On 7/9/22 6:47 AM, Andrey Zhizhikin wrote:

[You don't often get email from andrey.z@.... Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ]

Hello Sean,

On Fri, Jul 8, 2022 at 10:42 PM Sean Anderson via
lists.yoctoproject.org <sean.anderson=seco.com@...>
wrote:

On 3/17/22 11:36 AM, Sean Anderson wrote:

This bbappend depends on the virtualization-layer collection. Move it
under the appropriate dynamic layer directory.

Signed-off-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@...>
---

.../virtualization-layer/recipes-containers}/lxc/lxc_%.bbappend | 0
1 file changed, 0 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
rename {recipes-containers => dynamic-layers/virtualization-layer/recipes-containers}/lxc/lxc_%.bbappend (100%)

diff --git a/recipes-containers/lxc/lxc_%.bbappend b/dynamic-layers/virtualization-layer/recipes-containers/lxc/lxc_%.bbappend
similarity index 100%
rename from recipes-containers/lxc/lxc_%.bbappend
rename to dynamic-layers/virtualization-layer/recipes-containers/lxc/lxc_%.bbappend

ping?

If this targets `meta-freescale` layer,

This targets meta-qoriq.

then perhaps best would be to
send a PR against it. I'm not sure that someone is picking up patches
from this ML...

Unfortunately, there is no dedicated mailing list for meta-qoriq. I have
CC'd as many relevant people at NXP as I can find. I have added this
mailing list to CC in hopes that if I have omitted the proper person at
NXP that they can apply it.

--Sean