|
Re: MTD UBI undefined reference failed to build OE gatesgarth branch
[Dropped u-boot and linux-mtd mailing lists]
Hi Jupiter,
Sorry, I finally got to look at your issue. We are in fact still working on the gatesgarth branch. I'm sorry you are running into
[Dropped u-boot and linux-mtd mailing lists]
Hi Jupiter,
Sorry, I finally got to look at your issue. We are in fact still working on the gatesgarth branch. I'm sorry you are running into
|
By
Tom Hochstein
·
#24493
·
|
|
MTD UBI undefined reference failed to build OE gatesgarth branch
Hi Tom and Lauren,
I failed to build mx6ull with MTD and UBI in OE and meta-freescahe
gatesgarth branch, please be aware that I was able to build it in zeus
branch, it seems something broken in
Hi Tom and Lauren,
I failed to build mx6ull with MTD and UBI in OE and meta-freescahe
gatesgarth branch, please be aware that I was able to build it in zeus
branch, it seems something broken in
|
By
JH
·
#24492
·
|
|
Re: MTD UBI undefined reference failed to build OE gatesgarth branch
Thanks for your response.
I am sorry, I thought that is what meta-freescale for, right? NXP
might involve the coding, but is it integrated and released by Yocto /
OE
Thanks for your response.
I am sorry, I thought that is what meta-freescale for, right? NXP
might involve the coding, but is it integrated and released by Yocto /
OE
|
By
JH
·
#24491
·
|
|
Re: MTD UBI undefined reference failed to build OE gatesgarth branch
Hello Jupiter,
From all the build logs you have, it look to me that you're trying to
build the U-Boot delivered by NXP as a part of their BSP release.
In this case, I suggest you'd rather contact
Hello Jupiter,
From all the build logs you have, it look to me that you're trying to
build the U-Boot delivered by NXP as a part of their BSP release.
In this case, I suggest you'd rather contact
|
By
Andrey Zhizhikin
·
#24490
·
|
|
Re: MTD UBI undefined reference failed to build OE gatesgarth branch
Hello,
The mtd build was fine, what could be missing not to link mtd?
$ ls 2020.04-r0/build/mx6ull_14x14_evk_nand_config/drivers/mtd
built-in.o mtdcore.su mtdpart.o mtd_uboot.o mtd-uclass.o
Hello,
The mtd build was fine, what could be missing not to link mtd?
$ ls 2020.04-r0/build/mx6ull_14x14_evk_nand_config/drivers/mtd
built-in.o mtdcore.su mtdpart.o mtd_uboot.o mtd-uclass.o
|
By
JH
·
#24489
·
|
|
MTD UBI undefined reference failed to build OE gatesgarth branch
Hello,
I was able to build MTD, UBI and u-boot on OE version Zeus branch, but
failed in gatesgarth branch. Here are errors, what could I be missing?
u-boot-imx/2020.04-r0/git/cmd/ubi.c:478:
Hello,
I was able to build MTD, UBI and u-boot on OE version Zeus branch, but
failed in gatesgarth branch. Here are errors, what could I be missing?
u-boot-imx/2020.04-r0/git/cmd/ubi.c:478:
|
By
JH
·
#24488
·
|
|
Enable Etnaviv driver for IMX8MQ
Hello,
I would like to know if it is possible to use Etnaviv driver instead of IMX-GPU-VIV on the IMX8MQEVK for hardware acceleration ? Did someone already manage to setup such
Hello,
I would like to know if it is possible to use Etnaviv driver instead of IMX-GPU-VIV on the IMX8MQEVK for hardware acceleration ? Did someone already manage to setup such
|
By
Dylan Laduranty
·
#24487
·
|
|
Re: i.mx8mm desktop environment
Hello,
Em qua., 9 de dez. de 2020 às 12:21, Erhan via lists.yoctoproject.org <erhan14=yahoo.com@...> escreveu:
Yes, this is technically viable but I strongly advise you use at least dunfell for this.
Hello,
Em qua., 9 de dez. de 2020 às 12:21, Erhan via lists.yoctoproject.org <erhan14=yahoo.com@...> escreveu:
Yes, this is technically viable but I strongly advise you use at least dunfell for this.
|
By
Otavio Salvador
·
#24486
·
|
|
i.mx8mm desktop environment
Sorry if this is the wrong mailing list.
We want to build a desktop environment for i.mx8m mini EVK.
As only wayland is supported with GPU acceleration which desktop environments we can build out of
Sorry if this is the wrong mailing list.
We want to build a desktop environment for i.mx8m mini EVK.
As only wayland is supported with GPU acceleration which desktop environments we can build out of
|
By
Erhan
·
#24485
·
|
|
Re: Using a .dtb built with kernel from Yocto 3.1.1 with u-boot from Yocto 3.1.2 results in "base fdt does did not have a /__symbols__ node ..."
