|
[PATCH] gstreamer1.0-plugins-base: set default videosink for IMXQM/IMXQXP
Hello Ming, I'm sorry, but this not the upstream URL this patch refers to. GStreamer upstream development happens here [1], and what the patch is pointing to is (as the description suggests) NXP fork
Hello Ming, I'm sorry, but this not the upstream URL this patch refers to. GStreamer upstream development happens here [1], and what the patch is pointing to is (as the description suggests) NXP fork
|
By
Andrey Zhizhikin
· #24910
·
|
|
imx8qxp-mek-dom0.dtb - No rule to make target 'arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8qxp-mek-dom0.dtb'
#meta-freescale
#imx8qxp
Hello all, <otavio.salvador@...> wrote: Indeed it is! While machine file [1] shows that the DTB shall be available, it is not present in the Kernel source tree [2]. Guess the machine need
Hello all, <otavio.salvador@...> wrote: Indeed it is! While machine file [1] shows that the DTB shall be available, it is not present in the Kernel source tree [2]. Guess the machine need
|
By
Andrey Zhizhikin
· #24887
·
|
|
Your patch: "recipes-bsp: drop custom deploy location for TF-A binary"
Hello Patrick, I'll Cc: the meta-freescale ML here, since this a second issue of the same type reported on the TF-A changes. I guess it would be informative for the others to read it in order to avoid
Hello Patrick, I'll Cc: the meta-freescale ML here, since this a second issue of the same type reported on the TF-A changes. I guess it would be informative for the others to read it in order to avoid
|
By
Andrey Zhizhikin
· #24857
·
|
|
[meta-qoriq][RESEND PATCH 1/2] lxc: Move to dynamic-layers
Hello Sean, On Fri, Jul 8, 2022 at 10:42 PM Sean Anderson via lists.yoctoproject.org <sean.anderson=seco.com@...> wrote: If this targets `meta-freescale` layer, then perhaps best wo
Hello Sean, On Fri, Jul 8, 2022 at 10:42 PM Sean Anderson via lists.yoctoproject.org <sean.anderson=seco.com@...> wrote: If this targets `meta-freescale` layer, then perhaps best wo
|
By
Andrey Zhizhikin
· #24855
·
|
|
Comunity vs i.MX
#yocto
Hello Konstantin, <eremenok.k.by@...> wrote: AFAIK, there was no war declared, not at least that I was aware of when I started using Yocto Project and `meta-freescale` layer. ;-) NXP is lacking
Hello Konstantin, <eremenok.k.by@...> wrote: AFAIK, there was no war declared, not at least that I was aware of when I started using Yocto Project and `meta-freescale` layer. ;-) NXP is lacking
|
By
Andrey Zhizhikin
· #24849
·
|
|
How to add my own patches to linux-fslc-imx
Hello Jan, On Thu, Jan 20, 2022 at 9:44 AM Jan Claussen via lists.yoctoproject.org <claussen.j=eppendorf.de@...> wrote: There are 3 points to be considered here, namely: 1) If those
Hello Jan, On Thu, Jan 20, 2022 at 9:44 AM Jan Claussen via lists.yoctoproject.org <claussen.j=eppendorf.de@...> wrote: There are 3 points to be considered here, namely: 1) If those
|
By
Andrey Zhizhikin
· #24810
·
|
|
How to configure eth0 on fslc-image-network-full-cmdline
Hello Leo and Fabio, There is a PR in meta-freescale layer against [master] branch, which upgrades the Kernel to 5.15.13: https://github.com/Freescale/meta-freescale/pull/936 Once merged, you can buil
Hello Leo and Fabio, There is a PR in meta-freescale layer against [master] branch, which upgrades the Kernel to 5.15.13: https://github.com/Freescale/meta-freescale/pull/936 Once merged, you can buil
|
By
Andrey Zhizhikin
· #24802
·
|
|
#meta-freescale #hardknott Can't remove use-mainline-bsp from MACHINEOVERRIDES
#meta-freescale
#hardknott
Hello Marek, This machine override is added based on the BSP flavor that the distro layer sets. BSP flavor is defined as either "mainline" which consumes only OSS components, or "nxp" which adds NXP p
Hello Marek, This machine override is added based on the BSP flavor that the distro layer sets. BSP flavor is defined as either "mainline" which consumes only OSS components, or "nxp" which adds NXP p
|
By
Andrey Zhizhikin
· #24777
·
|
|
linux-fsl 5.10 kernels don't appear to have multi-lane in sound/soc/fsl/fsl_sai.c
Hello Brian, There are 2 kernel repositories here at play, namely: - linux-fslc from Freescale GitHub - linux-imx from CodeAurora They both stem from stable korg, but using different strategy to evolv
Hello Brian, There are 2 kernel repositories here at play, namely: - linux-fslc from Freescale GitHub - linux-imx from CodeAurora They both stem from stable korg, but using different strategy to evolv
|
By
Andrey Zhizhikin
· #24772
·
|
|
linux-fsl 5.10 kernels don't appear to have multi-lane in sound/soc/fsl/fsl_sai.c
Hello Brian, linux-fslc-imx kernel recipe on the [master] branch on meta-freescale provides a kernel, which has linux-imx as a base and latest LTS applied on top. Assuming you're building now off the
Hello Brian, linux-fslc-imx kernel recipe on the [master] branch on meta-freescale provides a kernel, which has linux-imx as a base and latest LTS applied on top. Assuming you're building now off the
|
By
Andrey Zhizhikin
· #24769
·
|
