meta-virtualization@lists.yoctoproject.org

Home Messages Hashtags Subgroups

Messages

Between

and

Re: [kirkstone][meta-virtualization][PATCH] ceph: upgrade v15.2.15 -> v15.2.17

I was going to suggest the same thing, an uprev is a good idea for master. I haven't started one yet, so feel free! Bruce -- - Thou shalt not follow the NULL pointer, for chaos and madness

By Bruce Ashfield · #7547 ·

Re: [kirkstone][meta-virtualization][PATCH] ceph: upgrade v15.2.15 -> v15.2.17

On the same note, ceph on master branch is also affected by the CVE's mentioned in this thread. Versions of ceph that contain the fix: v15.2.17, v16.2.10, v17.2.2, v17.2.3 I could send and upgrade

By sakib.sajal@... · #7546 ·

Re: [PATCH] netavark: init at 1.1.0

wrote: should the recipe to are installed They can be installed together and should, netavark is and will be the primary, and you must configure manually to use cni yet CNI and Netavark cannot be used

By Yocto · #7545 ·

Re: [PATCH] netavark: init at 1.1.0

likewise, that is what I was seeing as well. But I've been avoiding it (netavark) for CNI so far :) I can run my multi-container, multi-runtime tests against it at some point (I put all the runtimes,

By Bruce Ashfield · #7544 ·

Re: [PATCH] netavark: init at 1.1.0

Both can be installed in parallel. And from what I have seen if both are installed podman seems to prefer netavark. The backend can be mahually selected in the podman config

By Pascal Bach · #7543 ·

Re: [PATCH] netavark: init at 1.1.0

s/is replaces/is a replacement/ Since this can replace CNI, can they co-exist at the same time ? We should mention that in the commit message. If they both can't be active on the target at the same

By Bruce Ashfield · #7542 ·

[PATCH] netavark: init at 1.1.0

From: Pascal Bach <pascal.bach@...> Netavark is replaces cni for podman. The recipe is generated via cargo-bitbake. Modifications are done in netavark.inc to allow re-genrating the recipe

By Pascal Bach · #7541 ·

[PATCH] podman: replace GOBUILDFLAGS patch

From: Pascal Bach <pascal.bach@...> The GOBUILDFLAGS patch is replaced by explicitly setting BUILDFLAGS="${GOBUILDFLAGS}" in the recipe. Signed-off-by: Pascal Bach

By Pascal Bach · #7540 ·

Re: [PATCH] singularity: Skip recipe on musl builds

Well not orthogonal I would say but alternate solution to what this patch is trying to fix, if you remove glibc from the rdeps then this patch is not needed

By Khem Raj · #7539 ·

Re: [PATCH] singularity: Skip recipe on musl builds

It built alright but I didn't check any runtime behaviour. I do find this a bit orthogonal at this point but I've sent both patches so Bruce can pick any - both approaches are working for me. Andrei

By Andrei Gherzan · #7538 ·

[PATCH] singularity: Drop explicit runtime dep glibc

From: Andrei Gherzan <andrei.gherzan@...> There is no need we can see for this dependency to be provided as such - especially forcing this to using glibc. Signed-off-by: Andrei Gherzan

By Andrei Gherzan · #7537 ·

[kirkstone][PATCH] singularity: Drop explicit runtime dep glibc

From: Andrei Gherzan <andrei.gherzan@...> There is no need we can see for this dependency to be provided as such - especially forcing this to using glibc. Signed-off-by: Andrei Gherzan

By Andrei Gherzan · #7536 ·

Re: [kirkstone][meta-virtualization][PATCH] ceph: upgrade v15.2.15 -> v15.2.17

Thanks Joe! Bruce <joe.slater@...> wrote: -- - Thou shalt not follow the NULL pointer, for chaos and madness await thee at its end - "Use the force Harry" - Gandalf, Star Trek II

By Bruce Ashfield · #7535 ·

Re: [kirkstone][meta-virtualization][PATCH] ceph: upgrade v15.2.15 -> v15.2.17

The CVE fix I sent you is in the upgraded version of ceph. Joe

By Joe Slater · #7534 ·

Re: [PATCH] singularity: Skip recipe on musl builds

maybe that rdep on glibc is bogus. Its not normal to depends on glibc like that, in some cases e.g. locales etc it maybe that we need them but thats usually for ptests etc. can you try to remove the

By Khem Raj · #7533 ·

Re: [kirkstone][meta-virtualization][PATCH] ceph: upgrade v15.2.15 -> v15.2.17

I also have a pending patch from Joe Slater that addresses a different CVE on kirkstone. Can someone look and check if it is also covered by this uprev ? Ceph takes an incredibly long time to build

By Bruce Ashfield · #7532 ·

Re: [PATCH] singularity: Skip recipe on musl builds

I've tried to figure it out but I couldn't find anything

By Andrei Gherzan · #7531 ·

Re: [PATCH] singularity: Skip recipe on musl builds

do you know why is it marked as glibc only.

By Khem Raj · #7530 ·

Re: [PATCH] podman: update to v4.2.0

On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 8:58 AM Bruce Ashfield via lists.yoctoproject.org <bruce.ashfield=gmail.com@...> wrote: I just pushed part of my uprev's to master-next .. that being said,

By Bruce Ashfield · #7529 ·

Re: [PATCH] podman: update to v4.2.0

I had just tested the podman (and related version bumps) last night, but thanks for the patch! Bruce -- - Thou shalt not follow the NULL pointer, for chaos and madness await thee at its end - "Use

By Bruce Ashfield · #7528 ·

541 - 560 of 8081

Home Hashtags Subgroups Terms