On 12/11/20 7:32 AM, Dan Murphy via lists.yoctoproject.org wrote:

Signed-off-by: Dan Murphy <dmurphy@...>
---
recipes-ti/ti-rtos-bin/ti-rtos-firmware.bb | 6 ++++++
recipes-ti/ti-rtos-bin/ti-rtos-metadata.bb | 3 ++-
2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/recipes-ti/ti-rtos-bin/ti-rtos-firmware.bb b/recipes-ti/ti-rtos-bin/ti-rtos-firmware.bb
index 01cf0fc91aa6..74aac2c9fa0d 100644
--- a/recipes-ti/ti-rtos-bin/ti-rtos-firmware.bb
+++ b/recipes-ti/ti-rtos-bin/ti-rtos-firmware.bb
@@ -20,14 +20,19 @@ DEFAULT_RTOS_FAMILY = "jacinto"
DEFAULT_RTOS_VERSION = "07_01_00_38"
DEFAULT_RTOS_VERSION_DOT = "07.01.00.38"

+DEFAULT_RTOS_VERSION_am64xx = "07_01_03_01"
+DEFAULT_RTOS_VERSION_DOT_am64xx = "07.01.03.01"
+
DEFAULT_RTOS_SOC = "undefined"
DEFAULT_RTOS_SOC_j7 = "j721e"
DEFAULT_RTOS_SOC_j7200-evm = "j7200"
DEFAULT_RTOS_SOC_am65xx = "am65xx"
+DEFAULT_RTOS_SOC_am64xx = "am64xx"

I believe this should be am64x, atleast thats the name used in the metadata.inc
files.

DEFAULT_RTOS_WEBLINK = "undefined"
DEFAULT_RTOS_WEBLINK_j7 = "https://software-dl.ti.com/jacinto7/esd/processor-sdk-rtos-jacinto7/firmware/${CORESDK_RTOS_VERSION}"
DEFAULT_RTOS_WEBLINK_am65xx = "https://software-dl.ti.com/processor-sdk-rtos/esd/AM65X/firmware/${CORESDK_RTOS_VERSION}"
+DEFAULT_RTOS_WEBLINK_am64xx = "https://software-dl.ti.com/processor-sdk-rtos/esd/AM64X/firmware/${CORESDK_RTOS_VERSION}"

DEFAULT_FIRMWARE_FILE = "coresdk_rtos_${CORESDK_RTOS_SOC}_${CORESDK_RTOS_VERSION}_firmware.tar.xz"

@@ -38,6 +43,7 @@ DEFAULT_FIRMWARE_SHA256SUM = "unknown"
DEFAULT_FIRMWARE_SHA256SUM_j7 = "93e4d3742a922015f3295f5c20ef4bc2b9751139ffcd5620b8df7047bff50651"
DEFAULT_FIRMWARE_SHA256SUM_j7200-evm = "cd5071a8f6ddaec05346e4c2bbeed6dc7bcb376d6edc47f81b9aeaf38f151176"
DEFAULT_FIRMWARE_SHA256SUM_am65xx = "e54cc8da7fefa1ebf55454b184b42c364de3eebb34a328d244b8275b7763eb58"
+DEFAULT_FIRMWARE_SHA256SUM_am64xx = "dc1a39b7a7f403235364a84ed5291666a84a5fa7fe8c136ec07d45848c1017f4"

# Use weak assignment for CORESDK_RTOS_* variables to use defaults if not yet set
CORESDK_RTOS_FAMILY ?= "${DEFAULT_RTOS_FAMILY}"
diff --git a/recipes-ti/ti-rtos-bin/ti-rtos-metadata.bb b/recipes-ti/ti-rtos-bin/ti-rtos-metadata.bb
index 15c0c68cc2d8..21e7b1dc71c2 100644
--- a/recipes-ti/ti-rtos-bin/ti-rtos-metadata.bb
+++ b/recipes-ti/ti-rtos-bin/ti-rtos-metadata.bb
@@ -13,11 +13,12 @@ PLAT_SFX = ""
PLAT_SFX_j7 = "/j721e"
PLAT_SFX_j7200-evm = "/j7200"
PLAT_SFX_am65xx = "/am65xx"
+PLAT_SFX_am64xx = "/am64xx"

Did you submit the wrong patch? I see this as /am64x on the -next branch, which
is correct.

regards
Suman

# Use weak assignment to set defaults to TI_RTOS_METADATA_* variables
TI_RTOS_METADATA_URI ?= "git://git.ti.com/processor-sdk/coresdk_rtos_releases.git"
TI_RTOS_METADATA_PROTOCOL ?= "git"
-TI_RTOS_METADATA_SRCREV ?= "6b63577eec787cde277d3d12b23ea80578b6ad91"
+TI_RTOS_METADATA_SRCREV ?= "d946278e9a40632d05cd1e953f5f200011be69a9"
TI_RTOS_METADATA_BRANCH ?= "master"
TI_RTOS_METADATA_DIR ?= "${PLAT_SFX}"
TI_RTOS_METADATA_FILE ?= "${S}${TI_RTOS_METADATA_DIR}/metadata.inc"