|
[dunfell/master][PATCH v2] ti-rtos-firmware: Add soft link to the rtos firmware binaries
Changes for firmware update( eff643e5 ti-rtos-firmware: update the
source to ti-linux-firmware) were in-complete without soft link.
1) Added soft link missing for the rtos firmware.
2) Updated the IPC
Changes for firmware update( eff643e5 ti-rtos-firmware: update the
source to ti-linux-firmware) were in-complete without soft link.
1) Added soft link missing for the rtos firmware.
2) Updated the IPC
|
By
Yogesh Siraswar
·
#13932
·
|
|
Re: [dunfell/master][PATCH] ti-rtos-firmware: Add soft link to the rtos firmware binaries
Yes, this is temporary work-around for 8.0.We plan to clean this for 8.1.
The name used are as per the IPC tests in LTP-DDT.
Will fix in V2.
Yes, missed it. Will fix in v2.
Yes, this is temporary work-around for 8.0.We plan to clean this for 8.1.
The name used are as per the IPC tests in LTP-DDT.
Will fix in V2.
Yes, missed it. Will fix in v2.
|
By
Yogesh Siraswar
·
#13931
·
|
|
Re: [dunfell/master][PATCH] ti-rtos-firmware: Add soft link to the rtos firmware binaries
Hi Yogesh,
I am guessing you will be moving away from overloading this recipe for next
release, and will do this cleanly.
Hmm, I am actually not sure if these are actually baremetal firmwares.
Hi Yogesh,
I am guessing you will be moving away from overloading this recipe for next
release, and will do this cleanly.
Hmm, I am actually not sure if these are actually baremetal firmwares.
|
By
Suman Anna
·
#13930
·
|
|
[dunfell/master][PATCH] ti-rtos-firmware: Add soft link to the rtos firmware binaries
Changes for firmware update( eff643e5 ti-rtos-firmware: update the
source to ti-linux-firmware) were in-complete without soft link.
1) Added soft link missing for the rtos firmware.
2) Updated the IPC
Changes for firmware update( eff643e5 ti-rtos-firmware: update the
source to ti-linux-firmware) were in-complete without soft link.
1) Added soft link missing for the rtos firmware.
2) Updated the IPC
|
By
Yogesh Siraswar
·
#13929
·
|
|
[dunfell/master][PATCH 0/4] core-sdk 08.00.00.003 release update
Changes to fix the release version for 08.00.00.003
Yogesh Siraswar (4):
u-boot-ti-staging: Update the u-boot srcrev to 08.00.00.003
linux-ti-staging: Update the linux srcrev to 08.00.00.003
Changes to fix the release version for 08.00.00.003
Yogesh Siraswar (4):
u-boot-ti-staging: Update the u-boot srcrev to 08.00.00.003
linux-ti-staging: Update the linux srcrev to 08.00.00.003
|
By
Yogesh Siraswar
·
#13928
·
|
|
[dunfell/master][PATCH 3/4] linux-ti-staging-rt: Update linux-rt srcrev to 08.00.00.003
Updated the linux-rt to pick 08.00.00.003 tag
Signed-off-by: Yogesh Siraswar <yogeshs@...>
---
recipes-kernel/linux/linux-ti-staging-rt_5.10.bb | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1
Updated the linux-rt to pick 08.00.00.003 tag
Signed-off-by: Yogesh Siraswar <yogeshs@...>
---
recipes-kernel/linux/linux-ti-staging-rt_5.10.bb | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1
|
By
Yogesh Siraswar
·
#13927
·
|
|
[dunfell/master][PATCH 4/4] ti-sci-fw: Update ti-linux-firmware srcrev to 08.00.00.003
Update ti-linux-firmware to pick 08.00.00.003
Signed-off-by: Yogesh Siraswar <yogeshs@...>
---
recipes-bsp/ti-sci-fw/ti-sci-fw.inc | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff
Update ti-linux-firmware to pick 08.00.00.003
Signed-off-by: Yogesh Siraswar <yogeshs@...>
---
recipes-bsp/ti-sci-fw/ti-sci-fw.inc | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff
|
By
Yogesh Siraswar
·
#13926
·
|
|
[dunfell/master][PATCH 1/4] u-boot-ti-staging: Update the u-boot srcrev to 08.00.00.003
Update the u-boot to pick tag 08.00.00.003
Signed-off-by: Yogesh Siraswar <yogeshs@...>
---
recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-ti-staging_2021.01.bb | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2
Update the u-boot to pick tag 08.00.00.003
Signed-off-by: Yogesh Siraswar <yogeshs@...>
---
recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-ti-staging_2021.01.bb | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2
|
By
Yogesh Siraswar
·
#13925
·
|
|
[dunfell/master][PATCH 2/4] linux-ti-staging: Update the linux srcrev to 08.00.00.003
Updated the linux branch to pick 08.00.00.003 tag
Signed-off-by: Yogesh Siraswar <yogeshs@...>
---
recipes-kernel/linux/linux-ti-staging_5.10.bb | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1
Updated the linux branch to pick 08.00.00.003 tag
Signed-off-by: Yogesh Siraswar <yogeshs@...>
---
recipes-kernel/linux/linux-ti-staging_5.10.bb | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1
|
By
Yogesh Siraswar
·
#13924
·
|
|
[dunfell/master][PATCH v2] ti-rtos-firmware: update the source to ti-linux-firmware
This is temporary change to pick the 08.00.00.026 firmware from
ti-linux-firmware repos:
1) Using the ti-sci-fw to pick the latest firmware and support AUTOREV
in future
2) Kept the destination folder
This is temporary change to pick the 08.00.00.026 firmware from
ti-linux-firmware repos:
1) Using the ti-sci-fw to pick the latest firmware and support AUTOREV
in future
2) Kept the destination folder
|
By
Yogesh Siraswar
·
#13923
·
|
|
Re: [EXTERNAL] [meta-ti][dunfell/master][PATCH] ti-rtos-firmware: update the source to ti-linux-firmware
The SRCREV for the ti-sci-fw.inc will be updated to head after tagging. Need to fix the PV to override from the ti-sci-fw. Will submit new patch revision.
