Re: Docker and GPLv3

Mans Zigher


Well, does GPLv3 not require that a customer should be able to build
the GPLv3 like bash and deploy it to the target? It is not directly
secure-boot but the customer has a boot up sequence that starts with
secure boot and then the rootfs needs to be signed. So it would not be
possible to open up the device to allow a customer to deploy his own
version of bash on the target. But I might have misunderstood GPLv3. I
am not an expert.

Måns Zigher

Den fre 4 feb. 2022 kl 15:19 skrev Embedded Devel <yocto@...>:

On Friday 04 February 2022 15:53:42 PM (+07:00), Mans Zigher wrote:


A client of mine wants to have docker on it's product and they are
having secure boot enabled which prevents us from having any GPLv3
licensed code on the target.
Okay, wait, why does enabling secure-boot prevent including GPLv3 packages??
Ive never heard this before.

Join { to automatically receive all group messages.