|
Re: [PATCH] k3s: Add missing IP Virtual Server (ip_vs) feature to the kernel config
Hi Bruce,
OK, no problem, I will send an updated patch
Richard
Hi Bruce,
OK, no problem, I will send an updated patch
Richard
|
By
Richard Neill
·
#7173
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH 0/3] xen: Update recipes for xen and xen-tools
Hi Bruce,
Thanks.
For LTS, I think we said the strategy should be a bit different:
- keep the original versions and update them.
- keep the same default version
- add/update other recipe upon
Hi Bruce,
Thanks.
For LTS, I think we said the strategy should be a bit different:
- keep the original versions and update them.
- keep the same default version
- add/update other recipe upon
|
By
Bertrand Marquis
·
#7172
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH] libvmi: Fix out of box build failure with xen disabled
merged.
Bruce
In message: [meta-virtualization][PATCH] libvmi: Fix out of box build failure with xen disabled
on 13/04/2022 He Zhe wrote:
merged.
Bruce
In message: [meta-virtualization][PATCH] libvmi: Fix out of box build failure with xen disabled
on 13/04/2022 He Zhe wrote:
|
By
Bruce Ashfield
·
#7171
·
|
|
Re: [hardknott][PATCH] libvirt: fix CVE-2022-0897
merged.
Bruce
In message: [meta-virtualization] [hardknott][PATCH] libvirt: fix CVE-2022-0897
on 13/04/2022 Changqing Li wrote:
merged.
Bruce
In message: [meta-virtualization] [hardknott][PATCH] libvirt: fix CVE-2022-0897
on 13/04/2022 Changqing Li wrote:
|
By
Bruce Ashfield
·
#7170
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH] k3s: Add missing IP Virtual Server (ip_vs) feature to the kernel config
I'd actually prefer that the list not be sorted, at the same time as
we are adding to it.
Can you re-submit with just the new kernel module recommendations added.
Bruce
--
- Thou shalt not follow
I'd actually prefer that the list not be sorted, at the same time as
we are adding to it.
Can you re-submit with just the new kernel module recommendations added.
Bruce
--
- Thou shalt not follow
|
By
Bruce Ashfield
·
#7169
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH 0/3] xen: Update recipes for xen and xen-tools
FYI: I'm not ignoring these, and I will make sure they get into the
upcoming release branch and are in place for the LTS release. I'm just
waiting until Christopher gets a chance to review and see if
FYI: I'm not ignoring these, and I will make sure they get into the
upcoming release branch and are in place for the LTS release. I'm just
waiting until Christopher gets a chance to review and see if
|
By
Bruce Ashfield
·
#7168
·
|
|
[PATCH] libvmi: Fix out of box build failure with xen disabled
vbd was added for xen based VMs since
bdee00fac9b4 ("Disk reading interface for Xen based VMs and example")
and should be built only when xen is enabled, otherwise there would not be
necessary xen
vbd was added for xen based VMs since
bdee00fac9b4 ("Disk reading interface for Xen based VMs and example")
and should be built only when xen is enabled, otherwise there would not be
necessary xen
|
By
He Zhe
·
#7167
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH] k3s: Add missing IP Virtual Server (ip_vs) feature to the kernel config
Hi Bruce,
Could you please also backport this patch to the honister branch? Thanks!
Richard
Hi Bruce,
Could you please also backport this patch to the honister branch? Thanks!
Richard
|
By
Richard Neill
·
#7166
·
|
|
[PATCH] k3s: Add missing IP Virtual Server (ip_vs) feature to the kernel config
K3s (and Kubernetes) supports load balancing via IPVS, and by default rep=
orts
errors when IPVS kernel modules cannot be loaded.
This patch adds the missing reported kernel modules to the k3s
K3s (and Kubernetes) supports load balancing via IPVS, and by default rep=
orts
errors when IPVS kernel modules cannot be loaded.
This patch adds the missing reported kernel modules to the k3s
|
By
Richard Neill
·
#7165
·
|
|
[hardknott][PATCH] libvirt: fix CVE-2022-0897
From: Changqing Li <changqing.li@...>
Signed-off-by: Changqing Li <changqing.li@...>
---
.../libvirt/libvirt/CVE-2022-0897.patch | 57 +++++++++++++++++++
From: Changqing Li <changqing.li@...>
Signed-off-by: Changqing Li <changqing.li@...>
---
.../libvirt/libvirt/CVE-2022-0897.patch | 57 +++++++++++++++++++
|
By
Changqing Li
·
#7164
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH] libvirt: fix do_package issue
Just for the record, there is${nonarch_libdir} that expands to “/usr/lib” regardless of whether multilib is used or not. It is typically intended for cases like this.
