|
Re: [dunfell][PATCH v2] ti-graphics: gpu enable and move all platforms to ddk 1.15
PVR or PowerVR name is still used as an overall umbrella for all of
Imagination's graphics, vision and AI chips, including SGX and Rogue/RGX:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PowerVR
1. I totally
PVR or PowerVR name is still used as an overall umbrella for all of
Imagination's graphics, vision and AI chips, including SGX and Rogue/RGX:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PowerVR
1. I totally
|
By
Denys Dmytriyenko
·
#14559
·
|
|
Re: [dunfell][PATCH v2] ti-graphics: gpu enable and move all platforms to ddk 1.15
PVR_SOC is a bit of a legacy name, especially since PVR is now IMG.
Thinking on this, the mapping between SoC family and the internal names
like "RGX_BVNC" and "TARGET_PRODUCT" are specific to the
PVR_SOC is a bit of a legacy name, especially since PVR is now IMG.
Thinking on this, the mapping between SoC family and the internal names
like "RGX_BVNC" and "TARGET_PRODUCT" are specific to the
|
By
Andrew Davis
·
#14558
·
|
|
[dunfell][PATCH v4] machine: Add am62xx evm configuration
From: Nishanth Menon <nm@...>
Lets add the basic AM62xx-evm configuration.
- Add configurations.
- Add firmware overrides.
- Add u-boot overrides.
Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon
From: Nishanth Menon <nm@...>
Lets add the basic AM62xx-evm configuration.
- Add configurations.
- Add firmware overrides.
- Add u-boot overrides.
Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon
|
By
Ryan Eatmon
·
#14557
·
|
|
Re: [dunfell][PATCH v3] machine: Add am62xx evm configuration
I'll remove those errant tabs in v4.
The formatting has been in there for quite a while, so a more general file clean up might be in order. I'll save that for another commit after we get past all of
I'll remove those errant tabs in v4.
The formatting has been in there for quite a while, so a more general file clean up might be in order. I'll save that for another commit after we get past all of
|
By
Ryan Eatmon
·
#14556
·
|
|
Re: [dunfell][PATCH v3] machine: Add am62xx evm configuration
Some quotes from the manual for 3 different cases - shell code, python code
and multi-line statements:
===============================================
Indentation: Use spaces for indentation rather
Some quotes from the manual for 3 different cases - shell code, python code
and multi-line statements:
===============================================
Indentation: Use spaces for indentation rather
|
By
Denys Dmytriyenko
·
#14555
·
|
|
Re: [dunfell][PATCH v2] ti-graphics: gpu enable and move all platforms to ddk 1.15
Overall looks good, please see inline below.
I was actually thinking of keeping PVR_SOC variable and moving it to
corresponding machine configs.
E.g. instead of these 3 overrides in the recipe,
Overall looks good, please see inline below.
I was actually thinking of keeping PVR_SOC variable and moving it to
corresponding machine configs.
E.g. instead of these 3 overrides in the recipe,
|
By
Denys Dmytriyenko
·
#14554
·
|
|
Re: [master][PATCH 1/4] meta-ti: rename j7-evm to j721e-evm
There are also some external docs on this that need updated but I can take a lead on that.
Thanks, that would be good, I have to admit my setup is not all the way back together yet so my testing
There are also some external docs on this that need updated but I can take a lead on that.
Thanks, that would be good, I have to admit my setup is not all the way back together yet so my testing
|
By
Andrew Davis
·
#14553
·
|
|
Re: [master][PATCH 1/4] meta-ti: rename j7-evm to j721e-evm
Heh, I was actually thinking of finally making such change myself lately! :)
My main concern was about breaking downstream users of meta-ti who builds on
top of j7-evm platform. But it is probably a
Heh, I was actually thinking of finally making such change myself lately! :)
My main concern was about breaking downstream users of meta-ti who builds on
top of j7-evm platform. But it is probably a
|
By
Denys Dmytriyenko
·
#14552
·
|
|
[master][PATCH 3/4] ti-img-rogue-umlibs: only the j721e SoC is currently supported
There are now three SoCs in the J7 family, but only the j721e variant
is currently supported. Be specific here.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Davis <afd@...>
---
There are now three SoCs in the J7 family, but only the j721e variant
is currently supported. Be specific here.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Davis <afd@...>
---
|
By
Andrew Davis
·
#14551
·
|
|
[master][PATCH 4/4] ti-sgx-ddk-um: only the am65xx member of the k3 family is supported
The AM65xx is the only member of the K3 family with an SGX GPU.
Be specific here to avoid confusion.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Davis <afd@...>
---
The AM65xx is the only member of the K3 family with an SGX GPU.
