Re: Updates to meta-fsl-arm (master) in 2016-01-11

Zhenhua Luo

Hello Otavio,

Before meta-fsl-arm and meta-fsl-ppc are formally replaced by meta-freescale in, we should ensure the QorIQ bits are available in meta-fsl-arm and meta-fsl-ppc.

The duplicated effort is done for both i.MX and QorIQ products currently, to avoid such duplicated effort, we'd better make meta-freescale replace fsl-arm and fsl-ppc ASAP. What's your thought?

Best Regards,


-----Original Message-----
From: Otavio Salvador [mailto:otavio.salvador@...]
Sent: Tuesday, January 12, 2016 2:33 AM
To: Ting Liu <ting.liu@...>
Cc: meta-freescale@...; Zhenhua Luo <zhenhua.luo@...>
Subject: Re: [meta-freescale] Updates to meta-fsl-arm (master) in 2016-01-11

On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 4:23 PM, Ting Liu <ting.liu@...> wrote:
I sent some patches to meta-fsl-arm on 2015-12-15 and noticed that they are
marked as 'rejected' just now.
No comment for 'rejected'?
I noticed they were the same sent for meta-freescale and as meta-fsl-arm is
not being use for QorIQ releases do you think it is worth keeping it receiving

If it is really desired I can go over them but as meta-freescale is in use for QorIQ
it seems like pushing them there makes more sense and avoid duplication.

I didn't yet did a major review of them, as I am on holidays, but will do as time

Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
Mobile: +55 (53) 9981-7854 Mobile: +1 (347) 903-9750

Join { to automatically receive all group messages.