|
Re: Build error of perf
Hi Lei,
May I know which branch you are using?
Best Regards,
Zhenhua
Hi Lei,
May I know which branch you are using?
Best Regards,
Zhenhua
|
By
Zhenhua Luo
·
#24396
·
|
|
Re: Build error of perf
Hi, Andrey
I'm using linux-qoriq and I have updated to the newest commit of meta-freescale.
Best regards
Lei
Hi, Andrey
I'm using linux-qoriq and I have updated to the newest commit of meta-freescale.
Best regards
Lei
|
By
leimaohui
·
#24395
·
|
|
Re: Build error of perf
Hello Lei,
This is covered by [df35e878d0a51755fb500e2e8e29c7ebb0239756] which is
present in the kernel tree and came in with v5.4.56.
I guess you're not building the latest meta-freescale, since
Hello Lei,
This is covered by [df35e878d0a51755fb500e2e8e29c7ebb0239756] which is
present in the kernel tree and came in with v5.4.56.
I guess you're not building the latest meta-freescale, since
|
By
Andrey Zhizhikin
·
#24394
·
|
|
Build error of perf
Hi,
By latest meta-freescale, perf build failed, the error is as following:
---------------------------------------------
aarch64-ubinux-linux-ld:
Hi,
By latest meta-freescale, perf build failed, the error is as following:
---------------------------------------------
aarch64-ubinux-linux-ld:
|
By
leimaohui
·
#24393
·
|
|
Re: imx51evk and Zeus
Em ter., 25 de ago. de 2020 às 11:13, Mauro Ziliani
<mauro@...> escreveu:
u-boot-imx does not officially support it, so u-boot-fslc is the best call here.
--
Otavio Salvador
Em ter., 25 de ago. de 2020 às 11:13, Mauro Ziliani
<mauro@...> escreveu:
u-boot-imx does not officially support it, so u-boot-fslc is the best call here.
--
Otavio Salvador
|
By
Otavio Salvador
·
#24392
·
|
|
Re: imx51evk and Zeus
Thank you for the answer.
For imx51evk which u-boot is better? u-boot-fslc or u-boot-imx?
Thank you for the answer.
For imx51evk which u-boot is better? u-boot-fslc or u-boot-imx?
|
By
Mauro Ziliani
·
#24391
·
|
|
Re: imx51evk and Zeus
I'd go with dunfell as you need Linux mainline for it.
Em ter., 25 de ago. de 2020 às 06:08, Mauro Ziliani
<mauro@...> escreveu:
--
Otavio Salvador O.S.
I'd go with dunfell as you need Linux mainline for it.
Em ter., 25 de ago. de 2020 às 06:08, Mauro Ziliani
<mauro@...> escreveu:
--
Otavio Salvador O.S.
|
By
Otavio Salvador
·
#24390
·
|
|
imx51evk and Zeus
Hi all.
I'm working on a imx51evk clone board and Zeus.
U-boot-fslc restart with POR cause.
Where i can find good docs for Zeus and imx51evk?
Best regards,
MZ
Hi all.
I'm working on a imx51evk clone board and Zeus.
U-boot-fslc restart with POR cause.
Where i can find good docs for Zeus and imx51evk?
Best regards,
MZ
|
By
Mauro Ziliani
·
#24389
·
|
|
Imx6q: Mirror lvds and lcd on linux-fslc-imx
Hello,
I want to connect 2 identical FHD screens (timing-wise) to my imx6q board. One is LCD and the other one (dualchannel) LVDS. I only want to render content once (for perfomance) and output it on
Hello,
I want to connect 2 identical FHD screens (timing-wise) to my imx6q board. One is LCD and the other one (dualchannel) LVDS. I only want to render content once (for perfomance) and output it on
|
By
Wouter Vanhauwaert
·
#24388
·
|
|
Re: Adding LCD display (none lvds) in Linux 5.4 fslc?
Hi Wouter,
<w.vanhauwaert@...> wrote:
Yes, when I looked at the commit you referred to I thought initially
that it only added drivers/video/fbdev/mxsfb.c, which is the eLCDIF
controller. In
Hi Wouter,
<w.vanhauwaert@...> wrote:
Yes, when I looked at the commit you referred to I thought initially
that it only added drivers/video/fbdev/mxsfb.c, which is the eLCDIF
controller. In
|
By
Fabio Estevam
·
#24387
·
|
|
Re: Adding LCD display (none lvds) in Linux 5.4 fslc?
Sorry, but I think that's not correct...
