Can i move it to conf/machine/include/am64xx.inc instead ? please advise. Will submit v4 accordingly >

Probably better to set TFA_BOARD = "lite" in the corresponding am64xx-evm.conf machine config... -- Denys

From: Praneeth Bajjuri <praneeth@...> Update SRCREV to pick latest that includes AM64X support commit 65dd16b4e ("ti: k3: Introduce lite device board support") adds support of AM64X platform in

Praneeth Thanks.  Now if we can just get that in the commit message except for the URL target Dan

Thats the new target name for AM64 Ref: https://git.ti.com/cgit/atf/arm-trusted-firmware/commit/?h=ti-atf&id=65dd16b4ea5032752af62e94ca64cff41733a123 TARGET_BOARD=lite for

Praneeth You are doing just a bit more then this.  What is the "lite" for now? Dan

From: Praneeth Bajjuri <praneeth@...> Update SRCREV to pick latest that includes AM64 support Signed-off-by: Praneeth Bajjuri <praneeth@...> ---

Signed-off-by: Dan Murphy <dmurphy@...> --- conf/machine/include/am64xx.inc | 9 +++------ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/conf/machine/include/am64xx.inc

Signed-off-by: Dan Murphy <dmurphy@...> --- recipes-kernel/linux/linux-ti-staging-rt_5.4.bb | 4 ++-- recipes-kernel/linux/linux-ti-staging_5.4.bb | 4 ++-- 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4

Signed-off-by: Dan Murphy <dmurphy@...> --- recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-ti.inc | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-ti.inc

Signed-off-by: Dan Murphy <dmurphy@...> --- recipes-ti/ti-rtos-bin/ti-rtos-firmware.bb | 19 +++++++++++-------- recipes-ti/ti-rtos-bin/ti-rtos-metadata.bb | 2 +- 2 files changed, 12

Hello Is this something that needs to be added to the recipe.  To be honest I have not yet reviewed the ATF patches to know Dan

Hi Praneeth, This by itself will not be enough for AM64, but that can be an add-on patch. Need to account for TARGET_BOARD=lite for AM64x. regards Suman

From: Praneeth Bajjuri <praneeth@...> Update SRCREV to pick latest that includes AM64 support Signed-off-by: Praneeth Bajjuri <praneeth@...> ---

Suman OK I will send another patch to update the SHA and rev Dan

I believe this should be am64x, atleast thats the name used in the metadata.inc files. Did you submit the wrong patch? I see this as /am64x on the -next branch, which is correct. regards Suman

Why do we need this? I don't see any for AM65xx. regards Suman

You can probably merge this patch first in preparation. Also, the SHA is already stale, might just pick the latest, even 5.4.82.. regards Suman

Hi Dan, Guess you are going to wait until ti-sci-fw recipe is updated. Alternatively, name this correctly, and do not include the ti-sci-fw recipe for now for AM64xx. This should be ready the next