meta-freescale@lists.yoctoproject.org | imx8qxp-mek-dom0.dtb - No rule to make target 'arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8qxp-mek-dom0.dtb'

Home Messages Hashtags Subgroups

Date Date 1 - 4 of 4

imx8qxp-mek-dom0.dtb - No rule to make target 'arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8qxp-mek-dom0.dtb'

#meta-freescale #imx8qxp

Peter #24884 Hi We are creating a BSP for our i.MX 8X (i.MX 8QuadXPlus) based product. To start, we are trying to build an existing BSP as a point of reference. Have followed the instructions here: https://github.com/Freescale/fsl-community-bsp-platform But am getting: \| make[1]: * No rule to make target 'arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8qxp-mek-dom0.dtb'. Stop. \| make: * [/workdir/fsl-community-bsp/build/tmp/work-shared/imx8qxp-mek/kernel-source/Makefile:1425: freescale/imx8qxp-mek-dom0.dtb] Error 2 i.e. repo init -u https://github.com/Freescale/fsl-community-bsp-platform -b kirkstone repo sync MACHINE=imx8qxp-mek DISTRO=fslc-wayland source setup-environment build bitbake core-image-minimal bitbake -e \| grep PREFERRED_PROVIDER_virtual/kernel gives PREFERRED_PROVIDER_virtual/kernel="linux-fslc-imx" changing local.conf to PREFERRED_PROVIDER_virtual/kernel="linux-imx" (and deleting tmp) produces the same error Am I doing something wrong, or is this a bug? Which combination of MACHINE, DISTRO, image, provider is a known working starting point for i.MX 8X (i.MX 8QuadXPlus) please? Thank you -- Peter
More All Messages By This Member
Otavio Salvador #24885 Em qua., 9 de nov. de 2022 às 11:59, Peter via lists.yoctoproject.org <poberauer=yahoo.co.uk@...> escreveu: We are creating a BSP for our i.MX 8X (i.MX 8QuadXPlus) based product. To start, we are trying to build an existing BSP as a point of reference. Have followed the instructions here: https://github.com/Freescale/fsl-community-bsp-platform But am getting: \| make[1]: * No rule to make target 'arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8qxp-mek-dom0.dtb'. Stop. \| make: * [/workdir/fsl-community-bsp/build/tmp/work-shared/imx8qxp-mek/kernel-source/Makefile:1425: freescale/imx8qxp-mek-dom0.dtb] Error 2 i.e. repo init -u https://github.com/Freescale/fsl-community-bsp-platform -b kirkstone repo sync MACHINE=imx8qxp-mek DISTRO=fslc-wayland source setup-environment build bitbake core-image-minimal bitbake -e \| grep PREFERRED_PROVIDER_virtual/kernel gives PREFERRED_PROVIDER_virtual/kernel="linux-fslc-imx" changing local.conf to PREFERRED_PROVIDER_virtual/kernel="linux-imx" (and deleting tmp) produces the same error Am I doing something wrong, or is this a bug? Which combination of MACHINE, DISTRO, image, provider is a known working starting point for i.MX 8X (i.MX 8QuadXPlus) please? Looks like a bug. Please open an issue on GitHub. -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems http://www.ossystems.com.br http://code.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 (53) 9 9981-7854 Mobile: +1 (347) 903-9750
More All Messages By This Member
Peter #24886 Hi Otavio Thank you, have opened: https://github.com/Freescale/meta-freescale/issues/1288
More All Messages By This Member
Andrey Zhizhikin #24887 Hello all, On Wed, Nov 9, 2022 at 4:37 PM Otavio Salvador <otavio.salvador@...> wrote: Em qua., 9 de nov. de 2022 às 11:59, Peter via lists.yoctoproject.org <poberauer=yahoo.co.uk@...> escreveu: We are creating a BSP for our i.MX 8X (i.MX 8QuadXPlus) based product. To start, we are trying to build an existing BSP as a point of reference. Have followed the instructions here: https://github.com/Freescale/fsl-community-bsp-platform But am getting: \| make[1]: * No rule to make target 'arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8qxp-mek-dom0.dtb'. Stop. \| make: * [/workdir/fsl-community-bsp/build/tmp/work-shared/imx8qxp-mek/kernel-source/Makefile:1425: freescale/imx8qxp-mek-dom0.dtb] Error 2 i.e. repo init -u https://github.com/Freescale/fsl-community-bsp-platform -b kirkstone repo sync MACHINE=imx8qxp-mek DISTRO=fslc-wayland source setup-environment build bitbake core-image-minimal bitbake -e \| grep PREFERRED_PROVIDER_virtual/kernel gives PREFERRED_PROVIDER_virtual/kernel="linux-fslc-imx" changing local.conf to PREFERRED_PROVIDER_virtual/kernel="linux-imx" (and deleting tmp) produces the same error Am I doing something wrong, or is this a bug? Which combination of MACHINE, DISTRO, image, provider is a known working starting point for i.MX 8X (i.MX 8QuadXPlus) please? Looks like a bug. Please open an issue on GitHub. Indeed it is! While machine file [1] shows that the DTB shall be available, it is not present in the Kernel source tree [2]. Guess the machine needs to be aligned with what is provided in the Kernel, as it was not touched since 2021. -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems http://www.ossystems.com.br http://code.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 (53) 9 9981-7854 Mobile: +1 (347) 903-9750 Link: [1]: https://github.com/Freescale/meta-freescale/blob/66d738d4ab1270c2e87f5afabc085bdff205e5ac/conf/machine/imx8qxp-mek.conf#L12 Link: [2]: https://github.com/Freescale/linux-fslc/tree/5.15-2.1.x-imx/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/ -- Regards, Andrey.
More All Messages By This Member

1 - 4 of 4

1

Previous Topic Next Topic

Home Hashtags Subgroups Terms