//Peter
Just for the record, there is${nonarch_libdir} that expands to “/usr/lib” regardless of whether multilib is used or not. It is typically intended for cases like this.
//Peter
|
By
Peter Kjellerstedt
·
#7163
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH] libvirt: fix do_package issue
Hi Qi
You are right. My build configuration is also using multilib and this issue appeared.
Hi Qi
You are right. My build configuration is also using multilib and this issue appeared.
|
By
preeti.sachan@...
·
#7162
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH] libvirt: fix do_package issue
Hmm. Indeed. In that case, I'll go with a variant of the original patch, with a tweaked commit log. I'll take care of that now.
Bruce
--
- Thou shalt not follow the NULL pointer, for chaos and
Hmm. Indeed. In that case, I'll go with a variant of the original patch, with a tweaked commit log. I'll take care of that now.
Bruce
--
- Thou shalt not follow the NULL pointer, for chaos and
|
By
Bruce Ashfield
·
#7161
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH] libvirt: fix do_package issue
The only package I found which uses /usr/lib/sysctl.d is systemd.
It packages ${exec_prefix}/lib/sysctl.d.
And it has its reason. It treats /usr/lib as an arch-independent vendor dir, and $libdir is
The only package I found which uses /usr/lib/sysctl.d is systemd.
It packages ${exec_prefix}/lib/sysctl.d.
And it has its reason. It treats /usr/lib as an arch-independent vendor dir, and $libdir is
|
By
Chen Qi
·
#7160
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH] k3s: do not use a go file as patch
I've done multiple executions of that exact set of steps, and I've never seen the error you are encountering. Clearly there's something different in the various build environments.
We are also getting
I've done multiple executions of that exact set of steps, and I've never seen the error you are encountering. Clearly there's something different in the various build environments.
We are also getting
|
By
Bruce Ashfield
·
#7159
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH] libvirt: fix do_package issue
That's a larger issue, and it breaks other parts of the system. We shouldn't have anything with hard coded /usr/lib.
How are other packages dealing with this ?
In that case, I'll do individual scripts
That's a larger issue, and it breaks other parts of the system. We shouldn't have anything with hard coded /usr/lib.
How are other packages dealing with this ?
In that case, I'll do individual scripts
|
By
Bruce Ashfield
·
#7158
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH] libvirt: package all sysctl conf files for libvirtd
See the patch that I sent as well.
There's no reason to have /usr/lib anywhere in the packaging at all. We should just rely on ${libdir}, if libvirt is installing outside of the definition of
See the patch that I sent as well.
There's no reason to have /usr/lib anywhere in the packaging at all. We should just rely on ${libdir}, if libvirt is installing outside of the definition of
|
By
Bruce Ashfield
·
#7157
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH] libvirt: fix do_package issue
Hi Bruce,
Looking at the issue a little further, I found we need to use the hardcoded ‘/usr/lib’.
This is because sysctl is hardcoding that.
Some codes in sysctl.c from procps:
static
Hi Bruce,
Looking at the issue a little further, I found we need to use the hardcoded ‘/usr/lib’.
This is because sysctl is hardcoding that.
Some codes in sysctl.c from procps:
static
|
By
Chen Qi
·
#7156
·
|
|
[PATCH] libvirt: package all sysctl conf files for libvirtd
The libvirtd package has already packaged ${sysconfdir}/sysctl.d,
and also the /usr/lib/sysctl.d/60-libvirtd.conf, it would be
reasonable for it to package other sysctl conf files, otherwise
we will
The libvirtd package has already packaged ${sysconfdir}/sysctl.d,
and also the /usr/lib/sysctl.d/60-libvirtd.conf, it would be
reasonable for it to package other sysctl conf files, otherwise
we will
|
By
Chen Qi
·
#7155
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH] libvirt: fix do_package issue
I've pushed my WIP patch here:
https://git.yoctoproject.org/meta-virtualization/commit/?h=master-next
Bruce
--
- Thou shalt not follow the NULL pointer, for chaos and madness await thee at its end
-
I've pushed my WIP patch here:
https://git.yoctoproject.org/meta-virtualization/commit/?h=master-next
Bruce
--
- Thou shalt not follow the NULL pointer, for chaos and madness await thee at its end
-
|
By
Bruce Ashfield
·
#7154
·
|