|
[dunfell][PATCH] powervr-drivers: teach modules_install to respect "usrmerge" distro feature
From: Denys Dmytriyenko <denys@...>
https://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd/TheCaseForTheUsrMerge/
When "usrmerge" distro feature is enabled, root directories /bin, /sbin,
From: Denys Dmytriyenko <denys@...>
https://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd/TheCaseForTheUsrMerge/
When "usrmerge" distro feature is enabled, root directories /bin, /sbin,
|
By
Denys Dmytriyenko
·
#14062
·
|
|
Re: ti-sgx-ddk-km proper toolchain detection
Hi Denys,
Now I'm seeing some level of negativity :-)
That's the whole purpose of this thread, this is why I am pointing this
sgx patch as an example for the consequences for zeroing the ABI
Hi Denys,
Now I'm seeing some level of negativity :-)
That's the whole purpose of this thread, this is why I am pointing this
sgx patch as an example for the consequences for zeroing the ABI
|
By
Vivien Didelot
·
#14061
·
|
|
Re: ti-sgx-ddk-km: module installed but not shipped
No regressions - this part hasn't change forever. The internal Makefile
framework in SGX and RGX packages is very generic and convoluted, plus
somewhat old and outdated - it has no knowledge of
No regressions - this part hasn't change forever. The internal Makefile
framework in SGX and RGX packages is very generic and convoluted, plus
somewhat old and outdated - it has no knowledge of
|
By
Denys Dmytriyenko
·
#14060
·
|
|
Re: ti-sgx-ddk-km proper toolchain detection
Sure, try convincing upstream OE maintainers and the Community at large.
I completely understand the trouble, but as mentioned above, those are not
*upstream* toolchain vendors relative to meta-ti,
Sure, try convincing upstream OE maintainers and the Community at large.
I completely understand the trouble, but as mentioned above, those are not
*upstream* toolchain vendors relative to meta-ti,
|
By
Denys Dmytriyenko
·
#14059
·
|
|
ti-sgx-ddk-km: module installed but not shipped
Hi,
With latest master(s), ti-sgx-ddk-km fails with:
ERROR: ti-sgx-ddk-km-1.17.4948957-r22x do_package: QA Issue: ti-sgx-ddk-km: Files/directories were installed but not shipped in any package:
Hi,
With latest master(s), ti-sgx-ddk-km fails with:
ERROR: ti-sgx-ddk-km-1.17.4948957-r22x do_package: QA Issue: ti-sgx-ddk-km: Files/directories were installed but not shipped in any package:
|
By
Vivien Didelot
·
#14058
·
|
|
[master/dunfell][PATCH v3] ti-linux-fw: Support common inc for all firmware
Change to support common INC for all firmware
This will help with:
1) Eliminating requirement to change multiple recipes for firmware
update
2) This will help support AUTOREV
Signed-off-by: Yogesh
Change to support common INC for all firmware
This will help with:
1) Eliminating requirement to change multiple recipes for firmware
update
2) This will help support AUTOREV
Signed-off-by: Yogesh
|
By
Yogesh Siraswar
·
#14057
·
|
|
Re: ti-sgx-ddk-km proper toolchain detection
Hi Denys,
The comment in cross-canadian.bbclass literally states "This is a bit ugly."
I'm only talking about code here and did not mean any attack.
My point exactly, we shouldn't be adding non-hf
Hi Denys,
The comment in cross-canadian.bbclass literally states "This is a bit ugly."
I'm only talking about code here and did not mean any attack.
My point exactly, we shouldn't be adding non-hf
|
By
Vivien Didelot
·
#14056
·
|
|
Re: [master/dunfell][PATCH v2] ti-linux-fw: Support common inc for all firmware
This is a good first step in the right direction!
In the future, should probably consider folding it all the way to
linux-firmware recipe... There are some considerations there though.
Reviewed-by:
This is a good first step in the right direction!
In the future, should probably consider folding it all the way to
linux-firmware recipe... There are some considerations there though.
Reviewed-by:
|
By
Denys Dmytriyenko
·
#14055
·
|
|
Re: ti-sgx-ddk-km proper toolchain detection
I'm seeing some level of negativity in this email - everything is ugly. At
least it's not personal, which is good. But asking for help with an attack
may not be very wise. Just saying... :)
Anyway,
I'm seeing some level of negativity in this email - everything is ugly. At
least it's not personal, which is good. But asking for help with an attack
may not be very wise. Just saying... :)
Anyway,
|
By
Denys Dmytriyenko
·
#14054
·
|
|
ti-sgx-ddk-km proper toolchain detection
Hi all,
I've, like many, run into the issue of toolchain detection for the
ti-sgx-ddk-km driver. I've noticed the ugly patch [1] getting edited to
add new toolchains like arm-oe-linux-gnueabi and
Hi all,
I've, like many, run into the issue of toolchain detection for the
ti-sgx-ddk-km driver. I've noticed the ugly patch [1] getting edited to
add new toolchains like arm-oe-linux-gnueabi and
|
By
Vivien Didelot
·
#14053
·
|
|
Re: [EXTERNAL] [meta-ti][master/dunfell][PATCH v2] ti-linux-fw: Support common inc for all firmware
Yes, Vignesh also pointed that. Will fix in the next version.
