged by Richard
- 142 for a patch failure he fixed
- 120 for a broken fix for nativesdk-dummy perl he updated
- 90 were cancelled builds with no other issue
- 36 for license errors he handled
- 24 for a linux-firmware issue reported by Khem on the list
- 7 for a license patch issue he handled
- 7 for an issue with the wpebackend-fdo upgrade
- 6 for a reproducibility issue in xorg
- 4 for a configuration issue in the reproducible target
- 4 for a reproducibility issue in cwautomacros
- 2 for a missing python3-git module on the worker
- 1 for a reproducibility issue in meson
- 1 for a reproducibility issue in vim

Regards,

--
Alexandre Belloni, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com