Re: Autobuilder reproducibility target changes

Alexander Kanavin <alex.kanavin@...>

On Sun, 14 Feb 2021 at 16:17, Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@...> wrote:
On Sun, 2021-02-14 at 16:04 +0100, Alexander Kanavin wrote:
> Cheers :) If there's something else I could help, tell.

I'm going to try and get diffs of the remaining big package differences
and see where we stand. The two big ones I know of are go as a language
for reproducibility and perf. Perf will just be a shear pain to fix,
hopefully the kernel will take patches.

I did a bit of work on the go reproducibility, that has been preserved here:

I got there, but it took quite a bit of time (debugging go build process is extremely painful) and I'm not at all happy with the hacky/brittle things in the patch, so it's on hold for now - but anyone is welcome to take it and make it better, especially if they're go specialists.


Join { to automatically receive all group messages.