On Tue, May 8, 2018 at 5:40 AM, Zhenhua Luo <zhenhua.luo@...> wrote:

The ‘sumo’ branch has not been created for meta-freescale layer yet, may I
know what’s the plan to make the YP 2.5 branch available in this Yocto
layer?

I am still working on build failure and integrating the i.MX8 stuff so
sumo is not ready for use yet.

--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
http://www.ossystems.com.br http://code.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 (53) 9 9981-7854 Mobile: +1 (347) 903-9750

On 2018-05-08 14:23, Otavio Salvador wrote:

On Tue, May 8, 2018 at 5:40 AM, Zhenhua Luo <zhenhua.luo@...> wrote:

The ‘sumo’ branch has not been created for meta-freescale layer yet, may I
know what’s the plan to make the YP 2.5 branch available in this Yocto
layer?

I am still working on build failure and integrating the i.MX8 stuff so
sumo is not ready for use yet.

Hi Otavio,

Could you kindly provide us with a status update on this?

I noticed no build errors on a build with current head of meta-freescale master branch with head of Poky Sumo branch:

$ time bitbake core-image-minimal
Loading cache: 100% |#####################################################################################################################################################################| Time: 0:00:01
Loaded 1401 entries from dependency cache.
Parsing recipes: 100% |###################################################################################################################################################################| Time: 0:00:44
Parsing of 918 .bb files complete (335 cached, 583 parsed). 1401 targets, 122 skipped, 0 masked, 0 errors.
NOTE: Resolving any missing task queue dependencies
Build Configuration:
BB_VERSION = "1.37.0"
BUILD_SYS = "x86_64-linux"
NATIVELSBSTRING = "centos-7"
TARGET_SYS = "arm-poky-linux-gnueabi"
MACHINE = "imx6sxsabreauto"
DISTRO = "poky"
DISTRO_VERSION = "2.5"
TUNE_FEATURES = "arm armv7a vfp thumb neon callconvention-hard cortexa9"
TARGET_FPU = "hard"
meta
meta-poky
meta-yocto-bsp = "sumo:f0ec7c8b2dc1797ba22c45653a5f182b63354092"
meta-freescale = "master:eeaa4b69ca399206f9e87d5104262eadb8808235"
Initialising tasks: 100% |################################################################################################################################################################| Time: 0:00:04
NOTE: Executing SetScene Tasks
NOTE: Executing RunQueue Tasks
WARNING: shadow-4.2.1-r0 do_fetch: Failed to fetch URL http://pkg-shadow.alioth.debian.org/releases/shadow-4.2.1.tar.xz, attempting MIRRORS if available
NOTE: Tasks Summary: Attempted 2548 tasks of which 5 didn't need to be rerun and all succeeded.
Summary: There was 1 WARNING message shown.
real 148m38.023s
user 0m25.782s
sys 0m2.547s

Is currently only the i.mx8 support holding you back? In that case, I would kindly suggest creating the sumo branch right now and adding the i.mx8 support later on.

It would also give the oppertunity to merge patches like https://lists.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/meta-freescale/2018-May/022537.html to meta-freescale master to match current Poky master.

Thanks for considering,

Bas.

Hello Bas,

On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 2:58 PM, Bas Mevissen <abuse@...> wrote:

On 2018-05-08 14:23, Otavio Salvador wrote:

On Tue, May 8, 2018 at 5:40 AM, Zhenhua Luo <zhenhua.luo@...> wrote:

The ‘sumo’ branch has not been created for meta-freescale layer yet, may
I
know what’s the plan to make the YP 2.5 branch available in this Yocto
layer?

I am still working on build failure and integrating the i.MX8 stuff so
sumo is not ready for use yet.

Hi Otavio,

Could you kindly provide us with a status update on this?

I noticed no build errors on a build with current head of meta-freescale
master branch with head of Poky Sumo branch:

...

I need to fix WIC support for i.MX28 before branching it also make
sure Qt and all works.

Is currently only the i.mx8 support holding you back? In that case, I would
kindly suggest creating the sumo branch right now and adding the i.mx8
support later on.

