|
[master/dunfell][PATCH 1/2] conf: dra7xx-evm: ReIntroduce existent dtb* for 5.10
This reverts commit 8bdfe1413c00e0c55132989dafcf8d91827999c3.
Introduces existent dtb and dtbo for dra7x
Signed-off-by: Yogesh Siraswar <yogeshs@...>
---
conf/machine/dra7xx-evm.conf | 11
This reverts commit 8bdfe1413c00e0c55132989dafcf8d91827999c3.
Introduces existent dtb and dtbo for dra7x
Signed-off-by: Yogesh Siraswar <yogeshs@...>
---
conf/machine/dra7xx-evm.conf | 11
|
By
Yogesh Siraswar
·
#14022
·
|
|
[master/dunfell][PATCH 0/2] ReIntroduce missing dtb
Add missing dtb and dtbo for am57xx and dra7xx.
Yogesh Siraswar (2):
conf: dra7xx-evm: ReIntroduce existent dtb* for 5.10
conf: am57xx-evm: ReIntroduce existent dtb* for 5.10
Add missing dtb and dtbo for am57xx and dra7xx.
Yogesh Siraswar (2):
conf: dra7xx-evm: ReIntroduce existent dtb* for 5.10
conf: am57xx-evm: ReIntroduce existent dtb* for 5.10
|
By
Yogesh Siraswar
·
#14021
·
|
|
[master/dunfell][PATCH 2/2] conf: am57xx-evm: ReIntroduce existent dtb* for 5.10
This reverts commit 43bf0f36a3ac62cc3378688358ba704a27b501ce.
Added dtb and dtbo for am57xx
Signed-off-by: Yogesh Siraswar <yogeshs@...>
---
conf/machine/am57xx-evm.conf | 7 ++++++-
1 file
This reverts commit 43bf0f36a3ac62cc3378688358ba704a27b501ce.
Added dtb and dtbo for am57xx
Signed-off-by: Yogesh Siraswar <yogeshs@...>
---
conf/machine/am57xx-evm.conf | 7 ++++++-
1 file
|
By
Yogesh Siraswar
·
#14020
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH] meta-ti: Fix several errors introduced during override syntax changes
Missing Signed-off-by: line, but here it is - should be added by patchwork.
Signed-off-by: Phil Sutherland <phil@...>
Looks good to me.
Reviewed-by: Denys Dmytriyenko
Missing Signed-off-by: line, but here it is - should be added by patchwork.
Signed-off-by: Phil Sutherland <phil@...>
Looks good to me.
Reviewed-by: Denys Dmytriyenko
|
By
Denys Dmytriyenko
·
#14019
·
|
|
[PATCH] meta-ti: Fix several errors introduced during override syntax changes
---
.../devtools/gcc-linaro-baremetal-aarch64-native.bb | 4 ++--
recipes-ti/devtools/gcc-linaro-baremetal-native.bb | 4 ++--
recipes-ti/devtools/ti-cgt-arm_18.12.5.bb |
---
.../devtools/gcc-linaro-baremetal-aarch64-native.bb | 4 ++--
recipes-ti/devtools/gcc-linaro-baremetal-native.bb | 4 ++--
recipes-ti/devtools/ti-cgt-arm_18.12.5.bb |
|
By
Phil Sutherland
·
#14018
·
|
|
Re: [meta-arago][PATCH] qtwebengine: replace patch with chromium flags
Hi Denys,
I subscribed, but I did not receive any confirmation email (yet?). Can you
forward the patch to the meta-arago mailing list in the meantime?
Thanks,
Vivien
Hi Denys,
I subscribed, but I did not receive any confirmation email (yet?). Can you
forward the patch to the meta-arago mailing list in the meantime?
Thanks,
Vivien
|
By
Vivien Didelot
·
#14017
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH] meta-ti: Fix several errors introduced during override syntax changes
Phil,
Thanks again for the patch, but the description above is not appropriate. This
will go into git history and should rather describe the change. Any other
comments that you wouldn't want
Phil,
Thanks again for the patch, but the description above is not appropriate. This
will go into git history and should rather describe the change. Any other
comments that you wouldn't want
|
By
Denys Dmytriyenko
·
#14016
·
|
|
Re: [meta-arago][PATCH] qtwebengine: replace patch with chromium flags
Hi,
meta-ti is the wrong mailing list for this patch. Please send it to meta-arago
instead.
--
Denys
Hi,
meta-ti is the wrong mailing list for this patch. Please send it to meta-arago
instead.
--
Denys
|
By
Denys Dmytriyenko
·
#14015
·
|
|
[meta-arago][PATCH] qtwebengine: replace patch with chromium flags
Instead of maintaining an inappropriate hack on qtwebengine to disable
seccomp filter sandbox, export the corresponding chromium flag in
the QTWEBENGINE_CHROMIUM_FLAGS environment
Instead of maintaining an inappropriate hack on qtwebengine to disable
seccomp filter sandbox, export the corresponding chromium flag in
the QTWEBENGINE_CHROMIUM_FLAGS environment
|
By
Vivien Didelot
·
#14014
·
|
|
Re: jailhouse recipe removed for all platforms?
All features supported in processor SDK are maintained in the meta-ti recipes.
Currently Jailhouse is not officially supported in processor SDKs for any of the platforms.
Hence the recipe was
All features supported in processor SDK are maintained in the meta-ti recipes.
Currently Jailhouse is not officially supported in processor SDKs for any of the platforms.