Be specific here to avoid confusion.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Davis <afd@...>
---
|
By
Andrew Davis
·
#14550
·
|
|
[master][PATCH 1/4] meta-ti: rename j7-evm to j721e-evm
In many places we use "j7" the family when we should be using a
specific SoC or EVM and vice-versa. For instance when including
graphics drivers we add for all "j7" family, but what we really
want is
In many places we use "j7" the family when we should be using a
specific SoC or EVM and vice-versa. For instance when including
graphics drivers we add for all "j7" family, but what we really
want is
|
By
Andrew Davis
·
#14549
·
|
|
[master][PATCH 2/4] meta-ti-bsp: add SoC families for the J7 SoCs
This allows us to be more specific around what SoCs we support and
lets us add features based on the SoC family not just at the EVM or
whole J7family level.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Davis
This allows us to be more specific around what SoCs we support and
lets us add features based on the SoC family not just at the EVM or
whole J7family level.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Davis
|
By
Andrew Davis
·
#14548
·
|
|
Re: [dunfell][PATCH v3] machine: Add am62xx evm configuration
^^ Looks like some tabs found there way in here..
Why do we have these indented so far anyway, this whole file has wacky
indenting, needs normalized.
Andrew
^^ Looks like some tabs found there way in here..
Why do we have these indented so far anyway, this whole file has wacky
indenting, needs normalized.
Andrew
|
By
Andrew Davis
·
#14547
·
|
|
[dunfell][PATCH v3] machine: Add am62xx evm configuration
From: Nishanth Menon <nm@...>
Lets add the basic AM62xx-evm configuration.
Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@...>
Signed-off-by: Hari Nagalla <hnagalla@...>
Signed-off-by: Ryan Eatmon
From: Nishanth Menon <nm@...>
Lets add the basic AM62xx-evm configuration.
Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@...>
Signed-off-by: Hari Nagalla <hnagalla@...>
Signed-off-by: Ryan Eatmon
|
By
Ryan Eatmon
·
#14546
·
|
|
[dunfell][PATCH v2] ti-graphics: gpu enable and move all platforms to ddk 1.15
Enable the GPU for am62xx and j721s2 and use IMG DDK 1.15
Migrate Imagination DDK 1.13 to DDK 1.15 for J721e
Signed-off-by: Darren Etheridge <detheridge@...>
---
No changes in the content of the
Enable the GPU for am62xx and j721s2 and use IMG DDK 1.15
Migrate Imagination DDK 1.13 to DDK 1.15 for J721e
Signed-off-by: Darren Etheridge <detheridge@...>
---
No changes in the content of the
|
By
Etheridge, Darren
·
#14545
·
|
|
Re: [dunfell][PATCH] ti-graphics: gpu enable and move all platforms to ddk 1.15
Please lower the similarity threshold to produce a diff of this recipe for
review, instead of separate remove/add.
--
Regards,
Denys Dmytriyenko <denis@...>
PGP: 0x420902729A92C964 -
Please lower the similarity threshold to produce a diff of this recipe for
review, instead of separate remove/add.
--
Regards,
Denys Dmytriyenko <denis@...>
PGP: 0x420902729A92C964 -
|
By
Denys Dmytriyenko
·
#14544
·
|
|
Re: [dunfell][PATCH v2 7/7] ti-rtos: Fix AM62x Fix MCU core numbers
Fixes like this should probably be squashed.
--
Regards,
Denys Dmytriyenko <denis@...>
PGP: 0x420902729A92C964 - https://denix.org/0x420902729A92C964
Fingerprint: 25FC E4A5 8A72 2F69 1186
Fixes like this should probably be squashed.
--
Regards,
Denys Dmytriyenko <denis@...>
PGP: 0x420902729A92C964 - https://denix.org/0x420902729A92C964
Fingerprint: 25FC E4A5 8A72 2F69 1186
|
By
Denys Dmytriyenko
·
#14543
·
|
|
Re: [dunfell][PATCH v2 5/7] ti-rtos: Add support for AM62x M4F
Ah, I see it's being fixed later here (in patch #5)...
I know this patch series has been developed internally over time and comes
with a history. I wonder if this needs cleaning up during
Ah, I see it's being fixed later here (in patch #5)...
I know this patch series has been developed internally over time and comes
with a history. I wonder if this needs cleaning up during
|
By
Denys Dmytriyenko
·
#14542
·
|
|
Re: [dunfell][PATCH 00/11] Adding support for am62xx
NAK to the series.
a) patches need to be cleaned up - squashed etc.
b) lpm-demo binary should probably belong to meta-arago instead
of meta-ti. meta-ti should be a bsp layer, not a distro.
--
NAK to the series.
a) patches need to be cleaned up - squashed etc.
b) lpm-demo binary should probably belong to meta-arago instead
of meta-ti. meta-ti should be a bsp layer, not a distro.
--
|
By
Nishanth Menon
·
#14541
·
|
|
Re: [dunfell][PATCH 04/11] HACK: recipes-ti: ti-rtos-metadata: Make am62x point to am64x
NAK -> I know I authored these initial patches during silicon bringup,
but please do squash and cleanup the patches prior to posting
upstream.
--
Regards,
Nishanth Menon
Key (0xDDB5849D1736249D) /
NAK -> I know I authored these initial patches during silicon bringup,
but please do squash and cleanup the patches prior to posting
upstream.
--
Regards,
Nishanth Menon
Key (0xDDB5849D1736249D) /
|
By
Nishanth Menon
·
#14540
·
|