On 21/11/2017 17:05, Otavio Salvador wrote:
On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 1:24 PM, Fabio Estevam <festevam@...> wrote:
On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 1:07 PM, Bas Mevissen <abuse@...> wrote:I did revert the it and pushed to linux-fslc.
I tried linux-fslc@c4404197b0b22f479d9548e81a8a4ed639d4dd7c with commitI don't think that 3e9b36edc01ec3b896bf212a2a7cccc32ed3f047 should
3e9b36edc01ec3b896bf212a2a7cccc32ed3f047 reverted and that works fine.
have been applied to linux-fslc to start with.
This commit is in linux-next currently and it will be part of the
IMHO linux-fslc should only contain the patches from linux-stable tree
with a few exceptions like: new dts files, for example.
What's the best thing to do now? Revert 3e9b36e for now and push that toI think we can do two things:
- Revert 3e9b36e from linux-fslc
Please confirm it works.
Thanks a lot! I can confirm it works like a charm.