Hence the recipe was
|
By
Nikhil Devshatwar <nikhil.nd@...>
·
#14013
·
|
|
[PATCH] meta-ti: Fix several errors introduced during override syntax changes
Same patch as before, but hopefully in a more usable form.
Cheers
phil
---
.../devtools/gcc-linaro-baremetal-aarch64-native.bb | 4 ++--
recipes-ti/devtools/gcc-linaro-baremetal-native.bb
Same patch as before, but hopefully in a more usable form.
Cheers
phil
---
.../devtools/gcc-linaro-baremetal-aarch64-native.bb | 4 ++--
recipes-ti/devtools/gcc-linaro-baremetal-native.bb
|
By
Phil Sutherland
·
#14012
·
|
|
jailhouse recipe removed for all platforms?
It appears that the jailhouse recipe was removed at Dunfell (latest release in meta-ti) in 2021:
commit d8e96545f10bd2057b665a1e0c363f60f0a8cda5 Author: Nikhil Devshatwar <nikhil.nd@...> Date: Tue Jun
It appears that the jailhouse recipe was removed at Dunfell (latest release in meta-ti) in 2021:
commit d8e96545f10bd2057b665a1e0c363f60f0a8cda5 Author: Nikhil Devshatwar <nikhil.nd@...> Date: Tue Jun
|
By
Alan D Kozlay
·
#14011
·
|
|
Re: Append syntax patch, and hardknott compatibility
Phil,
Thank you for your patch! The change looks correct, as those were all false
positives converted by the automated script and missed during manual review.
Could you please resend the patch
Phil,
Thank you for your patch! The change looks correct, as those were all false
positives converted by the automated script and missed during manual review.
Could you please resend the patch
|
By
Denys Dmytriyenko
·
#14010
·
|
|
Append syntax patch, and hardknott compatibility
Greetings all,
Attached is a patch which fixes several file and module naming errors introduced by the recent honister append syntax changes. The specific one which bit me is in the ti-cgt-pru recipe,
Greetings all,
Attached is a patch which fixes several file and module naming errors introduced by the recent honister append syntax changes. The specific one which bit me is in the ti-cgt-pru recipe,
|
By
Phil Sutherland
·
#14009
·
|
|
Re: ROOT LOGIN ISSUE of K2g (Yocto- meta-TI (version : ROCKO))
[1] I'd be guessing, but = instead of ?=
^^ weird "can't set" message..
meta-ti does'nt set the password for poky.
[1]
[1] I'd be guessing, but = instead of ?=
^^ weird "can't set" message..
meta-ti does'nt set the password for poky.
[1]
|
By
Nishanth Menon
·
#14008
·
|
|
ROOT LOGIN ISSUE of K2g (Yocto- meta-TI (version : ROCKO))
Hi,
I have used meta-ti layer (Version :Rocko ) to generate core-image-minimal for my 66ak2g12 board from TI. I’m able to boot up my board properly but after booting up not able to
Hi,
I have used meta-ti layer (Version :Rocko ) to generate core-image-minimal for my 66ak2g12 board from TI. I’m able to boot up my board properly but after booting up not able to
|
By
asif.malek@...
·
#14007
·
|
|
[dunfell/master PATCH] linux-ti-staging: Update 5.10 kernel to 5.10.59
From: Praneeth Bajjuri <praneeth@...>
Update linux 5.10 to 5.10.59 stable
Signed-off-by: Praneeth Bajjuri <praneeth@...>
---
recipes-kernel/linux/linux-ti-staging-rt_5.10.bb | 4 ++--
From: Praneeth Bajjuri <praneeth@...>
Update linux 5.10 to 5.10.59 stable
Signed-off-by: Praneeth Bajjuri <praneeth@...>
---
recipes-kernel/linux/linux-ti-staging-rt_5.10.bb | 4 ++--
|
By
praneeth
·
#14006
·
|
|
Re: multilib32: libtool-cross_2.4.6.bb configure failure
Hi Nir,
Sorry for delayed response. Currently our SDK do not support multi-lib
and we do not have any timeline when it will be supported.
Thanks
Yogesh
Hi Nir,
Sorry for delayed response. Currently our SDK do not support multi-lib
and we do not have any timeline when it will be supported.
Thanks
Yogesh
|
By
Yogesh Siraswar
·
#14005
·
|
|
multilib32: libtool-cross_2.4.6.bb configure failure
Hi There,
Following the instruction from TI
https://software-dl.ti.com/processor-sdk-linux-rt/esd/AM64X/latest/exports/docs/linux/Overview_Building_the_SDK.html
I’ve successfully set up
Hi There,
Following the instruction from TI
https://software-dl.ti.com/processor-sdk-linux-rt/esd/AM64X/latest/exports/docs/linux/Overview_Building_the_SDK.html
I’ve successfully set up
|
By
Geller, Nir <nir.geller@...>
·
#14004
·
|
|
Re: [dunfell/master][PATCH] ti-uboot-staging: Update to the latest ti-u-boot-2021.01
NAK
We are not making any intermediate update to u-boot commit id.
All the commit ID are tied to core sdk releases.
If you want to use the latest or use the above commit ID please
use bleeding or
NAK
We are not making any intermediate update to u-boot commit id.
All the commit ID are tied to core sdk releases.
If you want to use the latest or use the above commit ID please
use bleeding or
|
By
Yogesh Siraswar
·
#14003
·
|