On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 1:07 PM, Bas Mevissen <abuse@...> wrote:
I tried linux-fslc@c4404197b0b22f479d9548e81a8a4ed639d4dd7c with commit 3e9b36edc01ec3b896bf212a2a7cccc32ed3f047 reverted and that works fine.
I don't think that 3e9b36edc01ec3b896bf212a2a7cccc32ed3f047 should have been applied to linux-fslc to start with. This commit is in linux-next currently and it will be part of the upcoming 4.15-rc1. IMHO linux-fslc should only contain the patches from linux-stable tree with a few exceptions like: new dts files, for example.
What's the best thing to do now? Revert 3e9b36e for now and push that to linux-fslc?
I think we can do two things: - Revert 3e9b36e from linux-fslc
This is what Otavio kindly pushed in a4f7f0ac8250ff10d6111df25e7d940a2f36801a and I can confirm it works on my board (i.MX6 dual).
- If you could try linux-next on your board and see if it works well or not. This way we can antecipate any possible issues with the SPI driver for the upcoming 4.15-rc1.