|
Re: [meta-xilinx] addressing security in Yocto
Security requires a holistic approach. This can be divided into design and
defect response.
The design aspect of this is left to the implementer of the device. However, as
a project we need to do a
Security requires a holistic approach. This can be divided into design and
defect response.
The design aspect of this is left to the implementer of the device. However, as
a project we need to do a
|
By
Mark Hatle <mark.hatle@...>
·
#24235
·
|
|
Re: imx8mn evk
Hello Richard,
<richard.rojfors@...> wrote:
What is the particular problem of switching to [master] branch do you have?
I hear this from a lot of people, but never had it myself... I
actually
Hello Richard,
<richard.rojfors@...> wrote:
What is the particular problem of switching to [master] branch do you have?
I hear this from a lot of people, but never had it myself... I
actually
|
By
Andrey Zhizhikin
·
#24234
·
|
|
Re: imx8mn evk
Hi,
Thanks,!
Right now its a bit of head ache to switch to master, but I reviewed the files;
It basically looks like my private patches, except I'm using a slightly older older firmware-imx,
so it
Hi,
Thanks,!
Right now its a bit of head ache to switch to master, but I reviewed the files;
It basically looks like my private patches, except I'm using a slightly older older firmware-imx,
so it
|
By
Richard Röjfors <richard.rojfors@...>
·
#24233
·
|
|
Cannot bind OpenGlES 3.2 on IMX6D
Hello,
I'm running an IMX6D board with yocto-zeus and linux-imx 4.14 but I'm unable to bind the opengl api at version 3.2.
driver is vivante V6.2.4.p4.190076 Vivante GC2000 and the changelog
Hello,
I'm running an IMX6D board with yocto-zeus and linux-imx 4.14 but I'm unable to bind the opengl api at version 3.2.
driver is vivante V6.2.4.p4.190076 Vivante GC2000 and the changelog
|
By
Federico Giovanardi
·
#24232
·
|
|
Re: Ramdisk booting: EXT4-fs (ram0): bad geometry error.
Increasing BLK_DEV_RAM_SIZE to 435752 and higher number in kernel config has solved the problem. Thanks.
Increasing BLK_DEV_RAM_SIZE to 435752 and higher number in kernel config has solved the problem. Thanks.
|
By
Yusuf <yusufalti1997@...>
·
#24231
·
|
|
Re: Ramdisk booting: EXT4-fs (ram0): bad geometry error.
By
Mike Donahoe
·
#24230
·
|
|
(PowerPC) PCI driver writeb() and readb() failures with 'machine check error'.
Hello freescale,
I am having an important trouble while communicating with my PCI Endpoint devices MMIO. I am using T1042D4RDB-64B. PowerPC e5500 processor.
I have a FPGA memory controller card which
Hello freescale,
I am having an important trouble while communicating with my PCI Endpoint devices MMIO. I am using T1042D4RDB-64B. PowerPC e5500 processor.
I have a FPGA memory controller card which
|
By
Yusuf <yusufalti1997@...>
·
#24229
·
|
|
Re: Ramdisk booting: EXT4-fs (ram0): bad geometry error.
Hello,
It's set to;
CONFIG_BLK_DEV_RAM_SIZE=131072
Hello,
It's set to;
CONFIG_BLK_DEV_RAM_SIZE=131072
|
By
Yusuf <yusufalti1997@...>
·
#24228
·
|
|
Re: Ramdisk booting: EXT4-fs (ram0): bad geometry error.
What is BLK_DEV_RAM_SIZE set to in the kernel?
Michael DonahoeSenior DeveloperSystematic Consulting Groupp:314-558-6271 ext. 106 m: 815-904-4337a:345 Marshall Avenue, Suite 103 St louis, MO
What is BLK_DEV_RAM_SIZE set to in the kernel?
Michael DonahoeSenior DeveloperSystematic Consulting Groupp:314-558-6271 ext. 106 m: 815-904-4337a:345 Marshall Avenue, Suite 103 St louis, MO
|
By
Mike Donahoe
·
#24227
·
|
|
Ramdisk booting: EXT4-fs (ram0): bad geometry error.
Hello
With t1042d4rdb-64b and yocto 2.7 ( https://source.codeaurora.org/external/qoriq/qoriq-components/yocto-sdk/tree/readme?h=warrior ) I am having bad geometry error while booting and U-boot is
Hello
With t1042d4rdb-64b and yocto 2.7 ( https://source.codeaurora.org/external/qoriq/qoriq-components/yocto-sdk/tree/readme?h=warrior ) I am having bad geometry error while booting and U-boot is
|
By
Yusuf <yusufalti1997@...>
·
#24226
·
|
|
Location of aplay.c in Yocto
Hi,
Im working on the IMX6UL14x14 evk with Yocto tool chain using BSP of 4.9.x .
