|
Re: Latest build of fsl-community-bsp kernel hangs booting imx8mmevk
Hello Fabio,
Em qui., 10 de set. de 2020 às 09:03, Fabio Estevam
<festevam@...> escreveu:
Could U-Boot load the correct dtb for the board revision?
--
Otavio Salvador
Hello Fabio,
Em qui., 10 de set. de 2020 às 09:03, Fabio Estevam
<festevam@...> escreveu:
Could U-Boot load the correct dtb for the board revision?
--
Otavio Salvador
|
By
Otavio Salvador
·
#24401
·
|
|
Re: Latest build of fsl-community-bsp kernel hangs booting imx8mmevk
Hi Carlos,
<otavio.salvador@...> wrote:
Do you have a revB board?
If so, please use imx8mm-evk-revb.dtb instead as there is a difference
between revB versus revC that is related to the
Hi Carlos,
<otavio.salvador@...> wrote:
Do you have a revB board?
If so, please use imx8mm-evk-revb.dtb instead as there is a difference
between revB versus revC that is related to the
|
By
Fabio Estevam
·
#24400
·
|
|
Re: Latest build of fsl-community-bsp kernel hangs booting imx8mmevk
Hello all,
Em qui., 10 de set. de 2020 às 05:12, Carlos Rafael Giani
<crg7475@...> escreveu:
...
Could you guys open an issue on github about this?
--
Otavio Salvador
Hello all,
Em qui., 10 de set. de 2020 às 05:12, Carlos Rafael Giani
<crg7475@...> escreveu:
...
Could you guys open an issue on github about this?
--
Otavio Salvador
|
By
Otavio Salvador
·
#24399
·
|
|
Re: Latest build of fsl-community-bsp kernel hangs booting imx8mmevk
I have the same problem. imx8mmevk does not boot with Yocto Dunfell. Booting stops at "PCIe PLL lock timeout" or "Initialized imx-drm 1.0.0 20120507 for soc@0:bus@32c00000:display-subsystem
I have the same problem. imx8mmevk does not boot with Yocto Dunfell. Booting stops at "PCIe PLL lock timeout" or "Initialized imx-drm 1.0.0 20120507 for soc@0:bus@32c00000:display-subsystem
|
By
Carlos Rafael Giani
·
#24398
·
|
|
Re: Build error of perf
Hi, Yang
The following is the status of linux-qoriq that I'm using:
-------------------------------------
tmp/work-shared/ubinux-armv8/kernel-source$ git branch
* (HEAD detached at 134788b16485)
Hi, Yang
The following is the status of linux-qoriq that I'm using:
-------------------------------------
tmp/work-shared/ubinux-armv8/kernel-source$ git branch
* (HEAD detached at 134788b16485)
|
By
leimaohui
·
#24397
·
|
|
Re: Build error of perf
Hi Lei,
May I know which branch you are using?
Best Regards,
Zhenhua
Hi Lei,
May I know which branch you are using?
Best Regards,
Zhenhua
|
By
Zhenhua Luo
·
#24396
·
|
|
Re: Build error of perf
Hi, Andrey
I'm using linux-qoriq and I have updated to the newest commit of meta-freescale.
Best regards
Lei
Hi, Andrey
I'm using linux-qoriq and I have updated to the newest commit of meta-freescale.
Best regards
Lei
|
By
leimaohui
·
#24395
·
|
|
Re: Build error of perf
Hello Lei,
This is covered by [df35e878d0a51755fb500e2e8e29c7ebb0239756] which is
present in the kernel tree and came in with v5.4.56.
I guess you're not building the latest meta-freescale, since
Hello Lei,
This is covered by [df35e878d0a51755fb500e2e8e29c7ebb0239756] which is
present in the kernel tree and came in with v5.4.56.
I guess you're not building the latest meta-freescale, since
|
By
Andrey Zhizhikin
·
#24394
·
|
|
Build error of perf
Hi,
By latest meta-freescale, perf build failed, the error is as following:
---------------------------------------------
aarch64-ubinux-linux-ld:
Hi,
By latest meta-freescale, perf build failed, the error is as following:
---------------------------------------------
aarch64-ubinux-linux-ld:
|
By
leimaohui
·
#24393
·
|
|
Re: imx51evk and Zeus
Em ter., 25 de ago. de 2020 às 11:13, Mauro Ziliani
<mauro@...> escreveu:
u-boot-imx does not officially support it, so u-boot-fslc is the best call here.
--
Otavio Salvador
Em ter., 25 de ago. de 2020 às 11:13, Mauro Ziliani
<mauro@...> escreveu:
u-boot-imx does not officially support it, so u-boot-fslc is the best call here.
--
Otavio Salvador
|
By
Otavio Salvador
·
#24392
·
|
|
Re: imx51evk and Zeus
Thank you for the answer.
For imx51evk which u-boot is better? u-boot-fslc or u-boot-imx?
