Re: [meta-fsl-arm][PATCH V2 ] qe-ucode :add recipes for Layerscape1 support


Gary Thomas <samoht.yrag@...>
 

On 2014-12-22 01:43, b40290@... wrote:
From: Chunrong Guo <B40290@...>

QE microcode from Freescale is typically provided as a header file.
This header file contains macros that define the microcode binary itself as well as
some other data used in uploading that microcode

Signed-off-by: Chunrong Guo <B40290@...>
---
conf/machine/ls1021aqds.conf | 2 ++
conf/machine/ls1021atwr.conf | 1 +
recipes-bsp/qe-ucode/qe-ucode_git.bb | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
3 files changed, 31 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 recipes-bsp/qe-ucode/qe-ucode_git.bb

diff --git a/conf/machine/ls1021aqds.conf b/conf/machine/ls1021aqds.conf
index d659196..60df6c0 100644
--- a/conf/machine/ls1021aqds.conf
+++ b/conf/machine/ls1021aqds.conf
@@ -15,6 +15,8 @@ UBOOT_CONFIG[qspi] = "ls1021aqds_qspi_config"
UBOOT_CONFIG[nor-secboot] = "ls1021aqds_nor_secboot_config"
UBOOT_CONFIG[lpuart] = "ls1021aqds_lpuart_config"

+QE_UCODE="iram_Type_A_LS1021a_r1.0.bin"
+
KERNEL_DEVICETREE = "ls1021aqds.dtb"

SERIAL_CONSOLES ?= "115200;ttyS0 115200;ttyS1 115200;ttyEHV0 115200;ttyLP0"
diff --git a/conf/machine/ls1021atwr.conf b/conf/machine/ls1021atwr.conf
index e549ac3..73f222d 100644
--- a/conf/machine/ls1021atwr.conf
+++ b/conf/machine/ls1021atwr.conf
@@ -14,6 +14,7 @@ UBOOT_CONFIG[nor] = "ls1021atwr_nor_config"
UBOOT_CONFIG[sdcard] = "ls1021atwr_sdcard_config,sdcard"
UBOOT_CONFIG[lpuart] = "ls1021atwr_lpuart_config"

+QE_UCODE="iram_Type_A_LS1021a_r1.0.bin"

KERNEL_DEVICETREE ?= "ls1021atwr.dtb"

diff --git a/recipes-bsp/qe-ucode/qe-ucode_git.bb b/recipes-bsp/qe-ucode/qe-ucode_git.bb
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..1983d9a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/recipes-bsp/qe-ucode/qe-ucode_git.bb
@@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
+DESCRIPTION = "qe microcode binary"
+SECTION = "qe-ucode"
+LICENSE = "Freescale-EULA"
+LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://EULA;md5=60037ccba533a5995e8d1a838d85799c"
+
+inherit deploy
+
+SRC_URI = "git://git.freescale.com/ppc/sdk/qe-ucode.git;nobranch=1"
+SRCREV= "49efc94b553de5c2a9bd28093592eff0068e161c"
+
+S = "${WORKDIR}/git"
+
+do_install () {
+ install -d ${D}/
+ install -m 644 ${QE_UCODE} ${D}/
+}
+
+do_deploy () {
+ install -d ${DEPLOYDIR}/
+ install -m 644 ${QE_UCODE} ${DEPLOYDIR}/
+}
+addtask deploy before do_build after do_install
+
+PACKAGES += "${PN}-image"
+FILES_${PN}-image += "/*"
+ALLOW_EMPTY_${PN} = "1"
+COMPATIBLE_MACHINE = "(ls1021atwr|ls1021aqds)"
Is this recipe truly *machine* dependent, or *SOC* dependent? e.g. I have
a target which is roughly the same as the ls1021atwr which could use this
and the way this recipe is written, I'd have to write a .bbappend to
extend COMPATIBLE_MACHINE which seems a bit sad...

Join meta-freescale@lists.yoctoproject.org to automatically receive all group messages.