|
[dunfell/master PATCH] ti-sci-fw: k3-image-gen: Revert SPL address change for mainline
Commit 02a2433c ("ti-sci-fw: Update image gen to latest") switched to a newer commit in k3-image-gen that also picked up TISCI firmware release, However, does include a change where the SPL address ch
Commit 02a2433c ("ti-sci-fw: Update image gen to latest") switched to a newer commit in k3-image-gen that also picked up TISCI firmware release, However, does include a change where the SPL address ch
|
By
Nishanth Menon
· #13882
·
|
|
[dunfell/master][PATCH 1/4] ti-sci-fw: Update imggen to release 08.00.00.001 tag
This series of updates has completely broken Upstream am64x support. I cant figure out (at least personally) how to make it work consistently. https://git.ti.com/cgit/k3-image-gen/k3-image-gen/commit/
This series of updates has completely broken Upstream am64x support. I cant figure out (at least personally) how to make it work consistently. https://git.ti.com/cgit/k3-image-gen/k3-image-gen/commit/
|
By
Nishanth Menon
· #13881
·
|
|
[PATCHv2] conf: am335x-evm: Add extlinux.conf support
OK. I see now. Thanks for explaining.
OK. I see now. Thanks for explaining.
|
By
Nishanth Menon
· #13838
·
|
|
[PATCHv2] conf: am335x-evm: Add extlinux.conf support
Does it make better if we do this in ti-soc.inc ?
Does it make better if we do this in ti-soc.inc ?
|
By
Nishanth Menon
· #13836
·
|
|
[dunfell/master][PATCH V3] linux-ti-staging: Add extra dtc flags to support dtb overlays
^^^ Arrgh, good catch - we are indeed missing am64.. I think we need to drop k2 platforms - they are just bitrotting.. Hmmm.. Your point is to get the weak assignment to allows the critical mach confs
^^^ Arrgh, good catch - we are indeed missing am64.. I think we need to drop k2 platforms - they are just bitrotting.. Hmmm.. Your point is to get the weak assignment to allows the critical mach confs
|
By
Nishanth Menon
· #13797
·
|
|
[dunfell/master][PATCH V3] linux-ti-staging: Add extra dtc flags to support dtb overlays
^^ You would want the default behavior as default dtb, not the bloated symbol loaded overlay capable dtb, no? [...] dtc changes are always incoming, does'nt make sense to keep that separated out?
^^ You would want the default behavior as default dtb, not the bloated symbol loaded overlay capable dtb, no? [...] dtc changes are always incoming, does'nt make sense to keep that separated out?
|
By
Nishanth Menon
· #13795
·
|
|
[dunfell/master][PATCH V2] linux-ti-staging: Add extra dtc flags to support dtb overlays
Might be worthwhile to add that enabling overlay support increases the size of the dtb, hence it is done at a platform level rather than globally to allow custom boards derived from meta-ti to not pay
Might be worthwhile to add that enabling overlay support increases the size of the dtb, hence it is done at a platform level rather than globally to allow custom boards derived from meta-ti to not pay
|
By
Nishanth Menon
· #13789
·
|
|
[dunfell/master][PATCH] linux-ti-staging: Added DTC_FLAG to Kernel argument to build dtbs with symbols
[...] Thinking again - should we make this a little easier in case the future dtc needs more flags? a) KERNEL_HAS_OVERLAYS as a single variable defined in machine.confs b) ti-kernel.inc which introduc
[...] Thinking again - should we make this a little easier in case the future dtc needs more flags? a) KERNEL_HAS_OVERLAYS as a single variable defined in machine.confs b) ti-kernel.inc which introduc
|
By
Nishanth Menon
· #13780
·
|
|
[dunfell/master PATCH] ti-uboot-staging: Update to the latest ti-u-boot-2021.01
Dont we need to fix up am64x- build?
Dont we need to fix up am64x- build?