I made an error in my original post. It was when I moved from Yocto 3.1.2 to 3.1.3 that I noticed this whole:
"failed on fdt_overlay_apply(): FDT_ERR_NOTFOUND
base fdt does did not have a
I made an error in my original post. It was when I moved from Yocto 3.1.2 to 3.1.3 that I noticed this whole:
"failed on fdt_overlay_apply(): FDT_ERR_NOTFOUND
base fdt does did not have a
|
By
Brian Hutchinson
·
#24484
·
|
|
Using a .dtb built with kernel from Yocto 3.1.1 with u-boot from Yocto 3.1.2 results in "base fdt does did not have a /__symbols__ node ..."
I have no clue what my problem is here.
I built imx8mm-evk.dtb (kernel version 5.4.51) in Yocto meta-freescale environment from Dunfell/Yocto 3.1.1, and then moved on to Dunfell/Yocto 3.1.2. Looks
I have no clue what my problem is here.
I built imx8mm-evk.dtb (kernel version 5.4.51) in Yocto meta-freescale environment from Dunfell/Yocto 3.1.1, and then moved on to Dunfell/Yocto 3.1.2. Looks
|
By
Brian Hutchinson
·
#24483
·
|
|
Re: #yocto #meta-java
#yocto
#meta-java
<richard.leitner@...> wrote:
I believe the reason is NXP provides their vendor BSP based on zeus,
hence the author opted to checkout corresponding branch in meta-java.
This is a good
<richard.leitner@...> wrote:
I believe the reason is NXP provides their vendor BSP based on zeus,
hence the author opted to checkout corresponding branch in meta-java.
This is a good
|
By
Andrey Zhizhikin
·
#24482
·
|
|
Re: #yocto #meta-java
#yocto
#meta-java
Hi,
I guess that should read "origin/zeus"? 😉
Is there a specific reason why you're using zeus? I'm asking because I'm
currently not maintaining the zeus branch of meta-java (as it's
Hi,
I guess that should read "origin/zeus"? 😉
Is there a specific reason why you're using zeus? I'm asking because I'm
currently not maintaining the zeus branch of meta-java (as it's
|
By
Richard Leitner
·
#24481
·
|
|
#yocto #meta-java
#yocto
#meta-java
Hello;
I'm working on a Ubuntu 18.04 machine. and NXP release L5.4.24 for IMX8M Mini.
I did successfully "bitbake" my custom image.
Then I am trying to add support for openjdk-8.
Referred "How to add
Hello;
I'm working on a Ubuntu 18.04 machine. and NXP release L5.4.24 for IMX8M Mini.
I did successfully "bitbake" my custom image.
Then I am trying to add support for openjdk-8.
Referred "How to add
|
By
feki.ayman94@...
·
#24480
·
Edited
|
|
Re: Cannot run "devtool mofidy linux-fslc" in Dunfell branch
Hi, I'm facing the exact same issue. This is the ("same") message after updating to 5.4.72 on poky 3.2 to see if that would resolve the issue.
ERROR: Execution of
Hi, I'm facing the exact same issue. This is the ("same") message after updating to 5.4.72 on poky 3.2 to see if that would resolve the issue.
ERROR: Execution of
|
By
bartvanderlaan
·
#24479
·
|
|
Re: Cannot run "devtool mofidy linux-fslc" in Dunfell branch
I'm still having the same issue. I cannot run devtool modify linux-fslc. I'm using dunfell with imx6ullevk.
I'm still having the same issue. I cannot run devtool modify linux-fslc. I'm using dunfell with imx6ullevk.
|
By
Ks89 <stefano.cappa.ks89@...>
·
#24478
·
|
|
Re: [IMX6Q][Dunfell] Problem using imxeglvivsink on top of X11
https://github.com/Freescale/meta-freescale
Em ter., 20 de out. de 2020 às 14:28, Wouter Vanhauwaert
<w.vanhauwaert@...> escreveu:
--
Otavio Salvador O.S.
https://github.com/Freescale/meta-freescale
Em ter., 20 de out. de 2020 às 14:28, Wouter Vanhauwaert
<w.vanhauwaert@...> escreveu:
--
Otavio Salvador O.S.
|
By
Otavio Salvador
·
#24477
·
|
|
Re: [IMX6Q][Dunfell] Problem using imxeglvivsink on top of X11
Ehm, which github?
And would anyone be able to reproduce it at his side? (so I know it's not just me ;-))
Ehm, which github?
And would anyone be able to reproduce it at his side? (so I know it's not just me ;-))
|
By
Wouter Vanhauwaert
·
#24476
·
|
|
Re: Enabling ION with CMA heap on imx6
Yes, this happened in the past. However, the benefits of DMA-BUF outweigh this IMO. I also have the libimxdmabuffer library to encapsulate such details.
The alternative is to rely on IPU/VPU/etc.
Yes, this happened in the past. However, the benefits of DMA-BUF outweigh this IMO. I also have the libimxdmabuffer library to encapsulate such details.
The alternative is to rely on IPU/VPU/etc.
|
By
Carlos Rafael Giani
·
#24475
·
|
|
Re: Enabling ION with CMA heap on imx6
For i.MX8 it is enabled already.
On 20.10.20 13:31, Otavio Salvador wrote:
For i.MX8 it is enabled already.
On 20.10.20 13:31, Otavio Salvador wrote:
|
By
Carlos Rafael Giani
·
#24474
·
|