Re: linux-imx-headers and ioctl mismatches
Hi Otavio,toggle quoted message Show quoted text
I would be happy to help out some with moving linux-imx to the 5.4 kernel as we are very interested in using it. Is this planned to be in for the Dunfell branch when that is released?
Embedded Systems Engineer
From: meta-freescale@... <meta-freescale@...> On Behalf Of Otavio Salvador via lists.yoctoproject.org
Sent: Friday, April 10, 2020 11:52 AM
To: Gary Bisson <gary.bisson@...>
Cc: Carlos Rafael Giani <crg7475@...>; meta-freescale <meta-freescale@...>; Chris Dimich <chris.dimich@...>
Subject: Re: [meta-freescale] linux-imx-headers and ioctl mismatches
On Fri, Apr 10, 2020 at 11:46 AM Gary Bisson <gary.bisson@...> wrote:
On Fri, Apr 10, 2020 at 11:22:45AM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:Add a patch to the layer for it.On Fri, Apr 10, 2020 at 11:20 AM Carlos Rafael GianiI understand it's a tricky topic as some packages won't build if the
Otavio, do you expect all the vendors to have their kernel matchingand it is vendors consideration for their users. If they don't care, who should care? We are starting removing broken boards and vendors should pay attention to users.
There are two routes here:
- use mainline BSP
- use NXP BSP
for NXP BSP it comes with the need to keep upgrading it.
I personnaly think that the headers should be installed from theThis does not help; those headers should not exists in first case but as we do, a common base need to be used for all distro. Their symbols goes to other libraries and apps so it cannot change between machines.
FYI, our next kernel release will be 5.4.3_1.0.0 as it is out sinceWill be going to 5.4 soon and people can help, patches welcome.
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
Mobile: +55 (53) 9 9981-7854 Mobile: +1 (347) 903-9750