TODO: Will need to split ti-eth and ti-ipc
The SRCREV for the ti-sci-fw.inc will be updated to head after tagging. Need to fix the PV to override from the ti-sci-fw. Will submit new patch revision.
TODO: Will need to split ti-eth and ti-ipc
|
By
Yogesh Siraswar
·
#13922
·
|
|
[meta-ti PATCH] prueth-fw-am65x-sr2: Update firmware to 02.02.09.03
From: Vignesh Raghavedra <vigneshr@...>
Update AM65x SR2.0 prueth firmware to 02.02.09.03 that adds support for
100M HD mode.
Signed-off-by: Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...>
---
From: Vignesh Raghavedra <vigneshr@...>
Update AM65x SR2.0 prueth firmware to 02.02.09.03 that adds support for
100M HD mode.
Signed-off-by: Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...>
---
|
By
Vignesh Raghavendra
·
#13921
·
|
|
Re: [EXTERNAL] [meta-ti][dunfell/master][PATCH] ti-rtos-firmware: update the source to ti-linux-firmware
ti-eth is @ 08.00.00.029 -> how is that taken care of?
I thought we did not do AUTOREV on master branch in order for builds to
be reproducible?
Regards
Vignesh
ti-eth is @ 08.00.00.029 -> how is that taken care of?
I thought we did not do AUTOREV on master branch in order for builds to
be reproducible?
Regards
Vignesh
|
By
Vignesh Raghavendra
·
#13920
·
|
|
[dunfell/master][PATCH] ti-rtos-firmware: update the source to ti-linux-firmware
This is temporary change to pick the 08.00.00.026 firmware from
ti-linux-firmware repos:
1) Using the ti-sci-fw to pick the latest firmware and support AUTOREV
2) Kept the destination folder name same
This is temporary change to pick the 08.00.00.026 firmware from
ti-linux-firmware repos:
1) Using the ti-sci-fw to pick the latest firmware and support AUTOREV
2) Kept the destination folder name same
|
By
Yogesh Siraswar
·
#13919
·
|
|
[master][PATCH] ti-img-rogue-driver: unify with dunfell and fix double-patching
From: Denys Dmytriyenko <denys@...>
There was a discrepancy between master and dunfell where 2 different versions
of the same patch existed, so when syncing branches, it resulted in
From: Denys Dmytriyenko <denys@...>
There was a discrepancy between master and dunfell where 2 different versions
of the same patch existed, so when syncing branches, it resulted in
|
By
Denys Dmytriyenko
·
#13918
·
|
|
Re: [EXTERNAL] [meta-ti] Merge confict chunk
Denys,
This patch was marked for both master and dunfell. The patch file name were different so missed on the changes. My bad. I guess, we need to back-port master patch to dunfell instead of creating
Denys,
This patch was marked for both master and dunfell. The patch file name were different so missed on the changes. My bad. I guess, we need to back-port master patch to dunfell instead of creating
|
By
Yogesh Siraswar
·
#13917
·
|
|
Re: [EXTERNAL] [meta-ti] Merge confict chunk
Yogesh,
You should not rebase master or release branches like dunfell.
It appears master already had a similar patch from March, which was never
merged to dunfell. So master now tries to patch it
Yogesh,
You should not rebase master or release branches like dunfell.
It appears master already had a similar patch from March, which was never
merged to dunfell. So master now tries to patch it
|
By
Denys Dmytriyenko
·
#13916
·
|
|
Re: [EXTERNAL] [meta-ti] Merge confict chunk
Hi Raj,
Thanks for pointing it out. Have fixed the same. Will try to be more careful in future.
Thanks
Yogesh
more
Hi Raj,
Thanks for pointing it out. Have fixed the same. Will try to be more careful in future.
Thanks
Yogesh
more
|
By
Yogesh Siraswar
·
#13915
·
|
|
Merge confict chunk
Hi Denys
This commit
https://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/meta-ti/commit/?id=4c1d26f6282b9959b9ee10aa77b3e05ed56299fb
has a merge anchor thats committed perhaps accidentally.
Thanks
-Khem
Hi Denys
This commit
https://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/meta-ti/commit/?id=4c1d26f6282b9959b9ee10aa77b3e05ed56299fb
has a merge anchor thats committed perhaps accidentally.
Thanks
-Khem
|
By
Khem Raj
·
#13914
·
|
|
Re: [dunfell/master PATCH V2] conf: j7-evm: Add j721e eaik dtb to KERNEL_DEVICETREE
Hi Yogesh,
Any update on this?. Can we merge this patch if the u-boot and linux
recipes are updated.
Regards
Sinthu Raja
Hi Yogesh,
Any update on this?. Can we merge this patch if the u-boot and linux
recipes are updated.
Regards
Sinthu Raja
|
By
Sinthu Raja M
·
#13913
·
|