At present working on the codec section, so i added the alsa package in local.conf file.
so can I know in which
Hi,
Im working on the IMX6UL14x14 evk with Yocto tool chain using BSP of 4.9.x .
At present working on the codec section, so i added the alsa package in local.conf file.
so can I know in which
|
By
Dhanush Venugopal
·
#24225
·
|
|
Re: Kernel support for i.MX6UL and 4.9 LTS updates
We've never tried 4.14. The last "LTS" version I used was 4.9.
Since then our strategy is to always use the latest stable version. Therefore
we are currently on 5.4 and will move to 5.5 in a few
We've never tried 4.14. The last "LTS" version I used was 4.9.
Since then our strategy is to always use the latest stable version. Therefore
we are currently on 5.4 and will move to 5.5 in a few
|
By
Richard Leitner
·
#24224
·
|
|
Re: Kernel support for i.MX6UL and 4.9 LTS updates
It depends in your target application/market. If anyone can connect to your device with Wi-Fi or Bluetooth, then obviously security is a lot more important.
But, consider the digital
It depends in your target application/market. If anyone can connect to your device with Wi-Fi or Bluetooth, then obviously security is a lot more important.
But, consider the digital
|
By
Clay Montgomery
·
#24223
·
|
|
Re: Kernel support for i.MX6UL and 4.9 LTS updates
Thanks for the info. Do you know if mainline 4.14.x contains adequate support for the i.MX6UL? 4.14 appears to have the longest planned support according to
Thanks for the info. Do you know if mainline 4.14.x contains adequate support for the i.MX6UL? 4.14 appears to have the longest planned support according to
|
By
Jesse Gilles
·
#24222
·
|
|
Re: Kernel support for i.MX6UL and 4.9 LTS updates
I agree with you Jesse and that's why we've been moving most of our
customers to Linux mainline. Most vendor BSP does not have stable
updates.
--
Otavio Salvador O.S.
I agree with you Jesse and that's why we've been moving most of our
customers to Linux mainline. Most vendor BSP does not have stable
updates.
--
Otavio Salvador O.S.
|
By
Otavio Salvador
·
#24221
·
|
|
Re: Kernel support for i.MX6UL and 4.9 LTS updates
Thank you for the helpful detail.
Hm, I don't agree. If an embedded Linux device uses Wi-Fi and Bluetooth communications, won't vulnerabilities affecting those parts of the kernel need to be
Thank you for the helpful detail.
Hm, I don't agree. If an embedded Linux device uses Wi-Fi and Bluetooth communications, won't vulnerabilities affecting those parts of the kernel need to be
|
By
Jesse Gilles
·
#24220
·
|
|
Re: Kernel support for i.MX6UL and 4.9 LTS updates
Jesse,
I have inserted replies below...
I mean ALL kernels from 4.9.x onward.
Many developers are using newer kernels on the i.MX6, but they got there by going to mainline and
Jesse,
I have inserted replies below...
I mean ALL kernels from 4.9.x onward.
Many developers are using newer kernels on the i.MX6, but they got there by going to mainline and
|
By
Clay Montgomery
·
#24219
·
|
|
Re: Linux Kernel Choices for i.MX8mq
Hi All,
Bump on this. I tried to build an image for the imx8mqevk using the linux-yocto 5.2 and was not able to get it to boot. Has anyone had success with the mainline kernel on the imx8m
Hi All,
Bump on this. I tried to build an image for the imx8mqevk using the linux-yocto 5.2 and was not able to get it to boot. Has anyone had success with the mainline kernel on the imx8m
|
By
Kevin Lannen
·
#24218
·
|
|
Re: Kernel support for i.MX6UL and 4.9 LTS updates
Hi,
...
We're using the latest stable mainline kernel for different i.MX6 derivates.
For us everything (USB, ETH, SATA, MMC, I2C, CODA, HDMI, etc...) works with the mainline kernel.
Except the JPEG
Hi,
...
We're using the latest stable mainline kernel for different i.MX6 derivates.
For us everything (USB, ETH, SATA, MMC, I2C, CODA, HDMI, etc...) works with the mainline kernel.
Except the JPEG
|
By
Richard Leitner
·
#24217
·
|
|
Re: Kernel support for i.MX6UL and 4.9 LTS updates
Hi Clay, thanks very much for your answers.
When you say that NXP is unlikely to fix IPU/video related driver support in newer kernels, which kernel versions are you referring to? Later NXP-released
Hi Clay, thanks very much for your answers.
When you say that NXP is unlikely to fix IPU/video related driver support in newer kernels, which kernel versions are you referring to? Later NXP-released
|
By
Jesse Gilles
·
#24216
·
|