Indeed, you can use fsl,imx-parallel-display, but then you're using the opensource/drm mainline way of addressing the ipu, and not the freescale proprietary
Sorry, but I think that's not correct...
Indeed, you can use fsl,imx-parallel-display, but then you're using the opensource/drm mainline way of addressing the ipu, and not the freescale proprietary
|
By
Wouter Vanhauwaert
·
#24386
·
|
|
Re: Adding LCD display (none lvds) in Linux 5.4 fslc?
Hi Wouter,
<w.vanhauwaert@...> wrote:
eLCDIF is a different display controller that is found on other i.MX
SoCs like imx23/imx28/imx6sl/imx6sx.
On imx6q/dl the display controller is the
Hi Wouter,
<w.vanhauwaert@...> wrote:
eLCDIF is a different display controller that is found on other i.MX
SoCs like imx23/imx28/imx6sl/imx6sx.
On imx6q/dl the display controller is the
|
By
Fabio Estevam
·
#24385
·
|
|
Re: fec driver works on linux-imx, not linux-fslc+use-mainline-bsp (imx6dl)
Hello Christian,
Do you see the same behavior with linux-fslc-imx kernel tree? It is
basically NXP kernel + latest patch level from upstream.
Can you test that one and let here know if you have the
Hello Christian,
Do you see the same behavior with linux-fslc-imx kernel tree? It is
basically NXP kernel + latest patch level from upstream.
Can you test that one and let here know if you have the
|
By
Andrey Zhizhikin
·
#24384
·
|
|
Re: fec driver works on linux-imx, not linux-fslc+use-mainline-bsp (imx6dl)
Hi Christian,
What is the Ethernet PHY on your board? Is it getting detected by
looking at the dmesg log?
Could you share the schematics and device tree?
Hi Christian,
What is the Ethernet PHY on your board? Is it getting detected by
looking at the dmesg log?
Could you share the schematics and device tree?
|
By
Fabio Estevam
·
#24383
·
|
|
fec driver works on linux-imx, not linux-fslc+use-mainline-bsp (imx6dl)
Hi,
I'm porting a custom MX6DL board from linux-imx to linux-fslc (along with use-mainline-bsp in FEATURES). The primary reason for this choice was for etnaviv support and a general preference for a
Hi,
I'm porting a custom MX6DL board from linux-imx to linux-fslc (along with use-mainline-bsp in FEATURES). The primary reason for this choice was for etnaviv support and a general preference for a
|
By
Christian Betz
·
#24382
·
|
|
Re: Adding LCD display (none lvds) in Linux 5.4 fslc?
Hmm, it doesn't work.
But is this endpoint-setup not meant to be used together with DRM?
Whereas before it was for mxcfb? I'm stilll a bit lost...
Hmm, it doesn't work.
But is this endpoint-setup not meant to be used together with DRM?
Whereas before it was for mxcfb? I'm stilll a bit lost...
|
By
Wouter Vanhauwaert
·
#24381
·
|
|
Re: Adding LCD display (none lvds) in Linux 5.4 fslc?
Ok, I'll try it out.
Still I don't understand why they would only change half of the functionality.... (And who decides or follows up)
Ok, I'll try it out.
Still I don't understand why they would only change half of the functionality.... (And who decides or follows up)
|
By
Wouter Vanhauwaert
·
#24380
·
|
|
Re: SPI for IMX6x with cyclic DMA
Great, thanks!
By
Andrea Tessadri <tessadriandrea@...>
·
#24379
·
|
|
Re: SPI for IMX6x with cyclic DMA
<tessadriandrea@...> wrote:
This is definitely a wrong list for those changes, it should go to
LKML instead. This list is used for discussions regarding Yocto
Project distribution, and I believe
<tessadriandrea@...> wrote:
This is definitely a wrong list for those changes, it should go to
LKML instead. This list is used for discussions regarding Yocto
Project distribution, and I believe
|
By
Andrey Zhizhikin
·
#24378
·
|
|
Re: Adding LCD display (none lvds) in Linux 5.4 fslc?
On Thu, Aug 13, 2020 at 9:49 AM Christian Betz via lists.yoctoproject.org <christian.betz=gmail.com@...> wrote:
I forgot to mention: I am using "use-mainline-bsp" here and I think that matters, as
On Thu, Aug 13, 2020 at 9:49 AM Christian Betz via lists.yoctoproject.org <christian.betz=gmail.com@...> wrote:
I forgot to mention: I am using "use-mainline-bsp" here and I think that matters, as
|
By
Christian Betz
·
#24377
·
|