It would also give the oppertunity to merge patches like
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/meta-freescale/2018-May/022537.html
to meta-freescale master to match current Poky master.

i.MX8 is a huge addition and once we branch sumo it is going to be too
risk to backport. I don't have a big problem in let it for next
release but it is something people must to agree uppon it.

--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
http://www.ossystems.com.br http://code.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 (53) 9 9981-7854 Mobile: +1 (347) 903-9750

On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 3:17 PM, Otavio Salvador
<otavio.salvador@...> wrote:

i.MX8 is a huge addition and once we branch sumo it is going to be too
risk to backport. I don't have a big problem in let it for next
release but it is something people must to agree uppon it.

I agree.

I think we can focus on sumo right now and think about imx8 later.

Daiane

--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
http://www.ossystems.com.br http://code.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 (53) 9 9981-7854 Mobile: +1 (347) 903-9750
--
_______________________________________________
meta-freescale mailing list
meta-freescale@...
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-freescale

On 23/05/18 20:17, Otavio Salvador wrote:

Hello Bas,
On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 2:58 PM, Bas Mevissen <abuse@...> wrote:

On 2018-05-08 14:23, Otavio Salvador wrote:

On Tue, May 8, 2018 at 5:40 AM, Zhenhua Luo <zhenhua.luo@...> wrote:

The ‘sumo’ branch has not been created for meta-freescale layer yet, may
I
know what’s the plan to make the YP 2.5 branch available in this Yocto
layer?

I am still working on build failure and integrating the i.MX8 stuff so
sumo is not ready for use yet.

Hi Otavio,

Could you kindly provide us with a status update on this?

I noticed no build errors on a build with current head of meta-freescale
master branch with head of Poky Sumo branch:

...
I need to fix WIC support for i.MX28 before branching it also make
sure Qt and all works.

Agreed, i.MX28 should work and Qt should at least function (even if not accelerated) before a sumo release can be made.

Is currently only the i.mx8 support holding you back? In that case, I would
kindly suggest creating the sumo branch right now and adding the i.mx8
support later on.

It would also give the oppertunity to merge patches like
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/meta-freescale/2018-May/022537.html
to meta-freescale master to match current Poky master.

i.MX8 is a huge addition and once we branch sumo it is going to be too
risk to backport. I don't have a big problem in let it for next
release but it is something people must to agree uppon it.

In that case, I agree that i.mx8 support should wait for the next release. Waiting from now for considerable time to release m-f sumo would make people start new developments on Rocko...

--
Bas.

On 24/05/18 00:11, Bas Mevissen wrote:

In that case, I agree that i.mx8 support should wait for the next
release. Waiting from now for considerable time to release m-f sumo
would make people start new developments on Rocko...

+1

I also would like to see sumo branched now without i.MX8 rather than in
next month with i.MX8 support.

Support for running OpenGL apps on Weston for i.MX6/Etnaviv requires
weston >= 3.0 and mesa >= 17.2 [1]. That is available on sumo but not on
rocko.


Regards
-------

[1]
https://www.pengutronix.de/en/2017-09-28-etnaviv-weston-mainline.html

Hi Otavio,

I noticed the Sumo branch is there, thanks for that. As you have seen, I already started using it to get the bugs out of it.

Maybe it is good to announce it, so people start testing with it.

Little nitpick:

diff --git a/README b/README
index 1f40864..19b1a2a 100644
--- a/README
+++ b/README
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ OpenEmbedded and/or Yocto.
This layer depends on:

URI: git://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core
-branch: master
+branch: sumo
revision: HEAD

Contributing

Regards,

Bas.

On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 6:01 PM, Bas Mevissen <abuse@...> wrote:

Hi Otavio,

I noticed the Sumo branch is there, thanks for that. As you have seen, I
already started using it to get the bugs out of it.

Maybe it is good to announce it, so people start testing with it.

We are not going to make an announcement until it is all validated and
considered ready for use.

Little nitpick:

diff --git a/README b/README
index 1f40864..19b1a2a 100644
--- a/README
+++ b/README
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ OpenEmbedded and/or Yocto.
This layer depends on:

URI: git://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core
-branch: master
+branch: sumo
revision: HEAD

Oh, good catch. Mind to prepare a patch?

--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
http://www.ossystems.com.br http://code.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 (53) 9 9981-7854 Mobile: +1 (347) 903-9750