Hi Hari,

On 10/26/21 8:00 PM, Hari Nagalla via lists.yoctoproject.org wrote:

AM46x SoCs have a Cortex-M4F core in MCU domain. This core is used a

%s/AM46x/AM64x/

Also, no need to add v1 for the first versions, you only need it on subsequent
revisions.

standalone device for safety applications. For non safety applications,
the device is exposed as a remote processor with Linux rpmsg framework.

Signed-off-by: Hari Nagalla <hnagalla@...>
---
recipes-ti/ti-rtos-bin/ti-rtos-firmware.bb | 5 +++++
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)

diff --git a/recipes-ti/ti-rtos-bin/ti-rtos-firmware.bb b/recipes-ti/ti-rtos-bin/ti-rtos-firmware.bb
index 43de1ec2..adc218f1 100644
--- a/recipes-ti/ti-rtos-bin/ti-rtos-firmware.bb
+++ b/recipes-ti/ti-rtos-bin/ti-rtos-firmware.bb
@@ -62,6 +62,7 @@ do_install_prepend_am64xx() {
mv am64-main-r5f0_1-fw ipc_echo_baremetal_test_mcu1_1_release_strip.xer5f; \
mv am64-main-r5f1_0-fw ipc_echo_baremetal_test_mcu2_0_release_strip.xer5f; \
mv am64-main-r5f1_1-fw ipc_echo_baremetal_test_mcu2_1_release_strip.xer5f; \
+ mv am64-mcu-m4f0_0-fw ipc_echo_baremetal_test_mcu3_0_release_strip.xer5f; \
)
}

@@ -124,6 +125,7 @@ ALTERNATIVE_${PN}_am64xx = "\
am64-main-r5f0_1-fw \
am64-main-r5f1_0-fw \
am64-main-r5f1_1-fw \
+ am64-mcu-m4f0_0-fw \
"

ALTERNATIVE_${PN}_j7 = "\
@@ -154,6 +156,7 @@ TARGET_MAIN_R5FSS0_0_am64xx = "am64-main-r5f0_0-fw"
TARGET_MAIN_R5FSS0_1_am64xx = "am64-main-r5f0_1-fw"
TARGET_MAIN_R5FSS1_0_am64xx = "am64-main-r5f1_0-fw"
TARGET_MAIN_R5FSS1_1_am64xx = "am64-main-r5f1_1-fw"
+TARGET_MCU_R4FSS0_0_am64xx = "am64-mcu-m4f0_0-fw"

%s/R4FSS0/M4FSS0/

TARGET_MCU_R5FSS0_0_j7 = "j7-mcu-r5f0_0-fw"
TARGET_MCU_R5FSS0_1_j7 = "j7-mcu-r5f0_1-fw"
@@ -177,6 +180,7 @@ ALTERNATIVE_LINK_NAME[am64-main-r5f0_0-fw] = "${base_libdir}/firmware/${TARGET_M
ALTERNATIVE_LINK_NAME[am64-main-r5f0_1-fw] = "${base_libdir}/firmware/${TARGET_MAIN_R5FSS0_1}"
ALTERNATIVE_LINK_NAME[am64-main-r5f1_0-fw] = "${base_libdir}/firmware/${TARGET_MAIN_R5FSS1_0}"
ALTERNATIVE_LINK_NAME[am64-main-r5f1_1-fw] = "${base_libdir}/firmware/${TARGET_MAIN_R5FSS1_1}"
+ALTERNATIVE_LINK_NAME[am64-mcu-m4f0_0-fw] = "${base_libdir}/firmware/${TARGET_MCU_M4FSS0_0}"

ou have the variable name correct here. Makes me wonder if this patch is even
tested.

regards
Suman

ALTERNATIVE_LINK_NAME[j7-mcu-r5f0_0-fw] = "${base_libdir}/firmware/${TARGET_MCU_R5FSS0_0}"
ALTERNATIVE_LINK_NAME[j7-mcu-r5f0_1-fw] = "${base_libdir}/firmware/${TARGET_MCU_R5FSS0_1}"
@@ -202,6 +206,7 @@ ALTERNATIVE_TARGET[am64-main-r5f0_0-fw] = "${base_libdir}/firmware/pdk-ipc/ipc_e
ALTERNATIVE_TARGET[am64-main-r5f0_1-fw] = "${base_libdir}/firmware/pdk-ipc/ipc_echo_baremetal_test_mcu1_1_release_strip.xer5f"
ALTERNATIVE_TARGET[am64-main-r5f1_0-fw] = "${base_libdir}/firmware/pdk-ipc/ipc_echo_baremetal_test_mcu2_0_release_strip.xer5f"
ALTERNATIVE_TARGET[am64-main-r5f1_1-fw] = "${base_libdir}/firmware/pdk-ipc/ipc_echo_baremetal_test_mcu2_1_release_strip.xer5f"
+ALTERNATIVE_TARGET[am64-mcu-m4f0_0-fw] = "${base_libdir}/firmware/pdk-ipc/ipc_echo_baremetal_test_mcu3_0_release_strip.xer5f"

ALTERNATIVE_TARGET[j7-mcu-r5f0_0-fw] = "${base_libdir}/firmware/pdk-ipc/ipc_echo_testb_mcu1_0_release_strip.xer5f"
ALTERNATIVE_TARGET[j7-mcu-r5f0_1-fw] = "${base_libdir}/firmware/pdk-ipc/ipc_echo_test_mcu1_1_release_strip.xer5f"