|
By
Nishanth Menon
· #13779
·
|
|
[dunfell/master][PATCH] linux-ti-staging: Added DTC_FLAG to Kernel argument to build dtbs with symbols
70 characters wrap please. how about mainline? We dont need this comment every where, do we? Should'nt this be in a common file [...] I wonder if this comes here. KERNEL_EXTRA_ARGS += "${EXTRA_DTC_FLA
70 characters wrap please. how about mainline? We dont need this comment every where, do we? Should'nt this be in a common file [...] I wonder if this comes here. KERNEL_EXTRA_ARGS += "${EXTRA_DTC_FLA
|
By
Nishanth Menon
· #13778
·
|
|
[dunfell PATCH V2] recipes-kernel: perf: Add a perf.bbappend to handle RDEPENDS on newer kernel
Commit 159cdb159ad0 ("perf-tests: add bash into RDEPENDS (v5.12-rc5+)") in upstream openembedded-core layer. Copying over a snippet of description over: Commit 1dc481c0b0cf perf test: Change to use ba
Commit 159cdb159ad0 ("perf-tests: add bash into RDEPENDS (v5.12-rc5+)") in upstream openembedded-core layer. Copying over a snippet of description over: Commit 1dc481c0b0cf perf test: Change to use ba
|
By
Nishanth Menon
· #13772
·
|
|
[dunfell PATCH] recipes-kernel: perf: Add a perf.bbappend to handle RDEPENDS on newer kernel
On 19:26-20210503, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: [..] > > > +RDEPENDS_${PN}-tests =+ "bash" > > Come to think of it, you might want to guard this change to meta-ti platforms: > > +RDEPENDS_${PN}-tests_ti-s
On 19:26-20210503, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: [..] > > > +RDEPENDS_${PN}-tests =+ "bash" > > Come to think of it, you might want to guard this change to meta-ti platforms: > > +RDEPENDS_${PN}-tests_ti-s
|
By
Nishanth Menon
· #13771
·
|
|
[dunfell PATCH] recipes-kernel: perf: Add a perf.bbappend to handle RDEPENDS on newer kernel
Commit 159cdb159ad0 ("perf-tests: add bash into RDEPENDS (v5.12-rc5+)") in upstream openembedded-core layer. Copying over a snippet of description over: Commit 1dc481c0b0cf perf test: Change to use ba
Commit 159cdb159ad0 ("perf-tests: add bash into RDEPENDS (v5.12-rc5+)") in upstream openembedded-core layer. Copying over a snippet of description over: Commit 1dc481c0b0cf perf test: Change to use ba
|
By
Nishanth Menon
· #13768
·
|
|
[dunfell/master PATCH] linux-ti-mainline: Bump kernel version to v5.12
And lets work with the latest kernel Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@...> --- recipes-kernel/linux/linux-ti-mainline_git.bb | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a
And lets work with the latest kernel Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@...> --- recipes-kernel/linux/linux-ti-mainline_git.bb | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a
|
By
Nishanth Menon
· #13749
·
|
|
[dunfell/master PATCH] recipes-bsp: u-boot-ti-mainline: Update to v2021.04 release
Update u-boot recipe to be on the bleeding upstream tag. While at it, also update the u-boot source url to point to the new server as per [1]. While it may be redundant, lets document the usage of URI
Update u-boot recipe to be on the bleeding upstream tag. While at it, also update the u-boot source url to point to the new server as per [1]. While it may be redundant, lets document the usage of URI
|
By
Nishanth Menon
· #13748
·
|
|
[dunfell/master PATCH 3/3] AM64x Unification: Update ti-sci-fw recipe
since meta-yocto, meta-arago etc use the same meta-ti layer, Could you explain how, in meta-arago/meta-ti am I generating two different wic files with the current patch series? I am probably missing s
since meta-yocto, meta-arago etc use the same meta-ti layer, Could you explain how, in meta-arago/meta-ti am I generating two different wic files with the current patch series? I am probably missing s
|
By
Nishanth Menon
· #13688
·
|
|
[dunfell/master PATCH V2] recipes-bsp: u-boot-ti-mainline: Update to v2021.04 release
Update u-boot recipe to be on the bleeding upstream tag. While at it, also update the u-boot source url to point to the new server as per [1]. [1] https://source.denx.de/u-boot/u-boot/-/commit/a3bbd0b
Update u-boot recipe to be on the bleeding upstream tag. While at it, also update the u-boot source url to point to the new server as per [1]. [1] https://source.denx.de/u-boot/u-boot/-/commit/a3bbd0b
|
By
Nishanth Menon
· #13683
·
|
|
[dunfell/master PATCH] recipes-bsp: u-boot-ti-mainline: Update to v2021.04 release
aah, yes, thanks for pointing it out. v2 incoming.
aah, yes, thanks for pointing it out. v2 incoming.
|
By
Nishanth Menon
· #13682
·
|
|
[dunfell/master PATCH] recipes-bsp: u-boot-ti-mainline: Update to v2021.04 release
Update u-boot recipe to be on the bleeding upstream tag. Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@...> --- recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-ti-mainline_git.bb | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletion
Update u-boot recipe to be on the bleeding upstream tag. Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@...> --- recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-ti-mainline_git.bb | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletion
|
By
Nishanth Menon
· #13680
·
|
|
[dunfell/master PATCH 3/3] AM64x Unification: Update ti-sci-fw recipe
s/Updtae/Update/ Why are we doing this? What happens to the wic file image? What is the out of box experience for someone creating an SD image -> flash the image then modify the sd card? how would tha
s/Updtae/Update/ Why are we doing this? What happens to the wic file image? What is the out of box experience for someone creating an SD image -> flash the image then modify the sd card? how would tha
|
By
Nishanth Menon
· #13656
·
|