Thank you for the answer.
For imx51evk which u-boot is better? u-boot-fslc or u-boot-imx?
|
By
Mauro Ziliani
·
#24391
·
|
|
Re: imx51evk and Zeus
I'd go with dunfell as you need Linux mainline for it.
Em ter., 25 de ago. de 2020 às 06:08, Mauro Ziliani
<mauro@...> escreveu:
--
Otavio Salvador O.S.
I'd go with dunfell as you need Linux mainline for it.
Em ter., 25 de ago. de 2020 às 06:08, Mauro Ziliani
<mauro@...> escreveu:
--
Otavio Salvador O.S.
|
By
Otavio Salvador
·
#24390
·
|
|
imx51evk and Zeus
Hi all.
I'm working on a imx51evk clone board and Zeus.
U-boot-fslc restart with POR cause.
Where i can find good docs for Zeus and imx51evk?
Best regards,
MZ
Hi all.
I'm working on a imx51evk clone board and Zeus.
U-boot-fslc restart with POR cause.
Where i can find good docs for Zeus and imx51evk?
Best regards,
MZ
|
By
Mauro Ziliani
·
#24389
·
|
|
Imx6q: Mirror lvds and lcd on linux-fslc-imx
Hello,
I want to connect 2 identical FHD screens (timing-wise) to my imx6q board. One is LCD and the other one (dualchannel) LVDS. I only want to render content once (for perfomance) and output it on
Hello,
I want to connect 2 identical FHD screens (timing-wise) to my imx6q board. One is LCD and the other one (dualchannel) LVDS. I only want to render content once (for perfomance) and output it on
|
By
Wouter Vanhauwaert
·
#24388
·
|
|
Re: Adding LCD display (none lvds) in Linux 5.4 fslc?
Hi Wouter,
<w.vanhauwaert@...> wrote:
Yes, when I looked at the commit you referred to I thought initially
that it only added drivers/video/fbdev/mxsfb.c, which is the eLCDIF
controller. In
Hi Wouter,
<w.vanhauwaert@...> wrote:
Yes, when I looked at the commit you referred to I thought initially
that it only added drivers/video/fbdev/mxsfb.c, which is the eLCDIF
controller. In
|
By
Fabio Estevam
·
#24387
·
|
|
Re: Adding LCD display (none lvds) in Linux 5.4 fslc?
Sorry, but I think that's not correct...
Indeed, you can use fsl,imx-parallel-display, but then you're using the opensource/drm mainline way of addressing the ipu, and not the freescale proprietary
Sorry, but I think that's not correct...
Indeed, you can use fsl,imx-parallel-display, but then you're using the opensource/drm mainline way of addressing the ipu, and not the freescale proprietary
|
By
Wouter Vanhauwaert
·
#24386
·
|
|
Re: Adding LCD display (none lvds) in Linux 5.4 fslc?
Hi Wouter,
<w.vanhauwaert@...> wrote:
eLCDIF is a different display controller that is found on other i.MX
SoCs like imx23/imx28/imx6sl/imx6sx.
On imx6q/dl the display controller is the
Hi Wouter,
<w.vanhauwaert@...> wrote:
eLCDIF is a different display controller that is found on other i.MX
SoCs like imx23/imx28/imx6sl/imx6sx.
On imx6q/dl the display controller is the
|
By
Fabio Estevam
·
#24385
·
|
|
Re: fec driver works on linux-imx, not linux-fslc+use-mainline-bsp (imx6dl)
Hello Christian,
Do you see the same behavior with linux-fslc-imx kernel tree? It is
basically NXP kernel + latest patch level from upstream.
Can you test that one and let here know if you have the
Hello Christian,
Do you see the same behavior with linux-fslc-imx kernel tree? It is
basically NXP kernel + latest patch level from upstream.
Can you test that one and let here know if you have the
|
By
Andrey Zhizhikin
·
#24384
·
|
|
Re: fec driver works on linux-imx, not linux-fslc+use-mainline-bsp (imx6dl)
Hi Christian,
What is the Ethernet PHY on your board? Is it getting detected by
looking at the dmesg log?
Could you share the schematics and device tree?
Hi Christian,
What is the Ethernet PHY on your board? Is it getting detected by
looking at the dmesg log?
Could you share the schematics and device tree?
|
By
Fabio Estevam
·
#24383
·
|
|
fec driver works on linux-imx, not linux-fslc+use-mainline-bsp (imx6dl)
Hi,
I'm porting a custom MX6DL board from linux-imx to linux-fslc (along with use-mainline-bsp in FEATURES). The primary reason for this choice was for etnaviv support and a general preference for a
Hi,
I'm porting a custom MX6DL board from linux-imx to linux-fslc (along with use-mainline-bsp in FEATURES). The primary reason for this choice was for etnaviv support and a general preference for a
|
By
Christian Betz
·
#24382
·
|