SR1 and SR2 will be consistent with use of AM65X and not AM65x in next
version
Yes, Vignesh also pointed that. Will fix in the next version.
SR1 and SR2 will be consistent with use of AM65X and not AM65x in next
version
|
By
Yogesh Siraswar
·
#14052
·
|
|
Re: [dunfell/master][PATCH] conf: j7-evm: Replace eaik dtb with sk to KERNEL_DEVICETREE
Was there a corresponding kernel change with the file rename?
--
Regards,
Denys Dmytriyenko <denis@...>
PGP: 0x420902729A92C964 - https://denix.org/0x420902729A92C964
Fingerprint: 25FC E4A5
Was there a corresponding kernel change with the file rename?
--
Regards,
Denys Dmytriyenko <denis@...>
PGP: 0x420902729A92C964 - https://denix.org/0x420902729A92C964
Fingerprint: 25FC E4A5
|
By
Denys Dmytriyenko
·
#14051
·
|
|
Re: [EXTERNAL] [meta-ti][master/dunfell][PATCH v2] ti-linux-fw: Support common inc for all firmware
Also, "AM65x" lower case "x" here
AM65X has uppercase X here. better to be consistent.
Also, "AM65x" lower case "x" here
AM65X has uppercase X here. better to be consistent.
|
By
Denys Dmytriyenko
·
#14050
·
|
|
Re: [EXTERNAL] [meta-ti][master/dunfell][PATCH v2] ti-linux-fw: Support common inc for all firmware
Good catch. copy-paste error.
Will fix in new version.
Good catch. copy-paste error.
Will fix in new version.
|
By
Yogesh Siraswar
·
#14049
·
|
|
Re: [EXTERNAL] [meta-ti][master/dunfell][PATCH v2] ti-linux-fw: Support common inc for all firmware
[...]
Should be
PV = "${PRUETH_FW_AM65x_VERSION}"
[...]
^^^
[...]
Regards
Vignesh
[...]
Should be
PV = "${PRUETH_FW_AM65x_VERSION}"
[...]
^^^
[...]
Regards
Vignesh
|
By
Vignesh Raghavendra
·
#14048
·
|
|
[master/dunfell][PATCH] ti-linux-fw: AUTOREV support for ti-linux-fw
Adds AUTOREV support for ti-linux-fw for nightly builds.
Requires corresponding change in meta-arago branding-bleeding.inc
Signed-off-by: Yogesh Siraswar <yogeshs@...>
---
Adds AUTOREV support for ti-linux-fw for nightly builds.
Requires corresponding change in meta-arago branding-bleeding.inc
Signed-off-by: Yogesh Siraswar <yogeshs@...>
---
|
By
Yogesh Siraswar
·
#14047
·
|
|
[master/dunfell][PATCH v2] ti-linux-fw: Support common inc for all firmware
Change to support common INC for all firmware
This will help with:
1) Eliminating requirement to change multiple recipes for firmware
update
2) This will help support AUTOREV
Signed-off-by: Yogesh
Change to support common INC for all firmware
This will help with:
1) Eliminating requirement to change multiple recipes for firmware
update
2) This will help support AUTOREV
Signed-off-by: Yogesh
|
By
Yogesh Siraswar
·
#14046
·
|
|
[master/dunfell][PATCH] ti-linux-fw: Support common inc for all firmware
Change to support common INC for all firmware
This will help with:
1) Eliminating requirement to change multiple recipes for firmware
update
2) This will help support AUTOREV
Signed-off-by: Yogesh
Change to support common INC for all firmware
This will help with:
1) Eliminating requirement to change multiple recipes for firmware
update
2) This will help support AUTOREV
Signed-off-by: Yogesh
|
By
Yogesh Siraswar
·
#14045
·
|
|
[dunfell/master][PATCH] conf: j7-evm: Replace eaik dtb with sk to KERNEL_DEVICETREE
From: Sinthu Raja <sinthu.raja@...>
The board name for J721E EdgeAI Kit (EAIK) is changed to J721E SK [1],
so replace the eaik dtb with sk dtb file
[1]
From: Sinthu Raja <sinthu.raja@...>
The board name for J721E EdgeAI Kit (EAIK) is changed to J721E SK [1],
so replace the eaik dtb with sk dtb file
[1]
|
By
Sinthu Raja M
·
#14044
·
|
|
[PATCH dunfell/master 0/2] ICSSG PRUETH firmware update for 8.1
First patch updates DUAL EMAC firmware to 02.02.09.06 release bringing
in TSN features
Second patch adds new recipe to patch ICSSG switch firmwares, which are
new in 8.1
Vignesh Raghavedra (2):
First patch updates DUAL EMAC firmware to 02.02.09.06 release bringing
in TSN features
Second patch adds new recipe to patch ICSSG switch firmwares, which are
new in 8.1
Vignesh Raghavedra (2):
|
By
Vignesh Raghavendra
·
#14043
·
|