|
Re: devtool modify docker failure
Hi,
I have made my yocto setup successfully.
The layers I have included is:
$ cat conf/bblayers.conf
${TOPDIR}/../poky/meta \
${TOPDIR}/../poky/meta-poky \
Hi,
I have made my yocto setup successfully.
The layers I have included is:
$ cat conf/bblayers.conf
${TOPDIR}/../poky/meta \
${TOPDIR}/../poky/meta-poky \
|
By
@AnandJE
·
#6433
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH v3] libvirt: uprev v6.3 -> v7.2
v3 looks better!
I did have it fail to apply to my master branch, so make sure that you are
on the tip of master (I pushed what I have to master-next for your reference).
I build with the 'xen'
v3 looks better!
I did have it fail to apply to my master branch, so make sure that you are
on the tip of master (I pushed what I have to master-next for your reference).
I build with the 'xen'
|
By
Bruce Ashfield
·
#6432
·
|
|
[PATCH v3] libvirt: uprev v6.3 -> v7.2
From: Yanfei Xu <yanfei.xu@...>
This upgrade spans 9 small release. The detailed realese logs could
refer to: https://gitlab.com/libvirt/libvirt/-/blob/master/NEWS.rst
Libvirt's
From: Yanfei Xu <yanfei.xu@...>
This upgrade spans 9 small release. The detailed realese logs could
refer to: https://gitlab.com/libvirt/libvirt/-/blob/master/NEWS.rst
Libvirt's
|
By
Xu, Yanfei
·
#6431
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH 3/3] xtf: update SRCREV and remove multilib dependency
Hi,
XTF is compiling properly in a project without multilib for x86_64.
Reviewed-by: Bertrand Marquis <bertrand.marquis@...>
Cheers
Bertrand
Hi,
XTF is compiling properly in a project without multilib for x86_64.
Reviewed-by: Bertrand Marquis <bertrand.marquis@...>
Cheers
Bertrand
|
By
Bertrand Marquis
·
#6430
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH 2/3] xen-tools: remove multilib build requirement for x86-64
Hi,
Reviewed-by: Bertrand Marquis <bertrand.marquis@...>
Cheers
Bertrand
Hi,
Reviewed-by: Bertrand Marquis <bertrand.marquis@...>
Cheers
Bertrand
|
By
Bertrand Marquis
·
#6429
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH 1/3] xen-tools: add patches for 4.14 to enable dropping multilib build
Hi Christopher,
This is really awesome, the multilib thing was really painful and it is nice to have a solution.
I reviewed and checked compilation of all versions of xen available for arm32, arm64
Hi Christopher,
This is really awesome, the multilib thing was really painful and it is nice to have a solution.
I reviewed and checked compilation of all versions of xen available for arm32, arm64
|
By
Bertrand Marquis
·
#6428
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH v2] libvirt: uprev v6.3 -> v7.2
You didn't miss anything, and the approach which you suggest works for me and is easier to use. Will use it in v3!
Thanks,
Yanfei
You didn't miss anything, and the approach which you suggest works for me and is easier to use. Will use it in v3!
Thanks,
Yanfei
|
By
Xu, Yanfei
·
#6427
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH 1/3] xen-tools: add patches for 4.14 to enable dropping multilib build
Yes, I am. I’d appreciate any test reports too.
Christopher
Yes, I am. I’d appreciate any test reports too.
Christopher
|
By
Christopher Clark
·
#6426
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH v2] libvirt: uprev v6.3 -> v7.2
I asked for some advice on this during a yocto weekly call today, and
Ross had some feedback (so I've added him here)
I'll try and summarize what we talked about, but I'm sure I'll mess it
up ..
I asked for some advice on this during a yocto weekly call today, and
Ross had some feedback (so I've added him here)
I'll try and summarize what we talked about, but I'm sure I'll mess it
up ..
|
By
Bruce Ashfield
·
#6425
·
|
|
Re: [hardknott][PATCH] containerd: fix CVE-2021-3121
In message: [meta-virtualization][hardknott][PATCH] containerd: fix CVE-2021-3121
on 20/04/2021 Trevor Gamblin wrote:
Thanks for the fix! I've queued it for hardknott.
Bruce
In message: [meta-virtualization][hardknott][PATCH] containerd: fix CVE-2021-3121
on 20/04/2021 Trevor Gamblin wrote:
Thanks for the fix! I've queued it for hardknott.
Bruce
|
By
Bruce Ashfield
·
#6424
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH 1/3] xen-tools: add patches for 4.14 to enable dropping multilib build
These look good to me.
I've queued them on master .. were you also interested in
getting them into hardknott ?
Bruce
In message: [meta-virtualization][PATCH 1/3] xen-tools: add patches for 4.14 to
These look good to me.
I've queued them on master .. were you also interested in
getting them into hardknott ?