|
Linux v5.10 for i.MX8 development
Hello Ankur, If you're still interested in migrating to the new linux-fslc-imx kernel, it has been integrated into meta-freescale with this PR: https://github.com/Freescale/meta-freescale/pull/876 Cur
Hello Ankur, If you're still interested in migrating to the new linux-fslc-imx kernel, it has been integrated into meta-freescale with this PR: https://github.com/Freescale/meta-freescale/pull/876 Cur
|
By
Andrey Zhizhikin
· #24761
·
|
|
Linux v5.10 for i.MX8 development
Hello Tim, It depends on the definition of "decency". :) Actually, I was referring to 5.14.y kernel, and at least from what I know USB support is present, although I did not test the performance of it
Hello Tim, It depends on the definition of "decency". :) Actually, I was referring to 5.14.y kernel, and at least from what I know USB support is present, although I did not test the performance of it
|
By
Andrey Zhizhikin
· #24757
·
|
|
Linux v5.10 for i.MX8 development
Hello Ankur, When you say that i.MX8 is not supported - to which SoC you're referring to? Mainline kernel on the [master] branch of this layer does provide a descent support for all i.MX8M derivatives
Hello Ankur, When you say that i.MX8 is not supported - to which SoC you're referring to? Mainline kernel on the [master] branch of this layer does provide a descent support for all i.MX8M derivatives
|
By
Andrey Zhizhikin
· #24753
·
|
|
#meta-freescale Broken linux-fslc/5.4-2.3.x-imx repo on hardknott branch
#meta-freescale
Hello Piotr, That is the trick: [dunfell] uses 5.4-2.1.x-imx branch, where the proper check for the return of of_get_mac_address() is not implemented. [hardknott] uses 5.4-2.3.x-imx branch, which cont
Hello Piotr, That is the trick: [dunfell] uses 5.4-2.1.x-imx branch, where the proper check for the return of of_get_mac_address() is not implemented. [hardknott] uses 5.4-2.3.x-imx branch, which cont
|
By
Andrey Zhizhikin
· #24741
·
|
|
#meta-freescale Broken linux-fslc/5.4-2.3.x-imx repo on hardknott branch
#meta-freescale
Hello Piotr, From what I see, the d01f449c008a ("of_net: add NVMEM support to of_get_mac_address") is indeed present on all NXP branches in the repository: $ git branch -r --contains d01f449c008a upst
Hello Piotr, From what I see, the d01f449c008a ("of_net: add NVMEM support to of_get_mac_address") is indeed present on all NXP branches in the repository: $ git branch -r --contains d01f449c008a upst
|
By
Andrey Zhizhikin
· #24738
·
|
|
Update linux-fslc on hardknott branch
Hello Sam, On Thu, Jul 8, 2021 at 9:49 PM Andrey Zhizhikin via lists.yoctoproject.org <andrey.z=gmail.com@...> wrote: It took me quite a while, but I've submitted the PR against [ha
Hello Sam, On Thu, Jul 8, 2021 at 9:49 PM Andrey Zhizhikin via lists.yoctoproject.org <andrey.z=gmail.com@...> wrote: It took me quite a while, but I've submitted the PR against [ha
|
By
Andrey Zhizhikin
· #24717
·
|
|
Update linux-fslc on hardknott branch
Hello Sam, This is on my TODO list, see https://github.com/Freescale/meta-freescale/pull/814 I'm pretty loaded now, but I'll see if I can bump up the version in recipes somewhen next week. Kernel tree
Hello Sam, This is on my TODO list, see https://github.com/Freescale/meta-freescale/pull/814 I'm pretty loaded now, but I'll see if I can bump up the version in recipes somewhen next week. Kernel tree
|
By
Andrey Zhizhikin
· #24712
·
|
|
Hardknott build for imx8mm-evk failed
Hello Brian, Correct, the mainline U-Boot does not have a support for i.MX8M DDR4 EVK, the commit https://source.codeaurora.org/external/imx/uboot-imx/commit/?id=07c35f48b5e9e41f7e8c1dfe81e9e50c65d4e8
Hello Brian, Correct, the mainline U-Boot does not have a support for i.MX8M DDR4 EVK, the commit https://source.codeaurora.org/external/imx/uboot-imx/commit/?id=07c35f48b5e9e41f7e8c1dfe81e9e50c65d4e8
|
By
Andrey Zhizhikin
· #24682
·
|
|
Need support for Playing video with QT Application with X11 Support on Rootfs created with Yocto Rocko version.
Hello Rohit, Have a look at this repo: https://github.com/Freescale/fsl-community-bsp-platform You can use it as a platform development base, adding layers you need into the BSP as you go. Default bra
Hello Rohit, Have a look at this repo: https://github.com/Freescale/fsl-community-bsp-platform You can use it as a platform development base, adding layers you need into the BSP as you go. Default bra
|
By
Andrey Zhizhikin
· #24670
·
|
|
Need support for Playing video with QT Application with X11 Support on Rootfs created with Yocto Rocko version.
Hello Rohit, Rocko branch is EOL since already 2,5 years, see https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/Releases Not sure if there would be any advise or support provided here for versions that are already p
Hello Rohit, Rocko branch is EOL since already 2,5 years, see https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/Releases Not sure if there would be any advise or support provided here for versions that are already p
|
By
Andrey Zhizhikin
· #24668
·
|