Bruce
In message: [meta-virtualization][PATCH 1/3] xen-tools: add patches for 4.14 to
|
By
Bruce Ashfield
·
#6423
·
|
|
[hardknott][PATCH] containerd: fix CVE-2021-3121
The master branch contains an uprev for containerd that includes the
fix, so backport the patch separately for hardknott.
Tested by pulling a hello-world image with podman to
core-image-full-cmdline,
The master branch contains an uprev for containerd that includes the
fix, so backport the patch separately for hardknott.
Tested by pulling a hello-world image with podman to
core-image-full-cmdline,
|
By
Trevor Gamblin
·
#6422
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH 1/3] xen-tools: add patches for 4.14 to enable dropping multilib build
<christopher.w.clark@...> wrote:
Excellent!
The 32 bit multilib routinely terrorizes me when building Xen :D
Bruce
--
- Thou shalt not follow the NULL pointer, for chaos and madness
<christopher.w.clark@...> wrote:
Excellent!
The 32 bit multilib routinely terrorizes me when building Xen :D
Bruce
--
- Thou shalt not follow the NULL pointer, for chaos and madness
|
By
Bruce Ashfield
·
#6421
·
|
|
[PATCH 3/3] xtf: update SRCREV and remove multilib dependency
The latest Xen Test Framework has removed the gcc-multilib dependency.
Signed-off-by: Christopher Clark <christopher.w.clark@...>
---
recipes-extended/xen/xtf_git.bb | 21
The latest Xen Test Framework has removed the gcc-multilib dependency.
Signed-off-by: Christopher Clark <christopher.w.clark@...>
---
recipes-extended/xen/xtf_git.bb | 21
|
By
Christopher Clark
·
#6420
·
|
|
[PATCH 2/3] xen-tools: remove multilib build requirement for x86-64
Xen 4.15 added support for standalone x86-64 hvmloader build and
previous commit provided Xen 4.14 backports.
Signed-off-by: Christopher Clark <christopher.w.clark@...>
---
Xen 4.15 added support for standalone x86-64 hvmloader build and
previous commit provided Xen 4.14 backports.
Signed-off-by: Christopher Clark <christopher.w.clark@...>
---
|
By
Christopher Clark
·
#6419
·
|
|
[PATCH 1/3] xen-tools: add patches for 4.14 to enable dropping multilib build
Backport Xen patches to enable hvmloader to be built without needing
32-bit glibc.
Signed-off-by: Christopher Clark <christopher.w.clark@...>
---
...-stand-alone-set-of-headers-Xen-4.14.patch
Backport Xen patches to enable hvmloader to be built without needing
32-bit glibc.
Signed-off-by: Christopher Clark <christopher.w.clark@...>
---
...-stand-alone-set-of-headers-Xen-4.14.patch
|
By
Christopher Clark
·
#6418
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH v3 1/6] xen-tools: fix 32-bit x86 build by setting pvshim configure flags
Hi Bruce,
Thanks :-)
Cheers
Bertrand
Hi Bruce,
Thanks :-)
Cheers
Bertrand
|
By
Bertrand Marquis
·
#6417
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH v3 1/6] xen-tools: fix 32-bit x86 build by setting pvshim configure flags
<Bertrand.Marquis@...> wrote:
Bad push. Fixed now.
Bruce
--
- Thou shalt not follow the NULL pointer, for chaos and madness await
thee at its end
- "Use the force Harry" - Gandalf, Star Trek
<Bertrand.Marquis@...> wrote:
Bad push. Fixed now.
Bruce
--
- Thou shalt not follow the NULL pointer, for chaos and madness await
thee at its end
- "Use the force Harry" - Gandalf, Star Trek
|
By
Bruce Ashfield
·
#6416
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH v3 1/6] xen-tools: fix 32-bit x86 build by setting pvshim configure flags
Hi Bruce,
So right now on master there is no 4.14 anymore !
Can’t we keep it there ?
I am not sure i get why master-next has 4.14 but master does not anymore.
Regards
Bertrand
Hi Bruce,
So right now on master there is no 4.14 anymore !
Can’t we keep it there ?
I am not sure i get why master-next has 4.14 but master does not anymore.
Regards
Bertrand
|
By
Bertrand Marquis
·
#6415
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH v3 1/6] xen-tools: fix 32-bit x86 build by setting pvshim configure flags
<Bertrand.Marquis@...> wrote:
It's just the single patch on top of the master-next I just pushed.
I dropped the patch from master-next for now, and can re-apply it in a
month or so.
Bruce
--
-
<Bertrand.Marquis@...> wrote:
It's just the single patch on top of the master-next I just pushed.
I dropped the patch from master-next for now, and can re-apply it in a
month or so.
Bruce
--
-
|
By
Bruce Ashfield
·
#6414
·
|